Method for personal computer-based home surveillance

• US 6,107,918 A
• Filed: 11/25/1997
• Issued: 08/22/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 11/25/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Mei California, Inc. (Micron Technology, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Micro Electronics Incorporated
• Inventors: Klein, Dean, Stevenson, Greg
• Primary Examiner(s): POPE, DARYL C
• Application Number:
  US08/977,560
• Time in Patent Office: 1,001 Days
• Field of Search: 340/506, 340/511, 340/517, 340/521, 340/526, 340/531, 340/532, 340/541, 340/825.06, 340/825.31, 340/825.32, 340/825.36, 340/825.49
• US Class Current: 340/511
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 25/14 Central alarm receiver or annunciator arrangements

Abstract

A PC-based home security system for monitoring the environment surrounding a PC in order to detect suspicious or uncharacteristic events. The PC-based home security system first monitors the environment, listening and watching for a threshold event. When a threshold event is detected, the PC-based home security system then conducts close surveillance of the environment in order to detect and characterize additional events. When the accumulated detected events exceed some threshold value, the PC-based home security system determines that a suspicious or uncharacteristic set of events has occurred, diagnoses those events, and takes a remedial action appropriate to the diagnosed set of suspicious circumstances.

Claims

1. In a personal computer-based home security system implemented as a software program that runs on commercially available personal computers that include a modem, a microphone, and a video camera, a method for monitoring an environment to detect and remedy unusual circumstances that occur in the environment, the method comprising:

sampling data collected by the microphone and video camera to detect threshold events that represent a change in the environment;

detecting threshold events that represent a change in the environment;

conducting a close surveillance following the detection of a threshold event by more frequently sampling data collected by the microphone and video camera in order to detect, characterize, and record events that represent differences between the sampled data and data normally collected from the environment;

using data patterns that define and categorize types of events;

during close surveillance, monitoring and recording audio data input from the microphone and video data input from the video camera, detecting differences in the input data from expected background, comparing the detected differences with input patterns to determine the type of event that produced the differences, and computing a metric that describes a suspicion level corresponding to the detected events; and

when the close surveillance component has detected sufficient events, initiating an appropriate remedial action.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein monitoring threshold events further comprises comparing audio data input from the microphone and video data input from the video camera to expected background audio and video data for the environment and detecting as a threshold event a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data greater than a threshold value.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein an increase in the amplitude of input audio data above the amplitude of the expected background audio data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

4. The method of claim 2 wherein detection of movement within in the input video data is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein an increase in the brightness of input video data above the brightness of the expected background video data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

6. The method of claim 2 wherein a decrease in the brightness of input video data above the brightness of the expected background video data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

7. The method of claim 2 wherein a decrease in the contrast of input video data above the contrast of the expected background video data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

8. The method of claim 2 wherein the input audio data and input video data are correlated with the time of day of input and compared to audio data and video data expected for that time of day.

9. The method of claim 2 wherein the input audio data and input video data are correlated with the time of day and the day of the week of input and compared to audio data and video data expected for that time of day and day of the week.

10. The method of claim 2 wherein the personal computer-based home security system is first trained by exposing it to the environment so that the personal computer-based home security system can detect and store a representation of the expected background input for the environment.

11. The method of claim 1 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the number of different events detected by the close surveillance component.

12. The method of claim 1 including the use of an event collection that contains information for each type of event that indicates how to compute a severity metric for that event, the information used to compute a severity metric in the indicated manner for each detected event.

13. The method of claim 1 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the of the severity metrics computed for the different events detected during close surveillance.

14. The method of claim 1 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the of the severity metrics computed for the different events detected during close surveillance along with a sum of correlations between pairs of events.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein during close surveillance, indications of detected events are stored into detected event collections.

16. The method of claim 1, further including the use of a diagnosis collection that contains indications of different types of diagnoses correlated with different event and event sequences.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein event sequences are lists of events ordered by time of occurrence.

18. The method of claim 16, further including the use of a remedy collection that contains indications of remedial actions that should be initiated following determination of a particular diagnosis of events that have occurred in the environment and that have been detected during close surveillance.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein initiating appropriate remedial action further includes comparing the events that have been detected during close surveillance to the different event and event sequences stored in the diagnosis collection in order to match the detected events with a most likely diagnosis, selecting actions from the remedy collection consistent with the most likely diagnosis, and initiating the selected actions.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein a remedial action directs the personal computer-based home security system to call a specific telephone number via the modem and send a specific message through the modem to a receiving party, the remedy collection storing an indication of the type of receiving party to expect for each telephone number, including a human, a fax machine, and another modem.

21. In a personal computer-based home security system implemented as a software program that runs on commercially available personal computers that include a modem and a microphone, a method for monitoring an environment to detect and remedy unusual circumstances that occur in the environment, the method comprising:

sampling data collected by the microphone to detect threshold events that represent a change in the environment;

detecting threshold events that represent a change in the environment;

conducting a close surveillance following the detection of a threshold event by more frequently sampling data collected by the microphone in order to detect, characterize, and record events that represent differences between the sampled data and data normally collected from the environment;

using data patterns that define and categorize types of events;

during close surveillance, monitoring and recording audio data input from the microphone, detecting differences in the input data from expected background, comparing the detected differences with input patterns to determine the type of event that produced the differences, and computing a metric that describes a suspicion level corresponding to the detected events, the computed metric being a sum of the number of different events detected by the close surveillance component; and

when the close surveillance component has detected sufficient events, initiating an appropriate remedial action.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein the monitoring threshold events comprises comparing audio data input from the microphone to expected background audio data for the environment and detecting as a threshold event a discrepancy between the input audio data and expected background audio data greater than a threshold value.

23. The method of claim 21 wherein an increase in the amplitude of input audio data above the amplitude of the expected background audio data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

24. The method of claim 21 wherein the input audio data is correlated with the time of day of input and compared to audio data expected for that time of day.

25. The method of claim 21 wherein the input audio data is correlated with the time of day and the day of the week of input and compared to audio data expected for that time of day and day of the week.

26. The method of claim 21 wherein the personal computer-based home security system is first trained by exposing it to the environment so that the personal computer-based home security system can detect and store a representation of the expected background input for the environment.

27. The method of claim 21 including the use of an event collection that contains information for each type of event that indicates how to compute a severity metric for that event, the information used to compute a severity metric in the indicated manner for each detected event.

28. The method of claim 21 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the of the severity metrics computed for the different events detected by the close surveillance component.

29. The method of claim 21 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the of the severity metrics computed for the different events detected during close surveillance along with a sum of correlations between pairs of events.

30. The method of claim 21 wherein the close surveillance component stores indications of detected events into a detected event collection.

31. The method of claim 21, further including the use of a diagnosis collection that contains indications of different types of diagnoses correlated with different event and event sequences.

32. The method of claim 31 wherein event sequences are lists of events ordered by time of occurrence.

33. The method of claim 31, further including the use of a remedy collection that contains indications of remedial actions that should be initiated following determination of a particular diagnosis of events that have occurred in the environment and that have been detected during close surveillance.

34. The method of claim 33 wherein initiating appropriate remedial action further includes comparing the events that have been detected during close surveillance to the different event and event sequences stored in the diagnosis collection in order to match the detected events with a most likely diagnosis, selecting actions from the remedy collection consistent with the most likely diagnosis, and initiating the selected actions.

35. The method of claim 21 wherein a remedial action directs the personal computer-based home security system to call a specific telephone number via the modem and send a specific message through the modem to a receiving party, the remedy collection storing an indication of the type of receiving party to expect for each telephone number, including a human, a fax machine, and another modem.

36. In a personal computer-based home security system implemented as a software program that runs on commercially available personal computers that include a modem and a video camera, a method for monitoring an environment to detect and remedy unusual circumstances that occur in the environment, the method comprising:

sampling data collected by the video camera to detect threshold events that represent a change in the environment;

detecting threshold events that represent a change in the environment;

conducting a close surveillance following the detection of a threshold event by more frequently sampling data collected by the video camera in order to detect, characterize, and record events that represent differences between the sampled data and data normally collected from the environment;

using data patterns that define and categorize types of events;

during close surveillance, monitoring and recording video data input from the video camera, detecting differences in the input data from expected background, comparing the detected differences with input patterns to determine the type of event that produced the differences, and computing a metric that describes a suspicion level corresponding to the detected events; and

when the close surveillance component has detected sufficient events, initiating an appropriate remedial action.

37. The method of claim 36 wherein monitoring threshold events further comprises comparing video data input from the video camera to expected background video data for the environment and detecting as a threshold event a discrepancy between the input video data and expected background video data greater than a threshold value.

38. The method of claim 36 wherein detection of movement within in the input video data is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

39. The method of claim 37 wherein an increase in the brightness of input video data above the brightness of the expected background video data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

40. The method of claim 37 wherein a decrease in the brightness of input video data above the brightness of the expected background video data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

41. The method of claim 37 wherein a decrease in the contrast of input video data above the contrast of the expected background video data over a short time interval is a discrepancy between the input data and expected background data.

42. The method of claim 37 wherein the input video data is correlated with the time of day of input and compared to video data expected for that time of day.

43. The method of claim 37 wherein the input video data is correlated with the time of day and the day of the week of input and compared to video data expected for that time of day and day of the week.

44. The method of claim 36 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the number of different events detected by the close surveillance component.

45. The method of claim 36 including the use of an event collection that contains information for each type of event that indicates how to compute a severity metric for that event, the information used to compute a severity metric in the indicated manner for each detected event.

46. The method of claim 36 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the of the severity metrics computed for the different events detected by the close surveillance component.

47. The method of claim 36 where the computed metric that describes a suspicion level is a sum of the of the severity metrics computed for the different events detected during close surveillance along with a sum of correlations between pairs of events.

48. The method of claim 36 wherein during close surveillance, indications of detected events are stored into detected event collections.

49. The method of claim 48, further including the use of a diagnosis collection that contains indications of different types of diagnoses correlated with different event and event sequences.

50. The method of claim 49 wherein event sequences are lists of events ordered by time of occurrence.

51. The method of claim 49, further including the use of a remedy collection that contains indications of remedial actions that should be initiated following determination of a particular diagnosis of events that have occurred in the environment and that have been detected during close surveillance.

52. The method of claim 51 wherein initiating appropriate remedial action further includes comparing the events that have been detected during close surveillance to the different event and event sequences stored in the diagnosis collection in order to match the detected events with a most likely diagnosis, selecting actions from the remedy collection consistent with the most likely diagnosis, and initiating the selected actions.

53. The method of claim 36 wherein a remedial action directs the personal computer-based home security system to call a specific telephone number via the modem and send a specific message through the modem to a receiving party, the remedy collection storing an indication of the type of receiving party to expect for each telephone number, including a human, a fax machine, and another modem.

54. The method of claim 37 wherein the personal computer-based home security system is first trained by exposing it to the environment so that the personal computer-based home security system can detect and store a representation of the expected background input for the environment.