Limited scan phased array antenna

• US 6,043,791 A
• Filed: 04/27/1998
• Issued: 03/28/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 04/27/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Sensis Pty Limited (Telstra Group Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: Sensis Pty Limited (Telstra Group Ltd.)
• Inventors: Kinsey, Richard R.
• Primary Examiner(s): Wong, Don
• Assistant Examiner(s): PHAN, THO GIA
• Application Number:
  US09/067,120
• Time in Patent Office: 701 Days
• Field of Search: 343/700, 343/754, 343/776, 343/777, 343/778, 343/844, 343/853, 343/858
• US Class Current: 343/853
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 21/22 Antenna units of the array energised non-uniformly in amplitude or phase, e.g. tapered array or binomial array
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 3/26 varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture H01Q3/12, H01Q3/22, H01Q3/24 take precedence

Abstract

A phased array antenna is designed for scanning a narrow beam over an angular sector that is wide in one plane, and narrow in another, while using a minimum number of phase steering controls. High directivity elements occupy a rectangularly shaped area which is large in one direction relative to a second direction, the elements being staggered in position with neighboring elements to suppress near-in grating lobes. The elements are independent and identical to one another so that conventional array beamforming techniques may be utilized.

Claims

1. A two-dimensional phased array antenna for scanning a narrow beam over a wide angular sector, said antenna comprising:

a plurality of high directivity elements disposed in a substantially rectangularly array, each of said elements having a high aspect ratio, said elements of said array being arranged in a staggered relationship for suppressing near-in grating lobes.

2. An antenna as recited in claim 1, wherein each of said directivity elements are substantially identical.

3. An antenna as recited in claim 2, wherein said angular sector is wide in a first azimuthal direction and is narrow in an elevational direction.

4. An antenna as recited in claim 3, wherein said directivity elements are arranged in adjacent columns which are staggered relative to each other.

5. An antenna as recited in claim 4, wherein said elements are staggered in the elevational direction by approximately one half of the major dimension of the element.

6. An antenna as recited in claim 5, wherein each of said staggered elements has a nonuniform amplitude taper along their major dimension, said taper leading to a substantially lossless power density of said antenna.

7. An antenna as recited in claim 6, wherein the taper in power density along the major dimensions of two adjacent elements in an overlap region thereof is of the form:

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">P.sub.1 (ξ

)=1-P.sub.2 (ξ

)

In which P₁ (ξ

) and P₂ (ξ

) represent tapers of adjacent elements in the overlap region;

and ξ

is the aperture variable normalized to a maximum of unity.

8. A two-dimensional array antenna comprising a plurality of identical high-directivity elements arranged in a substantially rectangular-shaped array, each of said elements in said array having an aspect ratio which is greater than 4:

1, said elements being arranged in a staggered pattern defined by adjacent element columns, wherein adjacent columns of elements are staggered by approximately one half of the major dimension of the element.

9. An antenna as recited in claim 8, wherein adjacent elements have a tapered power density along their major dimension so as to produce a uniform aperture power density in an overlap region common to said elements.

10. An antenna as recited in claim 8, wherein the aspect ratio is at least 8:

1.