Magnetic lock and status detection system and method therefor

• US 6,271,751 B1
• Filed: 08/24/1999
• Issued: 08/07/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 08/24/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Hanchett Entry Systems Incorporated (Assa Abloy AB)
• Original Assignee: Securitron Magnalock Corporation (Assa Abloy AB)
• Inventors: Hunt, Robert C., Kumar, Senthil
• Primary Examiner(s): Crosland, Donnie L.
• Application Number:
  US09/382,012
• Time in Patent Office: 714 Days
• Field of Search: 340/514, 340/515, 340/542, 340/545.1, 70/91, 702/62, 702/63, 702/64, 702/77, 324/260, 324/263, 324/527, 324/227, 324/228, 335/253, 335/295, 318/266, 318/430, 318/53, 318/54
• US Class Current: 340/514
• CPC Class Codes: E05B 2047/0067 Monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: E05C 19/166 electromagnetic
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/08 by opening, e.g. of door, of window, of drawer, of shutter, of curtain, of blind
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 70/625 Operation and control

Abstract

An electromagnetic lock and status detection system and method therefor includes an armature, an electromagnet, and a status detection unit. The electromagnet is magnetically attracted to the armature into a mating relationship. A relatively high inductance is established in the electromagnet when the electromagnet is properly mated with the armature, and a relatively low inductance is established in the electromagnet when the electromagnet is not properly mated with armature. The status detection unit is coupled to the electromagnet to monitor the locking strength between the electromagnet and the armature. The unit monitors the locking strength by altering voltage level provided to the electromagnet and measuring the counter EMF induced in the electromagnet.

Claims

1. A method of detecting the status of an electromagnetic lock assembly, comprising:

providing an electromagnet and an armature;

magnetically attracting the electromagnet and the armature into a mating relationship by providing power to the electromagnet; and

monitoring locking strength between the electromagnet and the armature,

switching off the power to the electromagnet for a short period of time less than 30 milliseconds to induce a counter EMF pulse in the electromagnet while maintaining secure holding force; and

measuring the counter EMF pulse at a predetermined time while the power to the electromagnet is switched off for said short period of time.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising mounting the armature on a door and mounting the electromagnet on a frame of the door for relative movement between a closed position whereby the armature properly engages the electromagnet, and an opened position whereby the door is opened and the armature is spaced from the electromagnet.

3. The method of claim 2, further comprising comparing the counter EMF to a threshold voltage range;

wherein the door is opened and unsecured when the electromagnet is completely separated from the armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is zero at the end of the short period of time;

wherein the door is closed and unsecured when a relatively large air gap is between the electromagnet and armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is below the threshold voltage range;

wherein the door is closed and secured when the electromagnet is fully coupled to the armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is within the threshold voltage range; and

wherein the door is closed and unsecured when a relatively small gap is between the electromagnet and armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is greater than the threshold voltage range.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the threshold voltage range is greater than 90 volts and less than 150 volts.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising:

providing an electromagnet power supply to energize the electromagnet;

providing a status detection unit for said step of monitoring the locking strength between the electromagnet and the armature; and

operatively placing the status detection unit in series between the electromagnet power supply and a lead of the electromagnet.

6. The method of claim 1, whereby the electromagnetic lock assembly is secured and remains secured during the short period of time due to a magnetic inertia of the electromagnet.

7. The method of claim 1, whereby the power to the electromagnet is switched off about once every two minutes.

8. The method of claim 1, whereby the short period of time is about fifteen milliseconds.

9. The method of claim 7, whereby the counter EMF is measured just prior to restoring the power to the electromagnet.

10. A method of detecting whether an electromagnetic lock assembly is properly closed and secured, comprising:

characterizing electrical response characteristics of an electromagnet as a function of time and further as a function of a distance between the electromagnet and an armature;

determining an appropriate time for measuring the electrical response after a voltage input to the electromagnet has been switched;

switching power to the electromagnet for a brief period of time to provide a counter EMF pulse while maintaining a secure holding force;

waiting a time period equal to the appropriate time;

detecting the electrical response from said pulse at the determined appropriate time; and

correlating the electrical response to a secured or unsecured status of the electromagnetic lock assembly.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein one of the electrical response characteristics is an induced counter EMF.

12. The method of claim 10, wherein the electrical response characteristics are reactance characteristics.

13. The method of claim 10, wherein said step of detecting the electrical response characteristics includes measuring a counter EMF induced in the electromagnet.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein said step of switching power to the electromagnet includes switching off the power to the electromagnet.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein locking strength remains sufficient to prevent forced separation of the electromagnet and the armature when the power to the electromagnet is switched off due to the magnetic inertia of the electromagnet.

16. The method of claim 14, wherein said step of correlating the electrical response includes comparing the counter EMF to a threshold voltage range;

wherein the electromagnetic lock assembly is opened and unsecured when the electromagnet is completely separated from the armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is zero at the appropriate time;

wherein the electromagnetic lock assembly is closed and unsecured when a relatively large air gap is between the electromagnet and armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is below the threshold range;

wherein the electromagnetic lock assembly is closed and secured when the electromagnet is fully coupled to the armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is within the threshold voltage range; and

wherein the electromagnetic lock assembly is closed and unsecured when a relatively small gap is between the electromagnet and armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is greater than the threshold voltage range.

17. The method of claim 14, wherein the electromagnet is switched off for about 15 milliseconds.

18. The method of claim 10, further comprising attaching the armature on a door and attaching the electromagnet on a frame of the door for relative movement between a closed position whereby the armature properly engages the electromagnet, and an opened position whereby the door is opened and the armature is spaced from the electromagnet.

19. The method of claim 10, further comprising:

providing an electromagnet power supply to power the electromagnet;

providing a status detection unit for said step of monitoring the locking power between the electromagnet and the armature; and

operatively placing the status detection unit in series between the electromagnet power supply and respective plus and minus leads of the electromagnet.

20. The method of claim 10, whereby the electromagnetic lock assembly remains secured when the power to the electromagnet is switched off due to a magnetic inertia of the electromagnet.

21. The method of claim 10, whereby the power to the electromagnet is periodically switched off about once every two minutes.

22. The method of claim 10, whereby the short period of time is about fifteen milliseconds.

23. The method of claim 13, wherein said step of switching the power to the electromagnet includes increasing the power to the electromagnet, and wherein said step of correlating the electrical response includes comparing the counter EMF to a threshold voltage range.

24. The method of claim 13, wherein said step of switching the power to the electromagnet includes decreasing the power to the electromagnet, and wherein said step of correlating the electrical response includes comparing the counter EMF to a threshold voltage range.

25. An apparatus for detecting whether an electromagnetic lock is properly secured, comprising:

a switch for altering a voltage level provided to the electromagnetic lock;

a sensor for detecting an EMF produced within the electromagnetic lock in response to the voltage level being altered;

an electromagnet;

an armature magnetically attracted to the electromagnet into a mating relationship;

a power supply for supplying the voltage level;

a door on which the armature is mounted;

a door frame on which the electromagnet is mounted such that the relative movement of the door between a closed position whereby the armature engages the electromagnet, and an opened position whereby the door is open and the armature is spaced from the electromagnet;

a status detection unit;

wherein the switch turns off power to the electromagnet for a short time period and the EMF is a counter EMF wherein the sensor detects the counter EMF and the status detection unit compares the counter EMF with a threshold voltage;

wherein the door is opened and unsecured when the electromagnet is completely separated from the armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is substantially zero at the appropriate time;

wherein the door is closed and unsecured when a relatively large air gap is between the electromagnet and armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is below the threshold range;

wherein the door is closed and secured when the electromagnet is fully coupled to the armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is within the threshold voltage range; and

wherein the door is closed and unsecured when a relatively small gap is between the electromagnet and armature, and the counter EMF in the electromagnet is greater than the threshold voltage range.

26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein a locking strength of the electromagnetic lock during the short time period is sufficient to prevent the door from being forcibly opened.

27. A magnetic lock and status detection system, comprising:

an armature;

an electromagnet magnetically attracted to the armature into a mating relationship;

a status detection unit coupled to the electromagnet to monitor the locking strength between the electromagnet and the armature, wherein the unit switches off power to the electromagnet for a short period of time while maintaining secure holding force, and measures a counter EMF pulse induced in the electromagnet.

28. The system of claim 27, further comprising:

a door on which the armature is mounted; and

a door frame on which the electromagnet is mounted such that relative movement of the door between a closed position whereby the armature engages the electromagnet, and an open position whereby the door is open and the armature is spaced from the electromagnet.

29. The system of claim 27, further comprising a threshold voltage range;

wherein the status detection unit indicates that the door is opened and unsecured when the armature is completely separated from the electromagnet such that the counter EMF is zero at the end of the short period of time;

wherein the status detection unit indicates that the door is closed and unsecured when a relatively large air gap is between the electromagnet and armature such that the counter EMF in the electromagnet is below the threshold voltage range;

wherein the status detection unit indicates that the door is closed and secured when the electromagnet is fully coupled to the armature such that the counter EMF in the electromagnet is within the threshold voltage range; and

wherein the status detection unit indicates that the door is closed and unsecured when a relatively small air gap is between the electromagnet and armature such that the counter EMF in the electromagnet is greater than the threshold voltage range.

30. The system of claim 27, wherein the door remains in a secured state when the electromagnet is switched off for the short period of time due to a magnetic inertia of the electromagnet.

31. The system of claim 27, wherein the electromagnet includes an electromagnetic coil, wherein a collapsing magnetic field induces the counter EMF, and the counter EMF is measured just prior to restoring the power to the electromagnet, wherein the counter EMF is within a particular threshold range when the electromagnet is properly mated with the armature, and wherein the counter EMF is outside the particular threshold range when the electromagnet is not properly mated with the armature.

32. The system of claim 27, wherein the counter EMF is measured when the power is restored to the electromagnet.

33. The system of claim 27, wherein the counter EMF is measured immediately before restoring power to the electromagnet.

34. A method of detecting the status of an electromagnetic lock assembly, comprising:

providing an electromagnet and an armature;

magnetically attracting the electromagnet and the armature into a mating relationship by providing power to the electromagnet; and

monitoring locking strength between the electromagnet and the armature, comprising;

switching off the power to the electromagnet for a short period of time less than 30 milliseconds to induce a counter EMF pulse in the electromagnet while maintaining secure holding force;

measuring the counter EMF pulse during said short period of time; and

actuating a status detection circuit responsive to the measurement of the counter EMF pulse.

35. A method as defined in claim 34 wherein said security indicating circuit is actuated only if said counter EMF pulse is within a predetermined range, and is not above or below said range.