Safety method and device for full-voltage power supply to a user apparatus only when required, and control assembly comprising such a safety device

• US 6,100,607 A
• Filed: 05/22/1998
• Issued: 08/08/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 06/26/1997
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Dewert Antriebs-Und Systemtechnik GmbH& Company KG (Phoenix Mecano AG)
• Original Assignee: CompactGTL PLC
• Inventors: Olivieri, Daniele, Delgrossi, Paolo, Brambilla, Massimo
• Primary Examiner(s): Gaffin, Jeffrey
• Assistant Examiner(s): RIOS CUEVAS, ROBERTO JOSE
• Application Number:
  US09/102,440
• Time in Patent Office: 809 Days
• Field of Search: 395/750.01, 395/750.03, 395/750.06, 364/187, 307/64, 307/66, 307/86, 307/326, 307/115, 307/116, 307/127, 307/129, 307/139, 361/171, 361/185, 361/186, 361/188
• US Class Current: 307/125
• CPC Class Codes: H02H 3/12 responsive to underload or no-load for motors H02H7/0827

Abstract

A method of detecting a condition requiring connection of a user apparatus with a feeder line comprises the steps of low-voltage power supplying the user apparatus through a detection impedance (17, 17a); detecting the waveform at the ends of the detection impedance; operating connection of the user apparatus with the feeder line when the waveform at the ends of the detection impedance is distorted in a manner that has been pre-established to be caused by actuation of a command in the user apparatus and requiring full powering of same. A device in accordance with the method comprises an analysis circuit (19, 37) detecting (by comparison with sample waveforms stored in a memory (20), for example) distortion of the waveform at the ends of the impedance (17, 17a) and consequently operating powering of the user apparatus.

Claims

1. A method of detecting a condition requiring connection of a user apparatus to a feeder line voltage in response to a signal from the user apparatus, comprising the steps of:

connecting the user apparatus to a voltage source through a detection impedance wherein the voltage of said voltage source is lower than the voltage of said feeder line;

detecting the waveform produced by said source at the end of the detection impedance;

comparing the detected waveform with a predetermined waveform, and

connecting the user apparatus to the higher voltage feeder line when the detected waveform at the ends of the detection impedance is distorted in comparison to said predetermined waveform.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which distortion is detected by comparing the waveform on the detection impedance with at least one waveform that has been stored as being waveform due to detection impedance variation of the user apparatus caused by operation of a command in the user apparatus and requiring full powering of same.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which maintaining connection of the user apparatus to the feeder line voltage is made through a second detection impedance and which method comprises the further steps of:

comparing the voltage drop on the second impedance with a reference value which has been established to correspond to operation of the user apparatus, when the apparatus is powered by the feeder line voltage, and

operating disconnection of the user apparatus from the feeder line when a voltage drop value lower than said reference value is detected from such comparison.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which maintaining connection of the user apparatus with the feeder line voltage is carried out through a second detection impedance and which method comprises the further steps of:

detecting the waveform at the ends of the second detection impedance;

comparing the waveform with a sample waveform that has been stored as being a waveform die to the maximum impedance of the user apparatus caused by operation of a command in the user apparatus, when powered to the feeder line voltage, and requiring powering of same at the line voltage; and

operating disconnection of the user apparatus from the feeder line when a waveform indicative of a greater impedance than said maximum impedance is detected from such comparison.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which the user apparatus is powered at a low voltage by a step-down transformer connected to said feeder line.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1, in which waveform comparisons are carried out by means of a DSP (Digital Signal Processor).

7. A safety device for supplying power to a user apparatus with a full supply voltage feeder line when a condition, that has been established to require this power supply, is detected, comprising

a low-voltage source for powering the user apparatus, when in a rest condition, through a detection impedance;

an analysis circuit for comparing the waveform at the ends of the detection impedance with a predetermined waveform;

a further circuit for connecting the user apparatus to the feeder line when said further circuit receives a signal from the analysis circuit indicating that a distortion between the compared waveforms is present.

8. A safety device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that said predetermined waveform comprises one or more sample waveforms that are stored in memory means and are pre-established to be waveforms resulting from the impedance variation of the user apparatus caused by operation of a command in the user apparatus and requiring full power supply of same.

9. A safety device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that connection of the user apparatus by said further circuit to the feeder line is made through a second impedance and said further circuit comprises a comparator comparing the voltage drop on the second impedance with a reference value which has been established to correspond to the voltage drop due to the maximum impedance of the user apparatus caused by operation of a command in the user apparatus, when powered at the feeder line voltage, and requiring powering of same at the line voltage;

said further circuit receiving a disconnection signal of the user apparatus from the feeder line when the comparator detects a voltage drop value lower than said reference value.

10. A safety device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that connection of the user apparatus to the feeder line is made through a second impedance and in that it further comprises:

a second analysis circuit detecting the waveform at the ends of the second impedance and comparing this waveform with one or more sample waveforms that are stored in memory means and have been pre-established to be waveforms due to the maximum impedance of the user apparatus caused by operation of a command in the user apparatus, when powered at the feeder line voltage, and requiring power supply of same at the line voltage;

the connecting circuit receiving a disconnection signal to disconnect the user apparatus from the feeder line when the second analysis circuit detects a waveform indicative of a greater impedance than said maximum impedance.

11. A safety device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the low-voltage source is accomplished by means of a step-down transformer connected to said feeder line.

12. A safety device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the connecting circuit comprises a relay with switching-over contacts between said feeder line and the low-voltage source.

13. A safety device as claimed in claim 7, characterized in that the analysis circuit comprises a DSP (Digital Signal Processor).

14. A safety device as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that connection between the second impedance and second analysis circuit is accomplished through an optical coupler.

15. A safety device as claimed in claim 10, characterized in that the connecting circuit comprises a relay with switching-over contacts between said feeder line and the low-voltage source, the first impedance being upstream of the switching-over contacts of the relay, and the second impedance being downstream thereof.

16. A control assembly in combination with the safety device as claimed in claim 7, and a user apparatus in turn comprising at least one electromechanical actuator operated by manual commands therein, for effecting movement of the, user apparatus.

17. A control assembly as claimed in claim 16, characterized in that the electromechanical actuator is controlled by the manual commands through corresponding relays.

18. A control assembly as claimed in claim 16, characterized in that the user apparatus comprises a step-down transformer for power supplying its inner circuits.

19. A control assembly as claimed in claim 18, characterized in that, on operation, the commands connect the corresponding relay in parallel with the transformer power supply winding.