Train handling techniques and analysis

• US 6,332,106 B1
• Filed: 09/16/1999
• Issued: 12/18/2001
• Est. Priority Date: 09/16/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: New York Air Brake Corporation (Knorr-Bremse GmbH)
• Original Assignee: New York Air Brake Corporation (Knorr-Bremse GmbH)
• Inventors: Nickles, Stephen K., Onodipe, Bolanle, Hawthorne, Michael J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Cuchlinski, Jr., William A.
• Assistant Examiner(s): DONNELLY, ARTHUR D
• Application Number:
  US09/397,667
• Time in Patent Office: 824 Days
• Field of Search: 701/19, 701/117, 701/35, 701/70, 324/160, 377/24, 377/24.1, 377/26
• US Class Current: 701/19
• CPC Class Codes: B61L 27/60 Testing or simulation
• CPC Class Codes: G09B 9/04 for teaching control of land vehicles

Abstract

This is a method of analyzing train handling by setting a standard for the run, collecting train operating or handling data from the run and determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard run. The determination of operating constraints during a run also includes determining differences between the operating constraints during the run of those included in the standard. The train handling data is compared to the standard and the comparison is adjusted for the operating constraints. The adjustment of the comparison includes nullifying any deviation of the handling data from the standard resulting from the operating constraints. A report is created from the standard and the handling data correlating the energy usage for specific categories. These categories include one or more of pneumatic braking, dynamic braking and track topology. The report further includes energy adjustments for the operating constraints determined during the run.

Claims

1. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard; and

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the standard, the handling data and operating constrains are correlated for a respective section of the run.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the comparison is modified by nullifying any deviation of the handling data from the standard for that section of the run that includes the operating constraint.

4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the comparison is modified by substituting the handling data for the standard in the section.

5. A method according to claim 2, including defining boundaries of the sections using one or more of the following handling data:

speed, acceleration/deceleration, slack action, propulsion settings, brake settings and position.

6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the modification includes substituting the handling data of the standard for that section of the run in which an operating constraint occurred.

7. A method according to claim 6, including defining boundaries of the sections using one or more of the handling data:

speed, acceleration/deceleration, slack action, propulsion settings, brake settings and position.

8. A method according to claim 1, wherein setting the standard includes determining equipment limitations which includes one or more of time constants for change of tractive effort, time constants for changes in dynamic braking and time constants for changes in pneumatic braking.

9. A method according to claim 1, wherein determining operating constraints also includes determining differences between operating constrains during the run and those included in the standard.

10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the standard is set by weighting one or more of fuel usage, in-train forces and run duration.

13. A method according to claim 10, including determining and displaying energy of the train run related to idle.

14. A method according to claim 10, wherein the amount of energy is determined for pneumatic and dynamic braking for slow downs, balancing grade and power braking and displayed.

15. A method according to claim 10, wherein the amount of energy is determined for rail topography for curve resistance, grade resistance and rolling resistance and displayed.

11. A method of creating an energy report of a train run comprising:

determining the amount of energy of a train run related to each of pneumatic braking, dynamic braking and track topography; and

displaying the results.

12. A method according to claim 11, including setting a standard amount of energy for the pneumatic braking, dynamic braking and track topography and displaying it with the respective determined value.

16. A method according to claim 12, including determining and displaying energy related to operating conditions of the run not taken into account in the standard amount.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein the operating conditions include stop and slow down orders.

18. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard; and

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints including nullifying any deviation of the handling data from the standard resulting from the operating constraints.

19. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run including determining operating practices which include one or more of speed limits, run-in/run-out force limitations and steady state draft and buff forces;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard; and

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints.

20. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run using one or more of the following operating constraints;

standing slow orders, track occupancy permits, spaced restriction zones and general operating bulletins;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard; and

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints.

21. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints, including one or more of meet and pass orders, traffic signal designations and order to siding for a stop, during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard; and

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints.

22. A method according to claim 21, wherein other operating constraints determined during the run for comparison to operating constraints included in the standard includes one or more of standing slow orders, track occupancy permits, speed restriction zones and general operating bulletins.

23. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run taking advantage of rail topography of the run in the use of braking and propulsion;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard; and

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints.

24. A method according to claim 23, wherein the rail topography includes rail grade and curvature.

25. A method of analyzing train handling comprising:

setting a standard for a run;

collecting train handling data from the run;

determining operating constraints during the run which are not included in the standard;

comparing the train handling data to the standard;

modifying the comparison for the determined operating constraints; and

creating an energy usage report from the standard and the handling data which correlates the energy usage for specific categories.

26. A method according to claim 25, wherein the categories include one or more of pneumatic braking, dynamic braking and track topography.

27. A method according to claim 25, wherein the report further includes energy modifications for the operating constraints.