Computer-controlled navigation process for a vehicle equipped with a terminal, terminal and traffic information center

• US 6,199,009 B1
• Filed: 06/16/1999
• Issued: 03/06/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 12/16/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Sirius XM Connected Vehicle Services Inc. (Liberty Media Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Mannesmann Sachs AG (Zeppelin - Stiftung der Stadt Friedrichshafen)
• Inventors: Meis, Josef, Stangier, Peter, Oppler, Jens
• Primary Examiner(s): Cuchlinski, Jr., William A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Hernandez, Olga
• Application Number:
  US09/331,106
• Time in Patent Office: 629 Days
• Field of Search: 701/202, 701/205, 701/210, 701/117, 340/991, 340/992, 340/993, 340/994
• US Class Current: 701/202
• CPC Class Codes: G01C 21/3484 Personalized, e.g. from learned user behaviour or user-defined profiles
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096811 where the route is computed offboard
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096844 where the complete route is dynamically recomputed based on new data
• CPC Class Codes: G08G 1/096888 where input information is obtained using learning systems, e.g. history databases

Abstract

Navigation of a vehicle in a traffic network is optimized by a terminal, a traffic information center and a computer-assisted navigation method for a vehicle equipped with a terminal in a traffic network, using a digital map of the traffic network, in which a user requests a desired destination from the terminal and in which a route to the destination is determined, taking into account previous driving habits.

Claims

1. A traffic information center for a computer assisted navigation system for a vehicle, comprising:

a processor connected to a memory, a user interface and an input device, configured for determining a first recommended route to a desired destination, monitoring a current position of the vehicle as the vehicle travels toward the desired destination, determining whether the vehicle turns off of the first recommended route, performing a plausibility check when it is determined that the vehicle has turned off of the first recommended route to determine whether the turn off of the first recommended route was inadvertent and determining a second recommended route in response to the result of the plausibility check; and

a communications device connected to said processor for transmitting and receiving data from a terminal in the vehicle, said data comprising a desired destination, current location of the vehicle, and data relating to said first and second preferred routes produced in said traffic information center.

2. The traffic information center of claim 1, wherein said communications device comprises a mobile radio device.

3. A terminal for a computer assisted navigation system of a vehicle, comprising:

a processor connected to a memory, a user interface and an input device, said processor configured for determining a first recommended route to a desired destination, monitoring a current position of the vehicle as the vehicle travels toward said desired destination, determining whether the vehicle turns off of the first recommended route, performing a plausibility check when it is determined that the vehicle has turned off of the first recommended route to determine whether the turn off of the first recommended route was inadvertent, and determining a second recommended route as a result of the output of the plausibility check.

4. The terminal of claim 3, further comprising a Global Positioning System (GPS).

5. The terminal of claim 3, wherein said memory comprises a digital map of a traffic network.

6. The terminal of claim 3, further comprising a communications device for receiving data regarding said first and second recommended routes from a traffic information center.

7. The terminal of claim 6, wherein said communications device comprises a radio.

8. A method for computer assisted navigation of a vehicle having a terminal in a traffic network, comprising the steps of:

receiving a desired destination at the terminal in the vehicle as a user input;

determining a first recommended route to the desired destination taking into account previous driving habits;

monitoring a current position of the vehicle as the vehicle travels towards the desired destination;

determining whether the vehicle turns off of the first recommended route;

performing a plausibility check when it is determined that the vehicle has turned off of the recommended route to determine whether the turn off of the recommended route was inadvertent; and

determining a second recommended route in response to the step of performing a plausibility check.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein, if the vehicle turns off of the first recommended route onto a relatively low category road, said step of determining a second recommended route takes into account the relatively low category road.

10. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of performing a plausibility check takes into account an actual rate of travel of the vehicle on said first recommended route before the turn off;

and

said step of determining a second recommended route excludes using said first recommended route at least over a defined distance from the current vehicle position if the actual rate of travel is determined to be slower than an expected rate of travel.

11. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of performing a plausibility check comprises determining whether a traffic jam is reported on the first recommended route;

and

said step of determining a second recommended route excludes using said first recommended route at least over a defined distance from the current vehicle position where it is determined that a traffic jam is reported on the first recommended route.

12. The method of claim 8, wherein said steps of determining a first recommended route and determining a second recommended route are performed at the terminal of the vehicle.

13. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of determining whether the vehicle turns off of the recommended route comprises comparing the current position of the vehicle to the recommended route on a digital map.

14. The method of claim 8, further comprising a step of modifying parameters for said step of performing said plausibility check by transmitting commands from a traffic control center remote from the vehicle to the terminal in the vehicle.

15. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of determining a first recommended route and said step of determining a second recommended route comprise using traffic information for determining the first and second recommended routes.

16. The method of claim 8, wherein said steps of determining the first recommended route and the second recommended route comprise using distances on a digital map and journey times.

17. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of monitoring a current position of the vehicle comprises using a Global Positioning System (GPS).

18. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of monitoring a current position of the vehicle further comprises recording a current direction of travel using a compass.

19. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of monitoring a current position of the vehicle further comprises recording a current direction of travel by monitoring turns of a steering wheel of the vehicle.

20. The method of claim 8, wherein said step of monitoring a current position of the vehicle comprises monitoring the turns of a steering wheel of the vehicle and a distance meter.

21. The method of claim 8, wherein said steps of determining a first recommended route and determining a second recommended route are performed at a traffic information center remote from the vehicle.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising the steps of transmitting the first recommended route and the second recommended route to the terminal via radio.