Ros beam failure detector

• US 6,081,348 A
• Filed: 03/05/1998
• Issued: 06/27/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 03/05/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Original Assignee: Xerox Corporation (Xerox Holdings Corp.)
• Inventors: Budnik, Roger W., Shoemaker, Ralph A., Raj, Guru B., Pacer, James M., Swales, Michael G.
• Primary Examiner(s): Grant, II, Jerome
• Application Number:
  US09/035,124
• Time in Patent Office: 845 Days
• Field of Search: 358/404, 358/406, 358/456, 358/480, 358/510, 358/534, 358/475, 358/448, 382/112, 382/141
• US Class Current: 358/406
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/5079 for maintenance
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 15/55 Self-diagnostics; Malfunction or lifetime display
• CPC Class Codes: G03G 2215/00046 Magnetical detection
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 1/00002 Diagnosis, testing or measuring; Detecting, analysing or monitoring not otherwise provided for error detection, error correction or monitoring in digital computers or digital computer components G06F11/00
• CPC Class Codes: H04N 1/4078 using gradational references, e.g. grey-scale test pattern analysis

Abstract

A method to provide a highly intelligent, automated diagnostic system that identifies the need to replace specific parts to minimize machine downtime rather than require extensive service troubleshooting. In particular, a systematic, logical test analysis scheme to assess machine operation from a simple sensor system and to be able to pinpoint parts and components needing replacement is provided by a series of first level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a first level of data and by a series of second level of tests by the control to monitor components for receiving a second level of data. Each of the first level tests and first level data is capable of identifying a first level of part failure independent of any other test. Each of the second level tests and second level data is a combination of first level tests and first level data or a combination of a first level test and first level data and a third level test and third level data. The second level tests and second level data are capable of identifying second and third levels of part failure. Codes are stored and displayed to manifest specific part failures.

Claims

1. In an image processing machine including a control, a dual beam laser scanner, and a sensor system to monitor developed process control test patches, a method to determine laser beam failure comprising the steps of:

monitoring the reflectance of a bare photoreceptor test patch and recording a value,

developing a first special test patch with a first laser beam on and a second laser beam off, the first special test patch providing an approximately 50% halftone developed signal if the first laser beam is operative,

developing a second special test patch with the second laser beam on and the first laser beam off, the second special test patch providing an approximately 50% halftone developed signal if the second laser beam is operative,

comparing the halftone developed signals from both the first and second special test patches to the reference signal, and

determining the operability of the first and second laser beams.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the sensor system includes a toner area coverage sensor.

3. In an image processing machine including a control, a multiple beam raster output scanner, and a sensor system to monitor developed process control test patches, a method to determine raster output scanner beam failure comprising the steps of:

developing a first special test patch with a first scanner beam on and any other scanner beams off, the first special test patch providing a first developed patch signal,

comparing the first developed signal to an expected developed patch signal if the first scanner beam is operative,

determining the operability of the first scanner beam,

developing a second special test patch with a second scanner beam on and any other scanner beams off, the second special test patch providing a second developed patch signal,

comparing the second developed patch signal to an expected developed patch signal if the second scanner beam is operative,

determining the operability of the second scanner beam,

repeating the steps of developing, comparing, and determining for any additional scanner beams, and

determining the overall operability of the raster output scanner.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the first and second special test patches are specific patterns to provide a given halftone reflectance.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the given halftone reflectance is approximately 50%.

6. The method of claim 3 wherein the raster output scanner is a dual laser beam.

7. In an image processing machine including a control, a multiple beam laser scanner, and a sensor system to monitor developed process control test patches, a method to determine laser beam failure comprising the steps of:

monitoring the reflectance of a bare photoreceptor test patch and recording a value,

developing a first special test patch with a first laser beam on, any other laser beam remaining off, the first special test patch providing a given halftone patch developed signal if the first laser beam is operative,

repeating the steps of developing a special test patch with each laser beam on with any other laser beam remaining off,

comparing the halftone developed signals to a reference signal, and

determining the operability of each of the laser beams.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the sensor system includes a toner area coverage sensor.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein the multiple beam laser is a dual beam laser.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein the special test patch provides an approximately 50% halftone developed signal.

11. In an image processing machine including a control, a multiple beam raster output scanner, and a sensor system to monitor developed process control test patches, a method to determine raster output scanner beam failure comprising the steps of:

developing a first special test patch, the first special test patch providing a first developed patch signal,

comparing the first developed signal to an expected developed patch signal to determine the operability of the first scanner beam,

developing a second special test patch, the second special test patch providing a second developed patch signal,

comparing the second developed patch signal to an expected developed patch signal to determine the operability of the second scanner beam,

repeating the steps of developing and comparing to determine the operability of the raster output scanner.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the special test patches are specific patterns to provide a given halftone reflectance.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the given halftone reflectance is approximately 50%.

14. The method of claim 11 wherein the raster output scanner is a dual laser beam.

15. In an image processing machine including a control, a dual beam laser scanner, and a sensor system to monitor developed process control test patches, a method to determine laser beam failure comprising the steps of:

developing a first special test patch, the first special test patch providing a given halftone developed signal,

developing a second special test patch, the second special test patch providing a given halftone developed signal,

comparing the halftone developed signals from both the first and second special test patches to a reference signal, and

determining the operability of the first and second laser beams.