Electric battery monitoring systems

• US 6,133,739 A
• Filed: 01/20/2000
• Issued: 10/17/2000
• Est. Priority Date: 01/20/2000
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Amphenol Network Solutions, Inc. (Amphenol Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Hendry Mechanical Works (Amphenol Corporation)
• Inventors: Kvaas, Robert E., Garrow, Stanley H.
• Primary Examiner(s): Riley, Shawn
• Assistant Examiner(s): Tibbits, Pia
• Application Number:
  US09/488,433
• Time in Patent Office: 271 Days
• Field of Search: 324/426
• US Class Current: 324/426
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/367 Software therefor, e.g. for battery testing using modelling or look-up tables
• CPC Class Codes: G01R 31/3842 combining voltage and current measurements

Abstract

A method of monitoring electric battery capacity effects evaluation of battery capacity in terms of battery current and battery voltage in a succession of monitoring cycles, scales down an influence of battery current on the evaluation as the succession of monitoring cycles, progresses, and scales up an influence of battery voltage on such evaluation as the succession of monitoring cycles progresses. A similar method effects an assessment of battery capacity during alternating battery discharge operations and battery charging operations over a recurrence of monitoring cycles, detects a decline of attainable battery charge capacity during battery charging operations, and modifies its assessment in response to the detected decline of attainable battery charge capacity. A related method effects evaluation of battery capacity during battery discharges in a succession of monitoring cycles, effects an adjustment of such evaluation of battery capacity in a succession of further monitoring cycles during battery charge restoration between battery discharges, and effects a modification of the adjustment during a decline of battery charging efficiency in a vicinity of full charge restoration.

Claims

1. A method of monitoring electric battery capacity, comprising in combination:

effecting evaluation of battery capacity in terms of battery current and battery voltage in a succession of monitoring cycles;

scaling down an influence of said battery current on said evaluation as said succession of monitoring cycles progresses; and

scaling up an influence of said battery voltage on said evaluation as said succession of monitoring cycles progresses.

2. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said scaling down is in proportion to withdrawal of battery power since an initial monitoring cycle relative to an initial battery capacity.

3. A method as in claim 2, wherein:

said withdrawal of battery power is determined by integrating a series of increments of battery current over a time interval from said initial monitoring cycle.

4. A method as in claim 2, wherein:

said scaling up is proportional to a proximity of actual battery voltage to a terminal battery voltage.

5. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said scaling up is proportional to a proximity of actual battery voltage to a terminal battery voltage.

6. A method as in claim 5, wherein:

said proximity is determined by dividing a time interval from an initial monitoring cycle by a sum of said time interval and an actual value of battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

7. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said evaluation includes effecting an assessment of battery capacity at a start of substantially each monitoring cycle and reducing said assessment in proportion to battery power withdrawal during substantially each monitoring cycle.

8. A method as in claim 7, wherein:

said scaling down includes a scaling down of said reduced assessment in proportion to withdrawal of battery power since an initial monitoring cycle relative to an initial battery capacity.

9. A method as in claim 8, wherein:

said withdrawal of battery power is determined by integrating a series of increments of battery current over time intervals from said initial monitoring cycle.

10. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said evaluation includes generating a product of a battery current and a time derivative of battery voltage during substantially each monitoring cycle.

11. A method as in claim 10, wherein:

said time derivative includes actual battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

12. A method as in claim 11, wherein:

said slope is a time derivative of said actual battery voltage.

13. A method as in claim 10, wherein:

said scaling up includes a scaling up of said product in proportion to a proximity of actual battery voltage to a terminal battery voltage.

14. A method as in claim 13, wherein:

said proximity is determined by dividing a time interval from an initial monitoring cycle by a sum of said time interval and an actual value of battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

15. A method as in claim 1, wherein:

said evaluation includes effecting an assessment of battery capacity at a start of substantially each monitoring cycle and reducing said assessment in proportion to battery power withdrawal during substantially each monitoring cycle, and generating a product of a battery current and a time derivative of battery voltage during substantially each monitoring cycle.

16. A method as in claim 15, wherein:

said scaling down includes a scaling down of said reduced assessment in proportion to withdrawal of battery power since an initial monitoring cycle relative to an initial battery capacity.

17. A method as in claim 16, wherein:

said withdrawal of battery power is determined by integrating a series of battery current increments over a time interval from said initial monitoring cycle.

18. A method as in claim 15, wherein:

said time derivative includes actual battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

19. A method as in claim 18, wherein:

said slope is a time derivative of said actual battery voltage.

20. A method as in claim 15, wherein:

said scaling up includes a scaling up of said product in proportion to a proximity of actual battery voltage to a terminal battery voltage.

21. A method as in claim 20, wherein:

said proximity is determined by dividing a time interval from an initial monitoring cycle by a sum of said time interval and an actual value of battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

22. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein:

said evaluation of battery capacity is employed to initiate a battery charging operation.

23. A method as in claim 22, wherein:

said battery charging operation is continued toward restoration of a full battery charge.

24. A method as in claim 22, wherein:

a further evaluation of battery capacity is effected in further monitoring cycles during said battery charging operation.

25. A method as in claim 24, wherein:

said further evaluation of battery capacity includes effecting an assessment of battery capacity at the start of each further monitoring cycle and effecting an augmentation of such assessment in proportion to battery power addition during said battery charging operation.

26. A method as in claim 25, wherein:

a rate of said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered in a vicinity of full charge capacity.

27. A method as in claim 25, wherein:

said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered in a vicinity of full charge capacity at a rate corresponding to a decrease in charging efficiency as said charging operation approaches a full charge capacity.

28. A method as in claim 25, wherein:

a rate of said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered in a vicinity of a decrease in battery charging efficiency during said charging operation.

29. A method as in claim 25, wherein:

a rate of said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered when the battery charging operation has effected battery charging on the order of seventy percent of a full battery charge.

30. A method as in claim 24, wherein:

said further evaluation of battery capacity includes effecting an assessment of battery capacity at the start of each further monitoring cycle, effecting an augmentation of such assessment in proportion to battery power addition during said battery charging operation, and scaling down such augmentation in a vicinity of a decrease in battery charging efficiency pursuant to a ratio of a difference between (A) the assessed capacity during charge restoration and a point at which the charge efficiency begins to be reduced, and (B) an anticipated charge needed above said point for full battery charge restoration.

31. A method of monitoring electric battery capacity in a succession of monitoring cycles, comprising in combination:

effecting an assessment of battery capacity during alternating battery discharge operations and battery charging operations over a recurrence of said monitoring cycles;

detecting a decline of attainable battery charge capacity during said battery charging operations; and

modifying said assessment in response to said detected decline of attainable battery charge capacity.

32. A method of monitoring electric battery capacity in a succession of monitoring cycles, comprising in combination:

effecting an assessment of battery capacity at a start of substantially each monitoring cycle;

reducing said assessment in proportion to battery power withdrawal during substantially each monitoring cycle;

generating over said monitoring cycles a decreasing first scale factor proportional to withdrawal of battery power since an initial monitoring cycle relative to an initial battery capacity;

effecting a first modification of said reduced assessment by said first scale factor during substantially each monitoring cycle;

generating a product of a battery current and a time derivative of battery voltage during substantially each monitoring cycle;

generating over said monitoring cycles a varying second scale factor proportional to a proximity of battery voltage to a terminal battery voltage;

effecting a second modification of said time derivative by said second scale factor during substantially each monitoring cycle; and

calculating available battery capacity from said effected first and second modifications.

33. A method as in claim 32, wherein:

said withdrawal of battery power is determined by integrating a series of battery current increments over a time interval from said initial monitoring cycle.

34. A method as in claim 32, wherein:

said time derivative includes actual battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

35. A method as in claim 34, wherein:

said slope is a time derivative of said actual battery voltage.

36. A method as in claim 32, wherein:

said scaling up includes a scaling up of said product in proportion to a proximity of actual battery voltage to a terminal battery voltage.

37. A method as in claim 36, wherein:

said proximity is determined by dividing a time interval from an initial monitoring cycle by a sum of said time interval and an actual value of battery voltage above a terminal battery voltage divided by substantially twice a battery voltage slope during battery discharge.

38. A method of monitoring electric battery capacity, comprising in combination:

effecting evaluation of battery capacity during battery discharges in a succession of monitoring cycles;

effecting an adjustment of said evaluation of battery capacity in a succession of further monitoring cycles during battery charge restoration between battery discharges; and

effecting a modification of said adjustment during a decline of battery charging efficiency in a vicinity of full charge restoration.

39. A method as in claim 38, including:

effecting evaluation of battery capacity in terms of battery current and battery voltage in a succession of monitoring cycles during battery discharges;

scaling down an influence of said battery current on said evaluation as said succession of monitoring cycles progresses; and

scaling up an influence of said battery voltage on said evaluation as said succession of monitoring cycles progresses.

40. A method as in claim 38, wherein:

said evaluation of battery capacity is employed to initiate battery charge restoration during battery discharges.

41. A method as in claim 38, wherein:

said modification of said adjustment is employed to improve evaluation of battery capacity in case of battery discharges after partial battery charge restoration.

42. A method as in claim 38, wherein:

said battery charge restoration is continued toward restoration of a full battery charge.

43. A method as in claim 38, wherein:

said adjustment includes effecting an assessment of battery capacity at the start of each further monitoring cycle and effecting an augmentation of said assessment in proportion to battery current addition during said battery charge restoration.

44. A method as in claim 43, wherein:

said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered in a vicinity of full charge restoration.

45. A method as in claim 43, wherein:

a rate of said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered in a vicinity of a decrease in battery charging efficiency during said battery charge restoration.

46. A method as in claim 45, wherein:

said rate corresponds to a decrease in charging efficiency as said battery charge restoration approaches a full charge restoration.

47. A method as in claim 45, wherein:

said augmentation is scaled down in said vicinity pursuant to a ratio of a difference between (A) the assessed capacity during charge restoration and a point at which the charge efficiency begins to be reduced, and (B) an anticipated charge needed above said point for full battery charge restoration.

48. A method as in claim 45, wherein:

said augmentation is scaled down in said vicinity by a scale factor substantially equal to

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">1-A/B

wherein A is an assessed capacity during charge restoration and a point at which the charge efficiency begins to be reduced, and

B is an anticipated charge needed in said vicinity for full battery charge restoration.

49. A method as in claim 45, wherein:

said augmentation is scaled down in said vicinity by a scale factor substantially equal to

space="preserve" listing-type="equation">1-A.7/B.3

wherein A.7 is a difference between assessed battery capacity during charge restoration and seventy percent of anticipated full charge restoration, and

B.3 is equal to thirty percent of anticipated full charge restoration.

50. A method as in claim 45, wherein:

a rate of said augmentation of said assessment of battery capacity is lowered when battery charge restoration has reached substantially seventy percent of anticipated full charge restoration.

51. A method as in claim 38, including:

effecting an evaluation of battery capacity during alternating battery discharges and battery charge restorations over recurring monitoring cycles;

detecting a decline of attainable battery charge restoration during said recurring monitoring cycles; and

modifying said evaluation of battery capacity in response to said detected decline of attainable battery charge capacity.