Purge monitor/switch rationality diagnostics

• US 6,327,901 B1
• Filed: 08/30/1999
• Issued: 12/11/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 08/30/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: FCA US LLC (Stellantis NV)
• Original Assignee: Daimler Chrysler Corporation (Mercedes-Benz Group AG)
• Inventors: Booms, Chris J., Blomquist, William B., Dawson, Gary D.
• Primary Examiner(s): MCCALL, ERIC SCOTT
• Application Number:
  US09/386,095
• Time in Patent Office: 834 Days
• Field of Search: 731/16, 731/172, 731/173, 731/181, 340/438, 340/439
• US Class Current: 73/114.39
• CPC Class Codes: F02M 25/0809 Judging failure of purge control system

Abstract

A method is provided for determining the rationality of a device for monitoring the pressure within an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle. The method includes opening a valve of the evaporative emission control system and determining if a vacuum switch of the evaporative emission control system opened. If the vacuum switch opened, a code is set indicating that the vacuum switch passed an opening test. If the vacuum switch did not open, the method determines if a fail timer is greater than a first fail threshold value. The first fail threshold value corresponds to an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should open after said valve is opened. If the fail timer is greater than the fail threshold value, the method sets a code indicating that the vacuum switch failed the opening test. If the fail timer is less than or equal to the first fail threshold value, the method increments the fail timer. If the vacuum switch passed the opening test, the method closes the valve of the evaporative emission control system and applies a vacuum thereto. The method then determines if the vacuum switch closed due to the vacuum. If the vacuum switch closed, the method sets a code indicating that the vacuum switch passed a closing test. If the vacuum switch did not close, the method determines if the fail timer is greater than a second fail threshold value. The second fail threshold value corresponds to an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should close after the vacuum is applied. If the fail timer is greater than the second fail threshold value, the method sets a code indicating that the vacuum switch failed the closing test. If the fail timer is less than or equal to the second fail threshold value, the method increments the fail timer.

Claims

1. A method of determining a rationality of a device for monitoring pressure within an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle comprising:

opening a valve of said evaporative emission control system leading to atmosphere;

determining if a vacuum switch of said evaporative emission control system opened;

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch passed an opening test if said vacuum switch opened;

determining if a fail timer of said evaporative emission control system is greater than a first fail threshold value if said vacuum switch did not open; and

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch failed said opening test if said fail timer is greater than said first fail threshold value.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising incrementing said fail timer if said fail timer is less than or equal to said first fail threshold value.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein said first fail threshold value further comprises an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should open after said valve is opened.

4. A method of determining a rationality of a device for monitoring pressure within an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle comprising:

opening a valve of said evaporative emission control system leading to atmosphere;

determining if a vacuum switch of said evaporative emission control system opened;

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch passed an opening test if said vacuum switch opened;

determining if a fail timer of said evaporative emission control system is greater than a first fail threshold value if said vacuum switch did not open;

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch failed said opening test if said fail timer is greater than said first fail threshold value;

closing said valve of said evaporative emission control system if said vacuum switch passed said opening test;

applying a vacuum to said evaporative emission control system;

determining if said vacuum switch closed due to said vacuum;

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch passed a closing test if said vacuum switch closed;

determining if said fail timer is greater than a second fail threshold value if said vacuum switch did not close; and

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch failed said closing test if said fail timer is greater than said second fail threshold value.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprising incrementing said fail timer if said fail timer is less than or equal to said second fail threshold value.

6. The method of claim 4 wherein said second fail threshold value further comprises an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should close after said vacuum is applied.

7. The method of claim 4 wherein said vacuum is applied by a manifold of said automotive vehicle.

8. The method of claim 4 wherein said vacuum is applied for a predetermined period of time based upon fuel level.

9. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

re-opening said valve of said evaporative emission control system if said vacuum switch passed said closing test;

determining if said vacuum switch re-opened;

setting said code indicating that said vacuum switch passed said opening test if said vacuum switch re-opened;

determining if said fail timer is greater than said first fail threshold value if said vacuum switch did not re-open; and

setting said code indicating that said vacuum switch failed said opening test if said fail timer is greater than said first fail threshold value.

10. The method of claim 9 further comprising incrementing said fail timer if said fail timer is less than or equal to said first fail threshold value.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein said first fail threshold value further comprises an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should open after said valve is opened.

12. The method of claim 4 further comprising:

determining if said vacuum switch failed said closing test due to one of a set of conditions including a switch stuck open condition, a gross leak condition, or a purge monitor failure condition if said fail timer is greater than said fail threshold value; and

setting a code indicating which of said conditions was determined.

13. The method of claim 4 further comprising incrementing said fail timer if said fail timer is less than or equal to said first fail threshold value.

14. A method of determining a rationality of a device for monitoring pressure within an evaporative emission control system of an automotive vehicle comprising:

closing a valve of said evaporative emission control system leading to atmosphere;

applying a vacuum to said evaporative emission control system;

determining if a vacuum switch of said evaporative emission control system closed due to said vacuum;

setting a code indicating that said vacuum switch passed a closing test if said vacuum switch closed;

determining if a fail timer of said evaporative emission control system is greater than a first fail threshold value if said vacuum switch did not close;

setting a first code indicating that said vacuum switch failed said closing test if said fail timer is greater than said first fail threshold value;

re-opening said valve of said evaporative emission control system if said vacuum switch passed said closing test;

determining if said vacuum switch re-opened;

setting a second code indicating that said vacuum switch passed an opening test if said vacuum switch re-opened;

determining if said fail timer is greater than a second fail threshold value if said vacuum switch did not re-open; and

setting said code indicating that said vacuum switch failed said opening test if said fail timer is greater than said second fail threshold value.

15. The method of claim 14 further comprising incrementing said fail timer if said fail timer is less than or equal to said first fail threshold value.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein said first fail threshold value further comprises an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should close after said vacuum is applied.

17. The method of claim 14 wherein said vacuum is applied by a manifold of said automotive vehicle.

18. The method of claim 14 wherein said vacuum is applied for a predetermined period of time based upon fuel level.

19. The method of claim 14 further comprising incrementing said fail timer if said fail timer is less than or equal to said second fail threshold value.

20. The method of claim 14 wherein said second fail threshold value further comprises an amount of time within which a properly functioning vacuum switch should re-open after said valve is opened.