Integrated hazard avoidance system

• US 6,002,347 A
• Filed: 04/23/1997
• Issued: 12/14/1999
• Est. Priority Date: 04/23/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Alliedsignal Inc.
• Original Assignee: Alliedsignal Inc.
• Inventors: Kuntman, Daryal, McElroy, James J., Doerenberg, Frank, Daly, Francis W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Lee, Benjamin C.
• Application Number:
  US08/847,328
• Time in Patent Office: 965 Days
• Field of Search: 340/945, 340/961, 340/963, 340/964, 340/965, 340/967, 340/968, 340/969, 340/970, 340/984, 701/301, 701/4, 701/14, 701/120
• US Class Current: 340/963
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/91 for traffic control G01S13/93 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/933 of aircraft or spacecraft
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/935 for terrain-avoidance
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/95 for meteorological use
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/953 mounted on aircraft
• CPC Class Codes: G05D 1/0055 with safety arrangements
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0078 for monitoring traffic from the aircraft radar or analogous systems specially adapted for traffic control G01S13/91
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0086 for monitoring terrain radar or analogous systems specially adapted for terrain avoidance G01S13/935
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/0091 for monitoring atmospheric conditions radar or analogous systems specially adapted for meteorological use G01S13/95; meteorology G01W
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 5/045 Navigation or guidance aids, e.g. determination of anti-collision manoeuvers radar or analogous systems specially adapted for anti-collision between aircraft G01S13/933
• CPC Class Codes: Y02A 90/10 Information and communication technologies [ICT] supporting adaptation to climate change, e.g. for weather forecasting or climate simulation

Abstract

A hazard alert device for aircraft prioritizes various alerts according to predefined criteria. The device enables more optional alerting of hazardous conditions than a system of separate independent and discrete devices.

Claims

1. An aircraft flight hazard avoidance system comprising:

a plurality of flight hazard warning systems wherein each of said systems generates an alert signal indicating a potential flight hazard;

indicator means, responsive to said alert signals, for generating command indications corresponding to said alert signals for directing the operator of the aircraft to avoid said potential flight hazards; and

an alerting system, responsive to at least two of said alert signals generated concurrently, for selecting one of said concurrently generated alert signals for input to said indicator means wherein said selected alert signal represents the most critical flight hazard.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems includes a ground proximity warning system and a traffic collision warning system.

3. The system of claim 2 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems additionally includes a predictive windshear system.

4. The system of claim 3 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems additionally includes an enhanced ground proximity warning system.

5. The system of claim 4 wherein said plurality of flight hazard warning systems additionally includes a reactive windshear system.

6. The system of claim 1 wherein said alerting system includes flight path means for determining the projected flight path as suggested by each of said alert signals, wherein said alerting system includes threat condition means, responsive to said flight path means, for suppressing a generated one of said alert signals when said projected flight path as suggested by said alert signal would increase the threat to the aircraft.

7. The system of claim 1 wherein said alerting system includes comparing means for comparing a first one of said alert signals to a second subsequently generated one of said alert signals to determine whether said second alert signal represents a greater hazard probability than a hazard probability represented by said first alert signal and selecting for input to said indicator means the alert signal having the greatest hazard probability.

8. The system of claim 7 wherein said comparing means includes complementary means for determining if the corresponding command indications for said first and said second alert signals are complementary and selecting for input to said indicator means said second alert signal if said alert signals are not complementary.

9. The system of claim 1 wherein said alerting system includes a memory storing a plurality of alert priorities and computer means for selecting from said alert priorities said alert signal representing the most critical flight hazard.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein said alert priorities are based on an estimation of alert time and an estimation of the probability the hazard will result in an accident for each of said alert signals.

11. The system of claim 9 wherein said computer means in response to said alert priorities suppresses said alert signals which can not contribute to a pilot'"'"'s situation awareness and which can contribute to pilot confusion.

12. The system of claim 9 wherein said computer means in response to said alert priorities suppresses a subsequent one of said alert signals having the same expected pilot reaction as a previously generated one of said alert signals.

13. The system of claim 9 wherein said alert priorities additionally represent expected pilot reaction to said alert signals.

14. The system of claim 9 wherein said alert priorities are based on the altitude of the aircraft above ground.

15. The system of claim 14 wherein said flight hazard warning systems include a ground proximity warning system having modes 1-5, a traffic collision warning system and a windshear alert system.

16. The system of claim 15 wherein said computer means suppresses said alert signals from said windshear alert system and 3 of 5 modes of said ground proximity warning system above a first predetermined altitude.

17. The system of claim 16 wherein said computer means enables said alert signals from said windshear alert system while suppressing said alert signals from 3 of 5 modes of said ground proximity warning system below said first predetermined altitude above ground and above a second predetermined altitude above ground.

18. The system of claim 17 wherein said computer means enables said alert signals from 3 of 5 modes of said ground proximity warning system and suppresses selected ones of said alert signals from said traffic collision warning system below said second predetermined altitude and above a third predetermined altitude above ground.

19. The system of claim 1 including:

an I/O module adapted to receive flight data from the aircraft;

a central computer operatively connected to said I/O module and wherein at least two of said warning systems and said alerting system is implemented in said central computer; and

wherein said indicator means includes a speaker for generating aural alerts and a cockpit display for generating visual displays of alerts in response to said alert signals.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein said flight warning systems include a traffic collision warning system and wherein one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer is a ground proximity warning system.

21. The system of claim 20 including inhibit means for transmitting an inhibit signal from said alert system to said traffic collision warning system when said alert signal generated by said traffic collision warning system does not represent the most critical flight hazard, wherein said traffic collision warning system is inhibited when the inhibit signal is received.

22. The system of claim 20 wherein said I/O module is adapted to receive data from a weather radar and wherein one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer is a windshear warning system.

23. The system of claim 22 wherein said windshear system is a predictive windshear system and one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer is a reactive windshear system.

24. The system of claim 20 wherein one of said warning systems implemented in said central computer system is an enhanced ground proximity warning system.

25. The system of claim 19 wherein said central computer includes a plurality of processor units.

26. A method for providing a alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of:

monitoring sensor data;

analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards;

outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of aircraft altitude; and

generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

27. A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of:

monitoring sensor data;

analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards;

outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of a particular combination of hazardous flight conditions represented within said multiple alert condition; and

generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

28. A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of:

monitoring sensor data;

analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards;

outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of a flight path of the aircraft; and

generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

29. A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of:

monitoring sensor data;

analyzing said sensor data for a plurality of potential flight hazards;

outputting an alert signal according to a predetermined alert schedule when at least one potential flight hazard is detected, and wherein said alert schedule includes a procedure for arbitrating between a multiple of alert conditions as a function of anticipated corrective responses to the hazardous flight conditions represented within said multiple alert condition; and

generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

30. A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for an aircraft comprising the steps of:

(a) detecting if a first hazardous flight condition exits;

(b) determining if a second hazardous flight condition exists;

(c) comparing said first hazardous condition and said second hazardous condition according to a predefined criterion, wherein said step of comparing further comprises determining if corrective actions to said first and said second hazardous flight conditions are complementary; and

(d) issuing an alert based on a result of step (c).

31. The method of claim 30 wherein said step of comparing further comprises the step of comparing a relative hazard of each of said first and second hazardous flight conditions.

32. The method of claim 30 wherein said step of comparing further comprises the step of comparing a flight path associated with each of said first and second hazardous conditions.

33. A method for providing an alert of a hazardous flight condition for aircraft comprising the steps of:

detecting a hazardous condition;

determining if a projected flight path associated with an alert of said hazardous condition increases a threat condition of the aircraft; and

suppressing an alert of said hazardous flight condition if the flight path associated with said hazardous flight condition increases said threat condition.

34. A device for providing an alert within an aircraft of a hazardous flight condition, said device comprising:

an input for receiving sensor data;

a plurality of hazard detecting functions, each of said functions coupled to receive a given set of said sensor data, for determining if a hazard condition exists;

an alert generation device, having an input coupled to each of said plurality of hazard detecting functions, for evaluating an input signal indicative of the hazardous condition, and for outputting an alert signal based upon a predetermined alert schedule; and

a command generating device for generating command indications based on the outputted alert signal.

35. The device of claim 34 further comprising a fault tolerant database for coupling said plurality of hazard detecting functions to said alert generating device.