Electronic information network for inventory control and transfer

• US 6,324,522 B2
• Filed: 09/15/1998
• Issued: 11/27/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 09/15/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: MRO Software, Inc. (International Business Machines Corporation)
• Inventors: Peterson, Larry C., Kwiatkowski, Steven E.
• Primary Examiner(s): Trammell, James P.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Hayes, John W.
• Application Number:
  US09/153,705
• Publication Number:
  US 20010011232A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,169 Days
• Field of Search: 705/28, 705/22, 705/29, 705/10, 705/26
• US Class Current: 705/28
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/08 Logistics, e.g. warehousing, loading or distribution; Inventory or stock management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/0875 Itemisation or classification of parts, supplies or services, e.g. bill of materials
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 20/203 Inventory monitoring
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/06 Buying, selling or leasing transactions
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0601 Electronic shopping [e-shopping]

Abstract

A process for distributing items, especially industrial maintenance repair and operating (MRO) parts and supplies. The process includes as a first step providing a plurality of vendors for selling the item. Next, an information network by which each vendor can communicate to the other vendors a current inventory quantity and a current price of the item each of the vendors has for sale. A last step includes establishing an agreement among the vendors in which a first vendor agrees to sell to a second vendor, upon demand at a future point in time, up to the then current inventory quantity of the item at the then current price communicated over the information network by the first vendor to the second vendor

Claims

1. A process for distributing items, including the steps of:

(a) providing a plurality of vendors for selling an item;

(b) providing an information network by which information about the respective quantity and price of said item each of said vendors has for sale can be shared among vendors, said information network including a Depot portion that includes an Inventory Network function;

(c) merging said information with information that has previously been sent to the information network;

(d) establishing an agreement among said vendors in which each of said vendors agrees to sell to any other of said vendors up to said respective quantity of said item at said respective price;

(e) selecting to utilize the Inventory Network function;

(f) viewing a list of networks available to the particular user displayed by said information network;

(g) selecting an information network to utilize;

(h) selecting a child component that is a sub-component of an assembly; and

(i) calculating the maximum number of said assemblies that could be built if said child component were the critical constraint.

2. A process for distributing items, including the steps of:

(a) providing a plurality of vendors for selling an item;

(b) providing an information network by which information about the respective quantity and price of said item each of said vendors has for sale can be shared among vendors, said information network including a Depot portion that includes an Inventory Network function;

(c) merging said information with information that has previously been sent to the information network;

(d) establishing an agreement among said vendors in which each of said vendors agrees to sell to any other of said vendors up to said respective quantity of said item at said respective price;

(e) selecting to utilize the Inventory Network function;

(f) viewing a list of networks available to the particular user displayed by said information network;

(g) selecting an information network to utilize;

(h) selecting a child component that is a sub-component of an assembly; and

(i) calculating the maximum number of said assemblies that can be built based on the number of sub-components of the assembly that are available.

3. The process of claim 2 further including the step of utilizing an iterative loop to determine said maximum number.

4. The process of claim 3 wherein said iterative loop further includes the steps of (a) selecting a child component that is a sub-component of an assembly, (b) calculating the number of said assemblies that could be built if said child component were the critical constraint, (c) comparing the number against an existing constraint if any exists, (d) saving the lower of the two numbers as the existing constraint, and (e) continuing steps (b) through (d) until all sub-assemblies have been considered.