Position sensing for force feedback devices

• US 6,067,077 A
• Filed: 08/21/1998
• Issued: 05/23/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 04/10/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Immersion Corporation
• Original Assignee: Immersion Corporation
• Inventors: Martin, Kenneth M., Braun, Adam C., Bruneau, Ryan D.
• Primary Examiner(s): Luu, Matthew
• Assistant Examiner(s): PIZIALI, JEFFREY J
• Application Number:
  US09/138,309
• Time in Patent Office: 641 Days
• Field of Search: 345/156-157, 345/161-163, 345/158, 345/159, 345/184, 318/568.1, 463/38, 463/30, 463/36, 463/37
• US Class Current: 345/161
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/21 characterised by their sensors, purposes or types
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/22 Setup operations, e.g. calibration, key configuration or button assignment
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/24 Constructional details thereof, e.g. game controllers with detachable joystick handles
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 13/285 Generating tactile feedback signals via the game input device, e.g. force feedback
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 2300/1006 having additional degrees of freedom
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 2300/1018 Calibration; Key and button assignment
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 2300/1037 being specially adapted for converting control signals received from the game device into a haptic signal, e.g. using force feedback
• CPC Class Codes: A63F 2300/1043 being characterized by constructional details

Abstract

Improvements in accurately sensing a user manipulandum of a force feedback device. A force feedback device, coupled to a host computer, includes an actuator for outputting forces on a manipulandum and a sensor for detecting a position of the manipulandum. In one feature, a raw sensor value representing manipulandum position is adjusted based on compliance between sensor and manipulandum, where the adjustment can be based on a compliance constant and an output force. In another feature, a range of motion of the manipulandum is dynamically calibrated from startup. One boundary value of an assigned initial range is set equal to a received sensor value if the sensor value is outside the initial range, and the other boundary value is adjusted to maintain the size of the initial range unless the other boundary value has already been sensed outside the initial range. In another feature, manipulandum position is accurately sensed by filtering raw sensor values for overshoot values occurring at limits to manipulandum motion and using the filtered value in the dynamic calibration. In another feature, sensing inaccuracies caused by compliance in the device are decreased by normalizing a raw sensor value to a normalized range of motion that includes a saturation zone at each end of the range that adjusts sensor values over a saturation level to the saturation level.

Claims

1. A method for compensating for sensing inaccuracies contributed to by compliance in the mechanical systems of a force feedback device, the force feedback device being coupled to a host computer and including at least one actuator for outputting forces felt by said user, the method comprising:

reading a raw sensor value representing a position of a manipulandum of said force feedback device in a range of motion of said manipulandum, said manipulandum being physically contacted and manipulated by a user;

adjusting said raw sensor value based on a compliance of said force feedback device between a sensor and said manipulandum, said adjustment compensating for said compliance to provide a more accurate position of said manipulandum; and

using said adjusted sensor value to represent said position of said manipulandum.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said adjusting of said raw sensor value includes adjusting said raw sensor value by a value determined based on a compliance constant and a current output force, wherein said compliance constant is previously determined.

3. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising using said raw sensor value for determining closed-loop position-dependent forces by said force feedback device, and wherein said adjusted sensor value is reported to said host computer to update an application program implemented by said host computer.

4. A method as recited in claim 3 wherein said position-dependent forces are determined by a microprocessor local to said interface device and separate from said host computer.

5. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said sensor value is obtained from a sensor coupled to said actuator of said force feedback device.

6. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said force feedback device includes a belt drive for transmitting forces from said actuator to said manipulandum.

7. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein a microprocessor separate from said host computer and local to said force feedback device performs said adjusting.

8. A method as recited in claim 7 wherein said adjusted sensor value is reported to said host computer as said position of said manipulandum, wherein said host computer uses said adjusted sensor value when updating an application program implemented by said host computer.

9. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising filtering said raw value for overshoot sensor values occurring at limits to said range of motion of said manipulandum.

10. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising dynamically calibrating said range of motion of said manipulandum by adjusting minimum and maximum values of said range of motion based on the extent of motion of said manipulandum up to a current point in time.

11. A method as recited in claim 1 wherein said manipulandum is a joystick and wherein said joystick can be moved in two degrees of freedom, each of said degrees of freedom providing a different raw sensor value to be adjusted.

12. A method as recited in claim 1 further comprising normalizing said raw sensor value to a normalized range of motion, said normalizing including providing a saturation zone at ends of said normalized range of motion that adjusts sensor values over a saturation limit provided at said ends of said normalized range of motion to a saturation level, wherein said normalized sensor value is provided to said host computer.

13. A force feedback device coupled to a host computer, the force feedback device comprising:

a manipulandum physically contacted and manipulable by a user;

a linkage mechanism providing a degree of freedom to said manipulandum;

at least one actuator coupled to said linkage mechanism, said actuator operative to output a force on said manipulandum in said degree of freedom;

at least one sensor operative to sense a position of said manipulandum in said degree of freedom and to output a raw sensor value representing said position; and

a local microprocessor, separate from and communicating with said host computer, said local microprocessor receiving said raw sensor value from said sensor and adjusting said raw sensor value based on a compliance between said sensor and said manipulandum in said force feedback device, said adjustment compensating for said compliance to provide a more accurate position of said manipulandum, and wherein said local microprocessor outputs said adjusted sensor value to said host computer as said position of said manipulandum.

14. A force feedback device as recited in claim 13 wherein said a linkage mechanism providing said manipulandum with first and second rotary degrees of freedom, said linkage mechanism and includes a chain of four rotatably-coupled members coupled to ground at each end of said chain.

15. A force feedback device as recited in claim 13 further comprising a belt drive transmission coupled between said actuator and said linkage mechanism, said belt drive transmission including a flat belt.

16. A force feedback device as recited in claim 15 wherein said manipulandum includes a joystick.

17. A force feedback device as recited in claim 15 wherein said at least one sensor is a relative digital encoder.

18. A force feedback device as recited in claim 13 wherein said at least one sensor is coupled to said at least one actuator of said force feedback device such that said sensor detects rotation of a shaft of said actuator.

19. A force feedback device as recited in claim 18 wherein said microprocessor dynamically calibrates said range of motion of said manipulandum by adjusting minimum and maximum values of said range of motion based on the extent of motion of said manipulandum up to a current point in time.

20. A force feedback device as recited in claim 13 wherein said local microprocessor uses said raw sensor value to determine closed-loop forces that are dependent on a position of said user object.

21. A method for dynamically calibrating a sensed range of motion of a manipulandum of a force feedback device, said force feedback device being coupled to a host computer and including an actuator and at least one relative sensor, the method comprising:

a) providing a predetermined initial range of movement for said manipulandum when said force feedback device is initially powered, said initial range including two boundary values, said boundary values including a maximum value and a minimum value;

b) receiving a sensor value representing a position of said manipulandum of said force feedback device in said range of movement as said manipulandum is moved;

c) setting said maximum value or said minimum value to said received sensor value if said received sensor value is outside said initial range; and

d) adjusting said other of said boundary values not set in step c) to maintain said initial range between said maximum value and said minimum value unless said other of said boundary values has been previously detected to be outside said initial range.

22. A method as recited in claim 21 wherein said initial range is greater than zero and is less than an entire physical range of motion of said manipulandum.

23. A method as recited in claim 22 wherein said initial range is about one-half an approximate full range of said sensor.

24. A method as recited in claim 21 wherein said manipulandum is considered to be positioned at about a center of said initial range of movement when said force feedback device is initially powered.

25. A method as recited in claim 21 wherein said manipulandum is a joystick handle.

26. A method for providing accurate sensing of position of a manipulandum in a force feedback device that includes compliance between said manipulandum and a position sensor of said force feedback device, the force feedback device including at least one actuator for outputting forces and being coupled to a host computer, the method comprising:

reading a raw sensor value representing a position of a manipulandum of said force feedback device in a range of motion of said manipulandum, said manipulandum being phyisically contacted and manipulable by a user;

filtering said raw sensor value for overshoot sensor values occurring at limits to said range of motion of said manipulandum; and

dynamically calibrating said range of motion of said manipulandum by adjusting minimum and maximum values of said range of motion based on the extent of motion of said manipulandum up to a current point in time, wherein said dynamic calibration uses said filtered sensor values.

27. A method as recited in claim 26 further comprising using said unfiltered raw sensor values for determining a position of said manipulandum in said range of motion.

28. A method as recited in claim 26 wherein said filtering includes using a low pass filter on said raw sensor data.

29. A method as recited in claim 26 wherein said dynamically calibrating includes assigning an initial range with initial maximum and initial minimum values to said manipulandum.

30. A method as recited in claim 29 wherein said minimum and maximum values are adjusted to keep said initial range between said minimum and maximum values until both said minimum and maximum values are detected outside said initial range.

31. A method as recited in claim 29 wherein if said filtered sensor value is below said minimum value, further comprising:

i) setting said minimum value to said filtered sensor value, and

ii) adjusting said maximum value to maintain a constant range from said minimum value, unless said maximum value has previously been detected outside said initial range.

33. A method as recited in claim 26 further comprising adjusting said raw sensor value based on a compliance of said force feedback device, said adjustment compensating for said compliance to provide a more accurate position of said manipulandum and reporting said adjusted sensor value as said position of said manipulandum to said host computer.

34. A method as recited in claim 26 further comprising normalizing said raw sensor value to a normalized range, wherein said normalized value is reported to said host computer.

35. A method as recited in claim 34 wherein said normalizing includes providing a saturation zone at each limit of said normalized range, said saturation zone causing said sensor values over a saturation level provided at said ends of said normalized range of motion to be adjusted to said saturation level.

32. A method as recited in clam 31 wherein if said filtered sensor value is above said maximum value, further comprising:

i) setting a maximum value to said filtered sensor value; and

ii) adjusting said minimum value to maintain a constant range from said maximum value, unless said minimum value has previously been detected outside said initial range.

36. A method for compensating for sensing inaccuracies contributed to by compliance in the mechanical systems of a force feedback device, the force feedback device including at least one actuator for outputting forces and being coupled to a host computer, the method comprising:

reading a raw sensor value representing a position of a manipulandum of said force feedback device in a range of motion of said manipulandum, said manipulandum being physically contacted and manipulable by a user;

normalizing said raw sensor value to a normalized range of motion, said normalizing including providing a saturation zone at each end of said normalized range of motion that adjusts sensor values over a saturation level provided at said ends of said normalized range of motion to said saturation level; and

reporting said normalized sensor value to said host computer, wherein said host computer updates an application program using said normalized sensor value.

37. A method as recited in claim 36 wherein said normalizing is provided according to a normalizing function, said normalizing function being a linear function having said saturation levels at said ends of said linear function, wherein said normalizing function has a greater slope between said ends of said range of motion than a normalizing function without said saturation zones.

38. A method as recited in claim 36 further comprising adjusting said raw sensor value based on a compliance of said force feedback device, said adjustment compensating for said compliance to provide a more accurate position of said manipulandum.

39. A method as recited in claim 38 wherein said adjusted sensor value is normalized to said normalized range of motion and is reported to said host computer.

40. A method as recited in claim 39 wherein said raw sensor value is normalized to said normalized range of motion and is used for local determination of forces by a local microprocessor separate from said host computer.

41. A method as recited in claim 40 wherein said local determination of forces includes determining a closed-loop condition force, said closed-loop condition force including one of a spring force, a damping force, and a texture force.

42. A method as recited in claim 36 further comprising dynamically calibrating said range of motion of said manipulandum by adjusting minimum and maximum values of said range of motion based on the extent of motion of said manipulandum up to a current point in time.

43. A method for dynamically calibrating a sensed range of motion of a manipulandum of a force feedback device during usage of the device, said force feedback device being coupled to a host computer and including an actuator and at least one sensor, the method comprising:

providing a sensing range of motion for said manipulandum less than a full range of motion of said manipulandum, said sensing range having a maximum value and a minimum value;

reading a sensor value using said at least one sensor, said sensor value representing a position of said manipulandum of said force feedback device as said manipulandum is moved;

outputting a force on said manipulandum by said actuator approximately concurrently with said reading of said sensor value;

setting said maximum value of said sensing range to said sensor value if said sensor value is greater than said maximum value, wherein said maximum value is not set if said force is being output in a direction towards a maximum physical limit past said maximum value; and

setting said minimum value of said sensing range to said sensor value if said sensor value is less than said minimum value, wherein said minimum value is not set if said force is being output in a direction towards a minimum physical limit past said minimum value.

44. A method as recited in claim 43 further comprising repeating said reading, outputting and setting said values for a plurality of successive sensor values.