Method for determining the precipitation ratio by double polarization radar and meteorological radar for implementing such process

• US 6,061,013 A
• Filed: 06/26/1998
• Issued: 05/09/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 12/26/1995
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Thomson-CSF (Thales SA)
• Original Assignee: Thomson-CSF (Thales SA)
• Inventors: Sauvageot, Henri, Beguin, Daniel, Devinne, Regis
• Primary Examiner(s): Pihulic, Daniel T.
• Application Number:
  US09/091,828
• Time in Patent Office: 683 Days
• Field of Search: 342/26, 702/3, 73/170.16
• US Class Current: 342/26.00R
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 13/95 for meteorological use
• CPC Class Codes: G01S 7/025 involving the transmission of linearly polarised waves
• CPC Class Codes: Y02A 90/10 Information and communication technologies [ICT] supporting adaptation to climate change, e.g. for weather forecasting or climate simulation

Abstract

A method for determining precipitation rate including on the basis of the signals received on the two polarization channels H and V of the radar, in firstly determining an estimate of the precipitation rates R.sub.α in each range gate i along the radar beam for a single polarization, then a first estimated value (I₁) of the integral of the precipitation rates and, finally, on the basis of the attenuated reflectivity coefficient (Z_Hα (r)), an estimate of the unattenuated differential reflectivity coefficient (Z_DRs (r)). Furthermore, the measured value of the attenuated differential reflectivity coefficient (Z_DRs (r)) is determined, and the integral (I₂) of the precipitation rates is deduced therefrom, then is compared with the first estimated value (I₁) so as to iteratively adjust a parameter (α) of the method when applied to the polarization H alone. When α has been adjusted, corrected values of the unattenuated reflectivity coefficient and the precipitation rate are provided.

Claims

1. Method for determining the precipitation rate and reflectivity factor of a hydrometeor using pulsed radar operating at a wavelength which is attenuated by the said hydrometeor, the said radar being a dual polarization radar delivering a double series of measurements of the attenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Ha (r), Z_Va (r)) for the various range gates according to each of the polarizations, the said method being characterized in that it comprises the following steps:

A) in each range gate of the radar, determining a first estimate of the precipitation rate (R_s) on the basis of the reflectivity factor measured for a single polarization, by a combination of the equations connecting the reflectivity factor with the precipitation rate and the attenuation coefficient for a single polarization with the precipitation rate;

B) on the basis of the said first estimate of the precipitation rate, obtaining an estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs);

C) from the said estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs) and the radar measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa), deducing an estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP); and

D) attempting to obtain equality between the integral (I₁ (r, R)) of the precipitation rate estimated in step A for a single polarization of the radar and the integral (I₂ (r, R)) of the precipitation rate deduced from the said differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP), by iterative adjustment of one of the parameters (α

, β

) in the equation connecting the reflectivity factor with the precipitation rate, so as to make it possible to extract the corrected values of the unattenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Hs (r)) and the precipitation rate (R_s (r)).

2. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that step A) comprises the following steps:

a) for a first of the said series of measurements (Z_Ha (r)), calculating estimated values of the precipitation rate (R_i) for the various range gates (1 to n-1) on the basis of arbitrarily fixed parameters (α

, β

);

b) from the said estimated values of the precipitation rate (R_i), deducing a first estimated value (I, (r, R)) characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitation, the said first estimated value being the integral of the precipitation rate estimated for a single polarization;

c) on the basis of the said first estimated value (I₁ (r, R)) and a first series of measurements (Z_Ha (r)), determining an estimated value of the unattenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Hs (r)) and the corrected precipitation rate (R_s).

3. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the said step B) comprises the following step:

d) on the basis of the said estimated value of the corrected precipitation rate (R_s) and a given drop-size distribution (DSD), calculating an estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs (r)).

4. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the said step C) comprises the following steps:

e) on the basis of the said double series of measurements of the attenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Ha (r), Z_Va (r)), calculating the measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa (r));

f) from the measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa (r)) and the estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs (r)) obtained during step d), deducing an estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP).

5. Method according to claim 1, characterized in that the said step D) comprises the following steps:

g) from the said estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP), deducing a second estimated value (I₂ (r, R)) characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitation, namely the integral of the precipitation rate;

h) comparing the said first (I₁ (r, R)) and second (I₂ (r, R)) estimated values characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitations;

i) if the said comparison according to step h) indicates that the said first and second estimated values are different, changing at least one of the said parameters (α

, β

) in step a) and repeating steps a) to h);

j) if the said comparison according to step h) indicates that the said first and second estimated values are equal, extracting the said estimated values of the unattenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Hs (r)) and of the corrected precipitation rate (R_s).

6. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that step a) consists in:

a.1) averaging the said measurements (Z_Ha (r)) in the said first series over N pulses of the radar;

a.2) for each range gate (i), calculating estimated values of the precipitation rate (R_i) on the basis of arbitrarily fixed parameters (α

, β

), according to the equation;

##EQU6##

7. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that step b) consists in:

b.1) on the basis of the estimated values of the precipitation rate (R_i), calculating the attenuation coefficients (α

_i) in each range gate, according to the equation;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">α

.sub.i /k.sub.H =R.sub.i.sup.γ

.sbsp.H

where k_H and γ

_H are predetermined parameters for a given temperature and a given drop-size distribution; and

b.2) from these attenuation coefficients (α

_i), deducing the said first estimated value (I₁ (r,R)), according to the equation;

##EQU7## where n is the number of range gates for a distance r from the radar.

8. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that step c) consists in:

c.1) on the basis of the said first estimated value (I₁ (r,R)), calculating an attenuation value A such that;

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">A=2Δ

rk.sub.H I.sub.1 (r,R)

where Δ

r is the width of a range gate;

c.2) averaging the said measurements (Z_Hz (r)) in the said first series over N pulses of the radar;

c.3) taking the sum of the said attenuation A and the averaged value of the attenuated reflectivity factor Z_Hα

(r) in order to obtain an estimated value Z_Hs (r) of the unattenuated reflectivity factor; and

c.4) calculating an estimated value R_s of the corrected precipitation rate, according to the equation;

##EQU8##

9. Method according to claim 4, characterized in that step e) consists in:

e.1) taking the ratio of the measurements in the series of the said double series (Z_Hα

(r),Z_Vα

(r)), in order to obtain the values of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRα

(r)) of the radar;

e.2) averaging the said values of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor over N pulses of the radar.

10. Method according to claim 5, characterized in that step f) consists in taking the difference between the said estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (ZDRs(r)) obtained according to step d) and the said averaged value of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRα

(r)), in order to obtain an estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP (r)) for a radar path.

11. Method according to claim 5, characterized in that step g) consists in, on the basis of the said estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP (r)), calculating the said second estimated value I₂ (r,R), according to the equation:

##EQU9## where k_v is a parameter predetermined, in the same way as k_h, for the second series of measurements (Z_Vα

(r)).

12. Dual polarization meteorological radar operating with pulses at a wavelength which is attenuated by hydrometeors, for determining the precipitation rate and the reflectivity factor, the said radar having:

a dual polarization antenna (1) associated with means (2, 3,

     4) for extracting the modes corresponding to two orthogonal polarization channels H and V;

a transmitter (5,

     6) delivering pulses to the two channels of the said antenna;

at least one reception channel (7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19;

10, 12, 13, 16, 18,

     20) for processing the signals output by the two orthogonal polarization channels;

the said radar being characterized in that it has a digital signal processing device (21) designed for implementing the method according to claim 1.

13. Radar according to claim 12, characterized in that, at the output of the said reception channels, it comprises logarithmic amplifiers (17, 18) for increasing the dynamic range, and in that the said digital processing device (21) has conversion means (30, 36, 40) at its input in order to recover the values of the received signals.

14. Radar according to claim 12, characterized in that it furthermore comprises two Doppler reception channels (22 to 24;

25 to

     27), associated respectively with the outputs of the reception channels for the two polarizations.

15. Radar according to claim 12, characterized in that it has a single reception channel, associated with input and output switching means controlled synchronously in order to process the two polarizations alternately, the switching rate being such that the signals received in the two polarizations are not decorrelated during the switching time.

16. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the said step B) comprises the following step:

d) on the basis of the said estimated value of the corrected precipitation rate (R_s) and a given drop-size distribution (DSD), calculating an estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs (r)).

17. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the said step C) comprises the following steps:

e) on the basis of the said double series of measurements of the attenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Ha (r), Z_Va (r)), calculating the measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa (r));

f) from the measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa (r)) and the estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs (r)) obtained during step d), deducing an estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP).

18. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the said step C) comprises the following steps:

e) on the basis of the said double series of measurements of the attenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Ha (r), Z_Va (r)), calculating the measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa (r));

f) from the measurement of the attenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRa (r)) and the estimated value of the unattenuated differential reflectivity factor (Z_DRs (r)) obtained during step d), deducing an estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP).

19. Method according to claim 2, characterized in that the said step D) comprises the following steps:

g) from the said estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP), deducing a second estimated value (I₂ (r, R)) characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitation, namely the integral of the precipitation rate;

h) comparing the said first (I₁ (r, R)) and second (I₂ (r, R)) estimated values characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitations;

i) if the said comparison according to step h) indicates that the said first and second estimated values are different, changing at least one of the said parameters (α

, β

) in step a) and repeating steps a) to h);

j) if the said comparison according to step h) indicates that the said first and second estimated values are equal, extracting the said estimated values of the unattenuated reflectivity factor (Z_Hs (r)) and of the corrected precipitation rate (R_s).

20. Method according to claim 3, characterized in that the said step D) comprises the following steps:

g) from the said estimated value of the differential polarimetric attenuation (A_DP), deducing a second estimated value (I₂ (r, R)) characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitation, namely the integral of the precipitation rate;

h) comparing the said first (I₁ (r, R)) and second (I₂ (r, R)) estimated values characteristic of the attenuation due to the precipitations;

i) if the said comparison according to step h) indicates that the said first and second estimated values are different, changing at least one of the said parameters (α

, β

) in step a) and repeating steps a) to h);

j) if the said comparison according to step h) indicates that the said first and second estimated values are equal, extracting the said estimated values of the unattenuated reflectivity factor (Z_HS (r)) and of the corrected precipitation rate (R_s).