Method of assisting the conducting of a research project

• US 6,041,303 A
• Filed: 06/06/1997
• Issued: 03/21/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 06/07/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Edward Henry Mathews
• Original Assignee: Edward Henry Mathews
• Inventors: Mathews, Edward Henry
• Primary Examiner(s): MacDonald, Allen R.
• Assistant Examiner(s): CRECCA, MICHELE S
• Application Number:
  US08/870,481
• Time in Patent Office: 1,019 Days
• Field of Search: 705/1, 707/530, 707/531, 707/505, 707/506, 707/514, 707/515, 706/927
• US Class Current: 705/7.23
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06313 Resource planning in a project environment
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management

Abstract

A method of assisting the carrying out of a research process is implemented with the aid of specialized computer software. The software defines a sequence of predetermined research process steps. In a first step, predetermined prompts are generated which guide the researcher to enter data corresponding to the results of a literature survey, to set up a database which is used by subsequent steps. In a second step, prompts are generated to guide the researcher to enter proposal data, and selected data is retrieved from the database to include in a written proposal to a sponsor. The proposal data and the selected reference data from the first database are combined in a second database, which is used as the basis for the next step in the process. In the next step, the software generates prompts to assist the researcher in entering research results which are also stored in the second database in a predetermined format. The contents of the altered second database are then used to generate a research report in a partially predetermined format, as well as articles or papers, and presentations. The invention streamlines the research process and is particularly advantageous in assisting inexperienced researchers to follow the corrected procedure.

Claims

1. A method of assisting the conducting of a research process which comprises a plurality of steps, the method comprising;

defining a sequence of predetermined research process steps to be used by a researcher;

in a first step, generating predetermined first prompts to guide the researcher to enter reference data corresponding to the first prompts;

storing the entered reference data in a first database having a structure which is at least partially predetermined;

in a second step, generating second prompts to guide the researcher to enter proposal data corresponding to the second prompts, and determining requirements for the retrieval of data from the first database;

Automatically retrieving selected reference data from the first database, at least partially according to requirements of the second step;

storing the selected reference data and the proposal data in a second database for use in at least one further step of the method; and

generating a first report including at least a portion of the selected reference data and the proposal data.

2. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first database stores the entered reference data in a hierarchical tree structure.

3. A method according to claim 2 wherein the tree structure includes a plurality of user-defined headings.

4. A method according to claim 1 wherein the reference data comprises the results of a literature survey.

5. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first prompts include prompts for information on the source of the reference data, identification of the reference data, authors of the reference data and dates of publication of the reference data.

6. A method according to claim 1 including entering at least one user-defined first prompt.

7. A method according to claim 1 wherein the first report which is generated, including at least a portion of the selected reference data and the proposal data, is compiled as a project proposal for presentation to a sponsor.

8. A method according to claim 7 wherein the second prompts are selected from prompts for information on the project background, the project vision, the project objectives, the beneficiaries of the project, specifications of the project output, how beneficiaries will implement the project results or output, the impact of the project on the beneficiaries and the project output.

9. A method according to claim 7 wherein the second prompts are selected from prompts for information on the basic project details, the project leader, the personnel costs of the project, the operating costs of the project, the sub-contractor costs of the project, tax implications of the project, funding arrangements for the project, a financial summary, the amount requested from the sponsor, details of project evaluators, assumptions on which the project planning is based, contingency plans for each assumption, the generation on a Gantt chart, a proposed payment schedule, details on a company involved in the research and curricula vitae of persons involved in the project.

10. A method according to claim 1 wherein the step of generating the second prompts comprises the step of guiding the researcher to enter work plan data corresponding to the second prompts, the work plan data being stored in the second database.

11. A method according to claim 10 wherein the entered work plan data defines the structure of the second database.

12. A method according to claim 11 wherein the second prompts are selected from prompts for information on main project planning steps, secondary project planning steps and motivation information.

13. A method according to claim 1 including, in a third step, generating third prompts to guide the researcher to enter result data corresponding to the third prompts and storing the entered result data in the second database together with data stored previously in the second database.

14. A method according to claim 13 wherein the third prompts include prompts for information on research results corresponding to headings in the second database.

15. A method according to claim 1 including, in a fourth step, generating fourth prompts to guide the researcher to select and/or enter report data corresponding to the fourth prompts for inclusion in a research report.

16. A method according to claim 15 including generating a research report comprising report data and data selected from the second database, the research report being compiled in a format which is at least partially predetermined by the structure of the second database.

17. A method according to claim 16 including generating an abbreviated article and/or conference paper and/or a presentation comprising data selected from the second database.

18. A software package for use in assisting the conducting of a research project which comprises a plurality of steps, the software comprising:

a reference database module arranged to generate predetermined first prompts to guide the researcher to enter reference data corresponding to said first prompts, and to store the entered reference data in a first database having a structure which is at least partially predetermined;

a work database module arranged to generate predetermined second prompts to guide the researcher to enter proposal data corresponding to said second prompts, to automatically retrieve selected reference data from the first database and to store the selected reference data and the proposal data in a second database for re-use; and

an interface module arranged to extract selected data from the second database and to generate a first report comprising the selected data and the proposal data, so that the first report has a format which is at least partially determined by the structure of the second database.

19. A software package according to claim 18 wherein the work database module includes a proposal sub-module for generating prompts to guide the researcher to enter proposal data, and a planning sub-module for generating prompts to guide the researcher to enter planning data.

20. A software package according to claim 19 wherein the work database module operates to define the structure of the second database partially from the structure of the first database and partly from the entered planning data.

21. A software package according to claim 18 wherein the work database module is arranged to generate predetermined third prompts to guide the researcher to enter result data corresponding to said third prompts and to store the entered result data in the second database together with data stored previously in the second database.

22. A software package according to claim 21 wherein the work database module is arranged to generate fourth prompts to guide the researcher to select and/or enter report data corresponding to said fourth prompts for inclusion in a research report and to generate, via the interface module, a research report comprising report data and data selected from the second database, so that the research report has a format which is at least partially predetermined by the structure of the second database.