Detection of saturation status for non-synchronous incremental actuators using a variable position estimate window

• US 6,265,843 B1
• Filed: 12/09/1999
• Issued: 07/24/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 12/09/1999
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Johnson Controls Technology Company (Johnson Controls International plc)
• Original Assignee: Johnson Controls Technology Company (Johnson Controls International plc)
• Inventors: West, Jonathan D., Chen, Jiade, Estill, Brian T.
• Primary Examiner(s): Masih, Karen
• Application Number:
  US09/458,142
• Time in Patent Office: 593 Days
• Field of Search: 318/468, 318/282, 318/280, 318/286, 318/466, 318/461, 318/463, 318/624
• US Class Current: 318/624
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 19/40 Open loop systems, e.g. using stepping motor
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/41246 Modulate command according to hystereris so that ideal curve is followed
• CPC Class Codes: G05B 2219/41401 Estimate position from max and min speeds in open loop

Abstract

A method for controlling non-synchronous actuators using a first and second estimate of the position of the actuator to create a variable position estimate window between which the actual position of the actuator is always bound. The first and second estimates of position are calculated based on the maximum and minimum speeds at which the actuator could be moving in each of first and second directions, and further wherein motion of the actuator in a saturated direction is disabled for as long as the first and second estimates converge at one of two final positions.

Claims

1. A method for controlling an actuator, the actuator capable of motion in first and second directions towards first and second positions, respectively, and capable of moving at a first speed in the first direction and at a second speed in the second direction, the method comprising the steps of:

(a) defining a first maximum speed and a first minimum speed for movement of the actuator in the first direction;

(b) defining a second maximum speed and a second minimum speed for movement of the actuator in the second direction;

(c) receiving a plurality of commands each indicating whether to move the actuator in the first or second direction and how far to move the actuator;

(d) driving the actuator for a period of time in response to each command;

(e) in response to each command, deriving a first position estimate wherein when the actuator moves in the first direction, the first position estimate is changed in response to the first maximum speed and the period of time, and when the actuator moves in the second direction, the first position estimate is changed in response to the second minimum speed and the period of time;

(f) in response to each command, deriving a second position estimate wherein when the actuator moves in the first direction, the second position estimate is changed in response to the first minimum speed and the period of time, and when the actuator moves in the second direction, the second position estimate is changed in response to the second maximum speed and the period of time;

(g) disabling movement of the actuator in the first direction when the second position estimate indicates that the actuator is in the first position; and

(h) disabling movement of the actuator in the second direction when the first position estimate indicates that the actuator is in the second position.

2. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of defining a first maximum speed and first minimum speed comprises defining the first maximum speed to be greater than the first speed, and defining the first minimum speed to be less than the first speed.

3. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of defining a second maximum speed and second minimum speed comprises defining the second maximum speed to be greater than the second speed, and defining the second minimum speed to be less than the second speed.

4. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of defining a first maximum speed and first minimum speed is in response to minimum and maximum possible stroke times required for the actuator to travel from the second position to the first position.

5. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the step of defining a second maximum speed and second minimum speed is in response to minimum and maximum possible stroke times required for the actuator to travel from the first position to the second position.

6. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the first speed is greater than the second speed.

7. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the second speed is greater than the first speed.

8. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the first and second position estimates cannot be greater than the first position.

9. The method as recited in claim 1 wherein the first and second position estimates cannot be less than the second position.