Accounting system and method for a nominal bit rate network service

• US 6,047,326 A
• Filed: 03/20/1997
• Issued: 04/04/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 03/20/1997
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Nokia Telecommunications Oy (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Nokia Telecommunications Oy (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: Kilkki, Matti Kalevi
• Primary Examiner(s): Rinehart, Mark H.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Thompson, Marc D
• Application Number:
  US08/822,270
• Time in Patent Office: 1,111 Days
• Field of Search: 370/251, 370/253, 370/397, 370/395, 370/232, 370/234, 379/93.01, 379/93.08, 379/114, 379/140, 379/130, 379/131, 379/115, 379/133, 395/183.13, 395/200.54, 705/1, 705/32, 714/37, 709/224, 709/223, 709/228
• US Class Current: 709/228
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 2012/5651 Priority, marking, classes
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 65/1069 Session establishment or de-establishment
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 65/1101 Session protocols
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 65/80 Responding to QoS
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 69/24 Negotiation of communication capabilities
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 11/0478 Provisions for broadband connections

Abstract

A system and method for charging for usage of a network service connection. The network includes access nodes which provide user access to core nodes of the network. At an access node, the traffic of connections associated with the access node is measured. A nominal bit rate (NBR) associated with the access node is used together with the traffic measurement to compute a priority level at the access node. The value of NBR represents an expected, but not guaranteed, bit rate associated with a particular user or connection. The connection may be a real-time or a non-real-time connection. Information elements, transmitted from the access node to a core network node, are each assigned one of several priority levels, and cells are either accepted or discarded based on priority level and the status of one or more buffers at the core node. A charging schedule, based on a maximum allowed NBR established for the user, accounts for both a fixed or non-fixed monthly fee and a time dependent fee portion. The charging scheme may take into account that the NBR may be different for upstream and downstream transmissions. A charging counter, which accounts for the cost of connection usage, may be updated on a periodic basis, such as once a second for example, or on a non-periodic basis.

Claims

1. A method of charging for usage of a connection between a network access node and a node of a network, comprising:

transmitting cells of information over the connection in accordance with a nominal bit rate service comprising;

establishing a nominal bit rate service connection according to a request received by a network operator from a user for the nominal bit rate service connection;

measuring an actual bit rate of the connection for the nominal bit rate service connection; and

changing a probability of cell acceptance at the network node for the nominal bit rate service connection in response to a change in the actual bit rate relative to the nominal bit rate; and

computing a cost for usage of the connection based upon the established nominal bit rate service connection.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein changing the probability of cell acceptance at the network node comprises increasing the probability of cell acceptance at the network node in response to a decrease in the actual bit rate relative to the nominal bit rate.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein changing the probability of cell acceptance at the network node comprises decreasing the probability of cell acceptance at the network node in response to an increase in the actual bit rate relative to the nominal bit rate.

4. The method of claim 1, further comprising designating the connection as a real-time connection or a non-real-time connection.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein computing the cost for usage of the connection further comprises computing the cost using the nominal bit rate and a connection time, the connection time representing a period of time during which the connection is used.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein computing the cost for usage of the connection further comprises:

designating a maximum nominal bit rate for the connection, the maximum nominal bit rate representing a limit which the nominal bit rate is not permitted to exceed; and

computing the cost using the nominal bit rate and the maximum nominal bit rate.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein computing the cost for usage of the connection further comprises:

designating a maximum nominal bit rate for the connection, the maximum nominal bit rate representing a limit which the nominal bit rate is not permitted to exceed;

establishing a first fee rate and a second fee rate; and

computing the cost using the nominal bit rate modified by the first fee rate and the maximum nominal bit rate modified by the second fee rate.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein computing the cost for usage of the connection further comprises computing the cost using the nominal bit rate for upstream and downstream transmissions, respectively.