Method for receiving signals from a constellation of satellites in close geosynchronous orbit

• US 6,075,969 A
• Filed: 01/09/1997
• Issued: 06/13/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 06/17/1994
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Datasec Corporation
• Original Assignee: Terrastar, Inc.
• Inventors: Lusignan, Bruce B.
• Primary Examiner(s): Peng, John K.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Miller, John W.
• Application Number:
  US08/781,165
• Time in Patent Office: 1,251 Days
• Field of Search: 343/781 P, 343/781 R, 343/781 CA, 343/840, 343/DIG. 2, 343/913, 343/914, 455/3.2, 455/269, 455/272
• US Class Current: 455/3.02
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 13/02 Waveguide horns
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 19/12 wherein the surfaces are concave H01Q19/18 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 19/13 the primary radiating source being a single radiating element, e.g. a dipole, a slot, a waveguide termination H01Q19/15 takes precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 19/132 Horn reflector antennas; Off-set feeding
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 19/17 the primary radiating source comprising two or more radiating elements H01Q19/15, H01Q25/00 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 21/24 Combinations of antenna units polarised in different directions for transmitting or receiving circularly and elliptically polarised waves or waves linearly polarised in any direction circularly polarised patch antennas H01Q9/0428; circularly polarised horns H01Q13/0241; cross-polarised horns H01Q13/0258; polarisation converters H01Q15/242; cross-polarised rear feeds H01Q19/136; crossed polarisation dual antenna H01Q25/001
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 21/28 Combinations of substantially independent non-interacting antenna units or systems multiple beam H01Q25/00
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 25/00 Antennas or antenna systems providing at least two radiating patterns arrangements for changing or varying the orientation or the shape of the directional pattern H01Q3/00
• CPC Class Codes: H01Q 3/26 varying the relative phase or relative amplitude of energisation between two or more active radiating elements; varying the distribution of energy across a radiating aperture H01Q3/12, H01Q3/22, H01Q3/24 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/18517 Transmission equipment in earth stations
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/1858 Arrangements for data transmission on the physical system, i.e. for data bit transmission between network components
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/18597 Arrangements for system physical machines management, i.e. for construction, operations control, administration, maintenance
• CPC Class Codes: H04H 40/90 specially adapted for satellite broadcast receiving
• CPC Class Codes: Y02D 30/70 in wireless communication networks

Abstract

A C-Band or Ku-Band satellite communication system uses a relatively small receiving antenna while operating within current FCC designated bandwidth and using existing satellite configurations. Aperture synthesis techniques create nulls in orbit locations from which potential interference is expected. Bandwidth inefficient modulation techniques reduce transmission power flux density. Video compression reduces the power necessary to transmit video information. These three features make possible a receiving antenna with a receiving area equivalent to that of a three foot diameter dish, at C-Band frequencies. Comparable reductions are possible for Ku-, Ka-, S- and L-Band systems. Compressing the data reduces the required transmitted power by a factor of ten. Spreading the bandwidth reduces the power density below the FCC limitation. However, reducing the antenna diameter increases the beam width of the antenna, hence, the smaller antenna can no longer discriminate between adjacent C-Band satellites in their current orbital configuration. By designing the receiving antenna with nulls in orbital locations where potentially interfering satellites would be located, the small antenna avoids this interference. The same general technique is possible for a Ku-Band Antenna system. The FCC power limits are higher at Ku-Band than C-Band, however, losses due to rain absorption and thermal noise are higher at Ku-Band frequencies. Nevertheless, equivalent size savings on Ku-Band antennas are possible with the combination of the above techniques, when tailored for the Ku-Band environment.

Claims

1. A method for receiving a signal being transmitted from a constellation of satellites, which includes a central satellite and a plurality of satellites spaced at regular angular intervals from the central satellite relative to a receiving antenna, whose main lobe encompasses the central satellite and the plurality of satellites, said method comprising the steps of:

a) providing gain in the antenna for a signal being transmitted from the central satellite; and

b) inhibiting interfering signals being transmitted from the plurality of satellites by creating nulls in the main lobe of the antenna that match the regular angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step b) of inhibiting further comprises providing a gap in the receiving antenna between a central reflector and two side reflectors, wherein a width of the gap and widths of the center reflector and two side reflectors are functions of the regular angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the step a) of providing gain provides gain for the signal being transmitted from the central satellite with the central reflector in the receiving antenna.

4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the width of the gap and widths of the central and two side reflectors are selected so that energy from the interfering signals that impinges on the central reflector cancels out energy from the interfering signals that impinges on the two side reflectors.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step b) of inhibiting further comprises providing an aperture of the receiving antenna having a shape that is a function of the regular angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein an aperture of the receiving antenna has at least three primary areas separated by effective gaps, each gap having a width that is a function of the regular angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:

c) matching an aperture of the receiving antenna to a function of the regular angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the step c) of selecting further comprises the sub-steps of:

(I) selecting the aperture to have a central area and two side areas; and

(ii) selecting an east-west dimension of the central area relative to an east-west dimension of the side area such that energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the central area cancels with energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the side areas.

9. The method according to claim 8, where in the step b) of canceling further comprises the sub-step of:

(iii) controlling a gain of the feedhorn such that the energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the central area cancels with the energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the side areas.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein:

the step a) of providing gain is performed within a main beam of an antenna pattern for the receiving antenna; and

the step b) of inhibiting interference is performed by two pairs of nulls within the main beam of the antenna pattern for the receiving antenna, the nulls being matched to at least two pairs of satellites in the constellation that are immediately adjacent to the central satellite.

11. A method for receiving a signal being transmitted from a constellation of satellites, which includes at least a central satellite, a first adjacent satellite spaced from the central satellite by a first angular interval relative to a terrestrial receiving antenna, a second adjacent satellite spaced from the central satellite by a second angular interval that is twice the first angular interval, and a third adjacent satellite spaced from the central satellite by a third angular interval that is three times the first angular interval, said method comprising the steps of:

a) enhancing a signal being transmitted from the central satellite to the terrestrial antenna; and

b) canceling interfering signals from the first, second and third adjacent satellites by creating nulls in the main lobe of the terrestrial antenna that match the first, second and third angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the step a) of enhancing is performed with a central reflector in the receiving antenna.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the step b) of canceling further comprises the sub-steps of:

(i) placing a gap between the central reflector and each of two side reflectors in the receiving antenna; and

(ii) selecting an east-west dimension of the central reflector relative to an east-west dimension of the side reflector such that energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the central reflector cancels with energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the side reflectors.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the step b) of canceling further comprises the sub-step of:

(iii) controlling a gain of the feedhorn such that the energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the central reflector cancels with the energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the side reflectors.

15. The method according to claim 11, wherein an aperture of the receiving antenna has at least three primary areas separated by effective gaps, each gap having a width that is a function of the regular angular intervals of the plurality of satellites.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the step b) of canceling further comprises the sub-steps of:

(i) placing a gap between the central area and each of two side areas in the aperture of the receiving antenna; and

(ii) selecting an east-west dimension of the central area relative to an east-west dimension of the side area such that energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the central area cancels with energy of the interfering signals impinging upon the side areas.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the step b) of canceling further comprises the sub-step of:

(iii) controlling a gain of the feedhorn such that the energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the central area cancels with the energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the side areas.

18. The method according to claim 11, wherein:

the step a) of providing gain is performed within a main beam of an antenna pattern of the receiving antenna; and

the step b) of inhibiting interference is performed by two pairs of nulls within the main beam of the antenna pattern of the receiving antenna, the nulls being matched to at least two pairs of satellites in the constellation that are immediately adjacent to the central satellite.

19. A method for receiving a signal being transmitted simultaneously from a constellation of satellites, which includes at least a central satellite, a first adjacent satellite spaced from the central satellite by a first angular interval relative to a terrestrial receiving antenna, a second adjacent satellite spaced from the central satellite by a second angular interval that is twice the first angular interval, and a third adjacent satellite spaced from the central satellite by a third angular interval that is three times the first angular interval, said method comprising the steps of:

a) enhancing a signal being transmitted from the central satellite with a central reflector in the receiving antenna;

b) canceling a first interfering signal from the first adjacent satellite by creating a null in the main lobe of the antenna that matches the first angular interval of the first adjacent satellite by;

(i) placing a gap between the central reflector and each of two side reflectors in the receiving antenna; and

(ii) selecting an east-west dimension of the central reflector relative to an east-west dimension of the side reflector such that energy of the first interfering signal impinging upon the central reflector cancels energy of the first interfering signal impinging upon the side reflectors;

c) canceling a second interfering signal from the second adjacent satellite by creating a null in the main lobe of the antenna that matches the second angular interval of the second adjacent satellite by;

(i) selecting an area of the central reflector relative to an area of the side reflector such that energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the central reflector cancels with energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the side reflectors without changing the cancellation of the first interfering signal in step b); and

d) canceling a third interfering signal from the third adjacent satellite by creating a null in the main lobe of the antenna that matches the third angular interval of the third adjacent satellite by selecting a north-south dimension of the side reflector such that the energy of the third interfering signal impinging upon the central reflector cancels with energy of the third interfering signal impinging upon the side reflectors without changing the cancellation of the second or first interfering signals in steps b) or c).

20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the step c) of canceling further comprises the step of:

(ii) controlling a gain of the feedhorn such that the energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the central reflector cancels with the energy of the second interfering signal impinging upon the side reflectors.