Method for coverage optimization of multi-frequency assignment system

• US 6,188,906 B1
• Filed: 12/30/1998
• Issued: 02/13/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 12/30/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Inventors: Lim, Young-sik, Wee, Pyeong-hwan
• Primary Examiner(s): Eisenzopf, Reinhard J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): APPIAH, CHARLES NANA
• Application Number:
  US09/224,233
• Time in Patent Office: 776 Days
• Field of Search: 455/522, 455/63, 455/69, 455/452, 455/453, 455/450, 455/447, 455/437, 455/442, 455/436, 370/330, 370/331, 370/335, 370/320, 370/329
• US Class Current: 455/453
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/06 Hybrid resource partitioning, e.g. channel borrowing
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 36/08 Reselecting an access point
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 48/08 Access restriction or access information delivery, e.g. discovery data delivery signalling during connection H04W76/00
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/0453 Resources in frequency domain, e.g. a carrier in FDMA
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 72/541 using the level of interference

Abstract

A method for coverage optimization of a multi-frequency assignment communication system employing a dummy pilot channel, particularly a CDMA communication system. A first base station is configured to transmit communication signals to subscriber terminals using at least a first frequency allocation (FA#1) and a second frequency allocation (FA#2). A second base station transmits communication signals to subscriber terminals using FA#1 substantially more frequently than FA#2. The second base station has a dummy pilot at FA#2 which is used for handoff at FA#2. The method equalizes coverage in the first base station at FA#1 and FA#2 by transmitting the dummy pilot with less RF power than that for a pilot channel at FA#1 of the second base station, and sufficient to substantially equalize a handoff boundary between first and second cells at both FA#1 and FA#2 in an environment of more communication traffic and associated interference at FA#1 than at FA#2.

Claims

1. In a multi-frequency assignment communication system having at least first and second base stations allocated for respective geographic cells, with said first base station configured to transmit communication signals to subscriber terminals using at least a first frequency allocation (FA#1) and a second frequency allocation (FA#2), said second base station configured to transmit communication signals to subscriber terminals using FA#1 substantially more frequently than FA#2, said second base station having a dummy pilot at FA#2 which is used for handoff at FA#2, a method for equalizing coverage in said first base station at FA#1 and FA#2 comprising:

transmitting said dummy pilot with less radio frequency (RF) power than for a pilot channel at FA#1 of said second base station, and sufficient to substantially equalize a handoff boundary between said first and second cells at both FA#1 and FA#2 in an environment of more communication traffic and associated interference at FA#1 than for FA#2.

2. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein said communication system is a code division multiple access (CDMA) system.

3. The method as set forth in claim 1 wherein pilot channel signals of said first base station at FA#1 and FA#2 are transmitted with substantially equal RF power.

4. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said RF power of said dummy pilot is determined in accordance with a dummy pilot power allocation ratio based on a computation of path loss L(r_(FA1,1)) of a service area of said second base station at FA#1 as follows:

$L<br><br>\left(r_{\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}\right)=\frac{\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>N_0<br><br>W}{P_t<br><br>G_c<br><br>G_m<br><br>\left[{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}-\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>\left(\frac{1}{F_1}-{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}\right)\right]}$

where,

F₁ is frequency reuse efficiency at a distance r from said second base station for FA#1,

P_t is base station transmit power,

G_c is base station antenna gain including feeder line cable loss,

G_m is mobile station antenna gain including feeder line cable loss,

E_c is energy per chip code,

I_t is total interference as a summation of cell interference, other cell interference and background noise,

N₀ is thermal noise density,

W is channel bandwidth,

ξ

_{pilot,(FA1,1)} is a ratio of power allocated to a pilot channel for FA#1 in said second base station, and

E_C/I_t is the strength of a pilot channel signal being received from a mobile station.

5. The method as set forth in claim 4, wherein path loss of a service area of said second base station forward link for FA#2 is determined as follows:

$L<br><br>\left(r_{\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}\right)=\frac{\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>N_0<br><br>W}{P_t<br><br>G_c<br><br>G_m<br><br>\left[{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}-\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>\left({\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}+<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{paging}}+{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{sync}}\right)<br><br>\left(\frac{1}{F_2}\right)+\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}\right]}$

where

F₂ is frequency reuse efficiency at said distance r from said second base station for FA#2,

ξ

_{pilot,(FA2,1)} is a ratio of power allocated to the pilot channel for FA#2 in said second base station,

ξ

_paging is a ratio of power allocated to a paging channel,

ξ

_sync is a ratio of power allocated to a sync channel, and

E_c/I_t is strength of a pilot channel signal being received from a mobile station.

6. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein a value of the dummy pilot power allocation ratio ξ

_{pilot,(FA2,1)} to equalize said coverage is determined as follows;

${\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}=\frac{\left(1+\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}-\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>\left(\frac{1}{F_1}-\frac{1}{F_2}<br><br>\left({\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{paging}}+{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{sync}}\right)\right)}{1+\frac{E_c}{I_t}-\frac{E_c}{I_t}·<br><br>\frac{1}{F_2}}.$

7. A method for optimizing coverage of a multi-frequency assignment system of a wireless communications system, so as to equalize coverage for each frequency assignment, said wireless communications system including at least first and second base stations allocated for respective geographic cells, with said first base station configured to transmit communication signals to subscriber terminals using at least a first frequency allocation (FA#1) and a second frequency allocation (FA#2), said second base station configured to transmit communication signals to subscriber terminals using said FA#1 substantially more frequently than said FA#2, said method comprising the steps of:

(a) checking paths of forward and reverse links using a power allocation ratio for a dummy pilot at FA#2 transmitted by said second base station, said dummy pilot power allocation ratio being sufficient to substantially equalize a handoff boundary between said first and second cells for handoffs at said FA#1 and FA#2;

(b) confirming a transmit attenuation value (Tx_Atten) for FA#1;

(c) reducing a value of Tx_Atten for FA#2 by a predetermined amount relative to said value of Tx_Atten for FA#1;

(d) measuring radio frequency (RF) output of FA#2;

(e) comparing the RF output value for FA#1 to said measured RF output value for FA#2;

(f) adjusting the value of Tx_Atten for FA#2 by an amount in accordance with said dummy power allocation ratio, so that RF output power for said dummy pilot is less than RF output power for a pilot channel at FA#1 of said second base station according to said dummy pilot allocation ratio, whereby said handoff boundary is substantially equalized in an environment of more communication traffic and interference at FA#1 than for FA#2.

8. The method as set forth in claim 7, wherein said communications system is a CDMA system.

9. The method as set forth in claim 7, wherein the dummy pilot power allocation ratio is based on a threshold value of pilot signal strength E_c/I_t and values of frequency reuse efficiency for FA#1 and FA#2.

10. The method as set forth in claim 7, wherein path loss of service area of said second base station at FA#1 is determined as follows:

$L<br><br>\left(r_{\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}\right)=\frac{\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>N_0<br><br>W}{P_t<br><br>G_c<br><br>G_m<br><br>\left[{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}-\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>\left(\frac{1}{F_1}-{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}\right)\right]}$

where,

F₁ is frequency reuse efficiency at a distance r from said second base station for FA#1,

P_t is base station transmit power,

G_c is base station antenna gain including feeder line cable loss,

G_m is mobile station antenna gain including feeder line cable loss,

E_c is energy per chip code,

I_t is total interference as a summation of cell interference, other cell interference and background noise,

N₀ is thermal noise density,

W is channel bandwidth,

ξ

_{pilot,(FA1,1)} is a ratio of power allocated to a pilot channel for FA#1 in said second base station, and

E_c/I_t is the strength of a pilot channel signal being received from a mobile station.

11. The method as set forth in claim 10, wherein path loss of a service area of said second base station forward link for FA#2 is determined as follows:

$L<br><br>\left(r_{\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}\right)=\frac{\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>N_0<br><br>W}{P_t<br><br>G_c<br><br>G_m<br><br>\left[{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}-\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>\left({\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}+<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{paging}}+{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{sync}}\right)<br><br>\left(\frac{1}{F_2}\right)+\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}\right]}$

where

F₂ is frequency reuse efficiency at said distance r from said second base station for FA#2,

ξ

_{pilot,(FA 2,1)} is a ratio of power allocated to the pilot channel for FA#2 in said second base station, and

E_c/I_t is strength of a pilot channel signal being received from a mobile station.

12. The method as set forth in claim 11, wherein a value of the dummy pilot power allocation ratio ξ

_{pilot,(FA 2,1)} to equalize said coverage is determined as follows;

${\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA2},1\right)}=\frac{\left(1+\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{pilot},\left(\mathrm{FA1},1\right)}-\left(\frac{E_c}{I_t}\right)<br><br>\left(\frac{1}{F_1}-\frac{1}{F_2}<br><br>\left({\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{paging}}+{\mathrm{\xi <br><br>}}_{\mathrm{sync}}\right)\right)}{1+\frac{E_c}{I_t}-\frac{E_c}{I_t}·<br><br>\frac{1}{F_2}}.$

13. The method as set forth in claim 12, wherein an environment to calculate the ratio of pilot power allocation for said FA#2 includes a cell radius of 3000 m, a maximum base station transmit power of 25 W, a ratio of pilot power allocation for FA#1 of 0.15, a ratio of dummy paging power allocation for FA#1 and FA#2 of 0.63×

ξ

_{pilot,(FA1,1)}=0.0945, a ratio of sync power allocation for FA#1 and FA#2 of 0.20×

ξ

_{pilot,(FA1,1)}=0.30, T_ADD=−

15 dB, and a full loading condition.