Neuroimaging as a marketing tool

• US 6,099,319 A
• Filed: 11/09/1998
• Issued: 08/08/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 02/24/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Nielsen Company (US) LLC (RR Donnelley & Sons Company)
• Original Assignee: Gerald Zaltman, Stephen M. Kosslyn
• Inventors: Zaltman, Gerald, Kosslyn, Stephen M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Harrison, Jessica J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): ADAMS, CHANDA L
• Application Number:
  US09/188,796
• Time in Patent Office: 638 Days
• Field of Search: 434/236, 434/238, 434/258, 434/362, 706/927, 706/45, 706/5, 706/16, 705/1, 705/2, 705/11, 707/500, 707/530, 600/301, 600/306
• US Class Current: 434/236
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/055 involving electronic [EMR] or nuclear [NMR] magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/16 Devices for psychotechnics using teaching or educational appliances G09B1/00 - G09B7/00; Testing reaction times ; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/245 specially adapted for magnetoencephalographic [MEG] signals
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/02 Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising

Abstract

Neuroimaging as a means for validating whether a stimulus such as advertisement, communication, or product evokes a certain mental response such as emotion, preference, or memory, or to predict the consequences of the stimulus on later behavior such as consumption or purchasing. Subjects are exposed to stimuli of varying types. Their brain responses are then measured by any one or a combination of neuroimaging devices. The results of neuroimaging are then used to predict future behavior of the subject and those similarly situated with respect to purchase or consumption of products, based upon the non-subjective evidence of neuroimaging.

Claims

1. A method of evaluating stimulus materials comprising:

selecting subjects;

exposing the subject to stimulus materials;

monitoring the subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the subjects to the stimulus materials;

collecting data from the neuroimaging device; and

analyzing the data.

2. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the neuroimaging device is selected from the group of neuroimaging devices consisting of positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and single photon emission computer tomography.

3. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of stimuli consisting of visual, auditory, and a combination of visual and auditory.

4. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising:

selecting subjects based on predefined parameters.

5. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 4, where the predefined parameters are selected from the group of parameters consisting of age, income level, gender, education, and a combination thereof.

6. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of materials consisting of copy from an advertisement, description of a hypothetical environment, description of an actual environment, description of a hypothetical situation, description of an actual situation, description of a hypothetical behavior, and description of an actual behavior.

7. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising:

testing the subjects memory of the stimulus materials at a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

8. The method of evaluating stimulus materials of claim 1, further comprising:

monitoring the subject'"'"'s behavior for a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

9. A method of validating a questionnaire comprising:

selecting subjects;

exposing the subjects to stimulus materials;

monitoring the subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the subjects to the stimulus materials;

collecting data from the neuroimaging device;

analyzing the data;

providing the subject with a questionnaire which is completed by the subject;

correlating the questionnaire responses with the analyzed data from the neuroimaging device.

10. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the neuroimaging device is selected from the group of neuroimaging devices consisting of positron emission tomography, functional magnetic resonance imaging, magnetoencephalography and single photon emission computer tomography.

11. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of stimuli consisting of visual, auditory, and a combination of visual and auditory.

12. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising:

selecting subjects based on predefined parameters.

13. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 12, where the predefined parameters are selected from the group of parameters consisting of age, income level, gender, education, and a combination thereof.

14. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, where the stimulus materials are selected from the group of materials consisting of copy from an advertisement, description of a hypothetical environment, description of an actual environment, description of a hypothetical situation, description of an actual situation, description of a hypothetical behavior, and description of an actual behavior.

15. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising:

testing the subjects memory of the stimulus materials at a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

16. The method of validating a questionnaire of claim 9, further comprising:

monitoring the subject'"'"'s behavior for a predetermined time period after exposing the subject to the stimulus materials.

17. A method of predicting behavior comprising:

selecting a first set of subjects;

exposing the first set of subjects to stimulus materials;

monitoring the first set of subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the first set of subjects to stimulus materials;

collecting data from the neuroimaging device;

determining the measures of activation in a set of brain regions of interest from the collected data;

obtaining a behavioral measurement from the first set of subjects; and

correlating the behavioral measurement with the measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.

18. The method of predicting behavior of claim 17 further comprising:

providing the first set of subjects with a questionnaire which is completed by the first set of subjects to yield questionnaire results; and

correlating the questionnaire results with the behavioral measurement and the measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.

19. The method of predicting behavior of claim 18 further comprising:

selecting a second set of subjects;

monitoring the second set of subjects in a neuroimaging device while exposing the second set of subjects to a second type of stimulus materials;

collecting data from the neuroimaging device;

determining the measures of activation in a set of brain regions of interest from the collected data; and

determining whether the stimulus materials or the second type of stimulus materials produces the greatest measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.

20. The method of predicting behavior of claim 19 further comprising:

analyzing characteristics of the stimulus materials and the second type of stimulus materials;

correlating the characteristics with the collected data.

21. The method of predicting behavior of claim 20 further comprising:

determining which of the characteristics produces the greatest measures of activation in the set of brain regions of interest.