Geosynchronous satellite communication system and method

• US 6,226,493 B1
• Filed: 05/31/1996
• Issued: 05/01/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 05/31/1996
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: CDC Propriete Intellectuelle
• Original Assignee: Motorola, Inc. (Motorola Solutions, Inc.)
• Inventors: Diekelman, Dennis Paul, Leopold, Raymond Joseph
• Primary Examiner(s): VO, NGUYEN THANH
• Application Number:
  US08/657,846
• Time in Patent Office: 1,796 Days
• Field of Search: 455/13.1, 455/12.1, 455/13.2, 455/11.1, 455/427, 244/158 R
• US Class Current: 455/13.1
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 7/19 Earth-synchronous stations

Abstract

A geosynchronous satellite system (10) uses crosslinks (30) between geosynchronous satellites (16) which travel along the same ground path (18) or are located within a common orbital slot (32) in order to increase traffic-carrying capacity and decrease signal delays. The geosynchronous satellites (16) can have substantial angles of inclination to provide high quality coverage within a wide range of latitudes (40, 42). In addition, the orbits can be elliptical, resulting in concentrated network capacity in either the northern or southern hemisphere. For co-positioned satellites (171-174), orbit perturbations are introduced in order to eliminate crosslink blockage caused by intervening satellites (172, 173). Methods for deploying and operating the geosynchronous satellite system enable network capacity to be modified (708) and routing (804), crosslinks (1008), and handoffs (908) to be controlled.

Claims

1. A satellite communication network comprising at least three geosynchronous satellites located within a common orbital slot,

wherein at least one satellite of the geosynchronous satellites has an angle of inclination which is greater than a nominal value such that the at least one satellite moves into and out of a communication range of at least one location on an earth'"'"'s surface;

and

wherein perturbations are applied to orbits of at least two satellites of the at least three satellites, and the perturbations are an increase in an angle of inclination of the orbit of a fraction of a degree, wherein an argument of perigee of the orbits is selected so that ground paths of the at least two satellites appear to rotate in opposite directions.

2. The satellite communication network as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least three geosynchronous satellites communicate with each other over at least one crosslink between the at least three geosynchronous satellites, and at least one satellite of the at least three geosynchronous satellites communicates with at least one ground device over a downlink between the at least one satellite and the at least one ground device.

3. The satellite communication network as claimed in claim 1, further comprising at least one additional geosynchronous satellite which has an angle of inclination which is not greater than the nominal value.

4. A satellite communication network comprising multiple geosynchronous satellites located within a common orbital slot,

wherein the multiple geosynchronous satellites communicate with each other over at least one crosslink between the multiple geosynchronous satellites, and at least one satellite of the multiple geosynchronous satellites communicates with at least one ground device over a downlink between the at least one satellite and the at least one ground device;

wherein the multiple geosynchronous satellites comprise at least three satellites which are located in orbits which are substantially co-linear throughout a period of orbit, and a perturbation is applied to an orbit of at least one satellite of the at least three satellites such that a crosslink between any two of the at least three satellites is not interrupted by a physical blockage of any other one of the at least three satellites; and

wherein perturbations are applied to orbits of at least two satellites of the at least three satellites, and the perturbations are an increase in an angle of inclination of the orbit of a fraction of a degree, wherein an argument of perigee of the orbits is selected so that ground paths of the at least two satellites appear to rotate in opposite directions.

5. The satellite communication network as claimed in claim 4, wherein a phase shift is added between the orbits of the at least two satellites.