Method and apparatus of predicting a fault condition

• US 6,119,074 A
• Filed: 05/20/1998
• Issued: 09/12/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 05/20/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Original Assignee: Caterpillar Incorporated
• Inventors: Sarangapani, Jagannathan
• Primary Examiner(s): SHAH, KAMINI S
• Application Number:
  US09/082,391
• Time in Patent Office: 846 Days
• Field of Search: 702/185, 702/187, 702/179, 702/182, 702/181, 701/26, 701/1, 701/35, 700/29, 340/870.01, 340/901, 340/500, 340/514, 340/517
• US Class Current: 702/185
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 23/0232 based on qualitative trend analysis, e.g. system evolution

Abstract

An apparatus for predicting a fault condition for a machine is disclosed. The machine has a plurality of parameters being dependent upon machine performance. A sensor connected to the machine produces an electrical signal in response to one of the plurality of machine parameters. A computer produces a data trend of the parameter in response to the electrical signal, calculates the duration and slope of the trend, and predicts the time period in which the trend will exceed the warning level.

Claims

1. An apparatus for predicting a fault condition, comprising:

a machine having a plurality of parameters being dependent upon machine performance;

a sensor connected to the machine and adapted to produce an electrical signal in response to one of the plurality of machine parameters;

means for producing a data trend of the parameter in response to the electrical signal;

means for calculating a confidence value of the machine parameter, the confidence value representing the degree of certainty that a failure has been detected;

means for assigning a weight to the machine parameter, the weight representing the degree of certainty that the machine parameter is the root cause of the failure;

means for multiplying the confidence value by the associated weight of the parameter value; and

means for comparing the overall confidence value to a plurality of limit values where each limit value is associated with a particular parameter, and determining the cause of the failure in response to the overall confidence value corresponding to a particular set of limit values.

2. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 1, including a channel that includes one or more machine parameters.

3. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of determining an overall confidence value includes the step of multiplying the confidence value of each sensed parameter by the associated parameter weighting value, then combining the associated product of each sensed parameter, the overall confidence value representing the degree of certainty that a failure has been detected by the particular channel.

4. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 1, including a plurality of channels each including one or more machine parameters.

5. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of comparing the actual value of the sensed parameter to the associated general trend of the parameter and determining a delta value of the sensed parameter in response to the difference between the actual value and the general trend.

6. An apparatus, as set forth in claim 1, including the step of determining whether the delta value is within an upper and lower set of limits, and determining the parameter confidence value in response to the delta value of the machine parameter exceeding either the upper or lower set of limits.