Method for avoiding fraud on a taximeter or tachograph

• US 6,109,520 A
• Filed: 07/13/1998
• Issued: 08/29/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 07/16/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Claude Ricard
• Original Assignee: Claude Ricard
• Inventors: Ricard, Claude
• Primary Examiner(s): LEE, MICHAEL GUNYOUNG
• Application Number:
  US09/115,254
• Time in Patent Office: 778 Days
• Field of Search: 235/384, 235/30 A, 235/30 R, 235/45, 235/376, 235/377, 235/387
• US Class Current: 235/30.00R
• CPC Class Codes: G07B 13/02 Details; Accessories
• CPC Class Codes: G07C 7/00 Details or accessories common to the registering or indicating apparatus of groups G07C3/00 and G07C5/00

Abstract

A method and device for avoiding fraud on a Taximeter or Tachograph, by connecting an auxiliary generator between the censor and the Taximeter or Tachograph. The signal which is applied to the Taximeter or Tachograph is analyzed by sampling, in an anti-fraud action is triggered off if this analysis shows that this signal has undergone a regular amplitude modulation.

Claims

1. A method for avoiding fraud on a taximeter or tachograph associated with a vehicle, the taximeter or the tachograph including a sensor which supplies electrical data to said taximeter or tachograph, such as a train of pulses which is representative of the speed of the vehicle, the method comprising the step wherein an anti-fraud action is triggered if voltage applied to the taximeter or tachograph and representative of said speed of the vehicle is modulated in amplitude.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said anti-fraud action comprises preventing the taximeter or tachograph from functioning.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said voltage is sampled in order to determine whether said voltage is modulated in amplitude.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein square or rectangular waveform signals are issued from the sensor and applied to the taximeter or tachograph, and wherein the high levels and/or the low levels of the waveform signals are analyzed and the anti-fraud action is triggered if, over a given time, there are sufficient values of these levels which are outside a tolerance band around a corresponding mean value of one and/or the other of these levels.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein high and/or low peaks of the voltage applied to the taximeter or tachograph are measured for a certain number of high levels and/or low levels of said voltage, variations of these peak voltages are examined, and the anti-fraud action is triggered if, over a given time, there are a certain number of these variations of sufficient amplitude.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein a mean value of these high and/or low peak voltages is calculated, and the anti-fraud action is triggered if more than a certain number of values of peak voltages differ sufficiently from the mean value.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the periodicity of the modulation is examined in order to trigger the anti-fraud action.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of effecting sampling, analysis of the voltage, and control of the anti-fraud action by a central processing unit of the taximeter or tachograph.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein variation of the voltage is analyzed by a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT).

10. A method for triggering an anti-fraud action on a taximeter or tachograph of a vehicle, wherein a sensor provides a first signal representing speed of the vehicle and the taximeter or tachograph receives a second signal, the method comprising the steps of:

a) determining whether the second signal is a modulated version of the first signal; and

b) triggering an anti-fraud action if the second signal is determined to be modulated.

11. A method according to claim 10 wherein the first signal is a substantially rectangular waveform having corresponding high and low levels, and step (a) includes:

sampling the second signal;

calculating at least one of a mean high value and a mean low value corresponding to the second signal; and

determining a number of samples of the second signal which are outside a tolerance band around the at least one of the mean high value and the mean low value during a predetermined time; and

step (b) includes triggering the anti-fraud action if the determined number of samples outside exceeds a predetermined value.