Regulating users of online forums

• US 6,336,133 B1
• Filed: 05/13/1998
• Issued: 01/01/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 05/20/1997
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Meta Platforms, Inc. (f/k/a Facebook, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: America Online Inc. (Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.)
• Inventors: Bosco, Eric, Morris, Harry W., Lippke, David Lowell, Steele, Colin Anthony
• Primary Examiner(s): Coulter, Kenneth R.
• Application Number:
  US09/076,483
• Time in Patent Office: 1,329 Days
• Field of Search: 709/204, 709/217, 709/218, 709/219, 709/225, 345/330
• US Class Current: 709/204
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/31 User authentication
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 21/6218 to a system of files or objects, e.g. local or distributed file system or database
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1822 Conducting the conference, e.g. admission, detection, selection or grouping of participants, correlating users to one or more conference sessions, prioritising transmission
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/1831 Tracking arrangements for later retrieval, e.g. recording contents, participants activities or behavior, network status
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 12/185 with management of multicast group membership
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/04 Real-time or near real-time messaging, e.g. instant messaging [IM]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/102 Entity profiles
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 63/1441 Countermeasures against malicious traffic countermeasures against attacks on cryptographic mechanisms H04L9/002

Abstract

Regulating a user of a computer-based service includes receiving input about a first user from at least one other user of the computer-based service, determining a degree to which the at least one other user can influence a parameter associated with the first user, and modifying the first user'"'"'s parameter based on the received input and the determined degree of influence. The first user'"'"'s parameter, for example, can relate to the first user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service.

Claims

1. A method, performed on a computer system, of regulating an active user of a computer-based service, the method comprising:

(a) receiving input at the computer system about a first active user from at least one other active user of the computer-based service;

(b) determining at the computer system, and without human intervention, a degree to which the at least one other active user can influence a parameter associated with the first active user;

(c) modifying at the computer system, and without human intervention, the first active user'"'"'s parameter based on the received input and the determined degree of influence.

2. The method of claim 1, in which the first active user'"'"'s parameter remains unaffected when the degree of influence is determined to be zero.

3. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering a type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input.

4. The method of claim 3, further comprising determining that the at least one other active user can have a high degree of influence on the first active user'"'"'s parameter when the type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input was personally directed at the other active user.

5. The method of claim 3, further comprising determining that the at least one other active user can have a high degree of influence on the first active user'"'"'s parameter when the type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input was an Instant Message.

6. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering a behavioral index level of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

7. The method of claim 6, in which the consideration comprises comparing an active user'"'"'s behavioral index level to a predetermined threshold.

8. The method of claim 6, in which the consideration comprises comparing an active user'"'"'s behavioral index level to a dynamically shifting threshold.

9. The method of claim 6, in which the consideration comprises comparing the first active users behavioral index level to the at least one other active user'"'"'s behavioral index level.

10. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering a rate limiting state of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

11. The method of claim 10, in which the consideration comprises comparing an active user'"'"'s rate limiting state to a predetermined threshold.

12. The method of claim 10, in which the consideration comprises comparing an active user'"'"'s rate limiting state to a dynamically shifting threshold.

13. The method of claim 10, in which the consideration comprises comparing the first active user'"'"'s rate limiting state to the at least one other active users rate limiting state.

14. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering a resource usage level of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

15. The method of claim 14, in which the consideration comprises comparing an active user'"'"'s resource usage level to a predetermined threshold.

16. The method of claim 14, in which the consideration comprises comparing an active user'"'"'s resource usage level to a dynamically shifting threshold.

17. The method of claim 14, in which the consideration comprises comparing the first active user'"'"'s resource usage level to the at least one other active user'"'"'s resource usage level.

18. The method of claim 14, in which memory usage by an active user affects that active user'"'"'s resource usage level.

19. The method of claim 14, in which a number of forums occupied by an active user affects that active user'"'"'s resource usage level.

20. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering an amount of previous input about other active users submitted by the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

21. The method of claim 20, in which the amount of previous input about other active users is measured per session, per unit time, or per lifetime.

22. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering whether the first active user, the at least one other active user, or both, frequent forums associated with illegal activity.

23. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering previous complaints against the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

24. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering previous complaints against the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

25. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering an amount of revenue generated by the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

26. The method of claim 25, in which an active user'"'"'s generated revenue comprises subscription revenue, advertising revenue, or e-commerce revenue.

27. The method of claim 1, in which the determination of the degree of influence comprises considering messaging patterns of the first active user or of the at least one other active user or both.

28. The method of claim 27, in which an active user'"'"'s messaging pattern includes a number of other active users with whom regular contact is maintained.

29. The method of claim 27, in which an active user'"'"'s messaging pattern includes an indication of misbehavior by other active users with whom regular contact is maintained.

30. The method of claim 1, in which modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprises limiting the first active user'"'"'s permissible messaging rates.

31. The method of claim 1, in which modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprises limiting the first active user'"'"'s access to one or more forums.

32. The method of claim 1, in which modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprises modifying the first active user'"'"'s cost of using the computer-based service.

33. The method of claim 1, in which modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprises varying a degree of influence that the first active user has over another active user of the computer-based service.

34. The method of claim 1, further comprising:

(d) displaying information related to a current state of the first active user'"'"'s modified parameter.

35. The method of claim 1, in which determining the degree of influence comprises considering an interpersonal context between the first active user and the at least one other active user.

36. The method of claim 34, in which considering the interpersonal context comprises applying a function based on an ordering of events during an interaction of the first active user and the at least one other active user.

37. The method of claim 1, in which modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprises temporarily limiting the first active user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service if the input received from the at least one other active user constitutes a first occurrence of input about the first active user.

38. The method of claim 37, in which the temporary limitation on the first active user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service comprises a short-term limitation.

40. The method of claim 37, in which the capping of the degree of influence comprises applying a function based on an elapsed time since an occurrence of an action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input.

41. The computer program of claim 37, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions to consider a type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input.

42. The computer program of claim 37, in which the instructions determine that the at least one other active user can have a high degree of influence on the first active user'"'"'s parameter when the type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input was personally directed at the other active user.

43. The method of claim 1, in which determining the degree of influence comprises considering an interpersonal context between the first active user and the at least one other active user.

44. The method of claim 43, in which considering the interpersonal context comprises applying a function based on an ordering of events during an interaction of the first active user and the at least one other active user.

45. The method of claim 1, in which modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprises temporarily limiting the first active user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service if the input received from the at least one other active user constitutes a first occurrence of input about the first active user.

46. The method of claim 45, in which the temporary limitation on the first active user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service comprises a short-term limitation.

39. A computer program, residing on a computer-readable medium, for regulating an active user of a computer-based service, comprising instructions for causing a computer to perform the following operations:

(a) receive input about a first active user from at least one other active user of the computer-based service;

(b) determine a degree to which the at least one other active user can influence a parameter associated with the first active user;

(c) modify the first active user'"'"'s parameter based on the received input and the determined degree of influence.

47. A computer program, residing on a computer-readable medium, for regulating an active user of a computer-based service, comprising instructions for causing a computer to perform the following operations:

(a) receive input about a first active user from at least one other active user of the computer-based service;

(b) determine a degree to which the at least one other active user can influence a parameter associated with the first active user;

(c) modify the first active user'"'"'s parameter based on the received input and the, determined degree of influence.

48. The computer program of claim 47, in which the first active user'"'"'s parameter remains unaffected when the degree of influence is determined to be zero.

49. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions to consider a type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input.

50. The computer program of claim 49, in which the instructions determine that the at least one other active user can have a high degree of influence on the first active user'"'"'s parameter when the type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input was personally directed at the other active user.

51. The computer program of claim 49, in which the instructions determine that the at least one other active user can have a high degree of influence on the first active user'"'"'s parameter when the type of action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input was an Instant Message.

52. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering a behavioral index level of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

53. The computer program of claim 52, in which the instructions for considering a behavioral index level comprise instructions for comparing an active user'"'"'s behavioral index level to a predetermined threshold.

54. The computer program of claim 52, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing an active user'"'"'s behavioral index level to a dynamically shifting threshold.

55. The computer program of claim 52, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing the first active user'"'"'s behavioral index level to the at least one other active user'"'"'s behavioral index level.

56. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering a rate limiting state of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

57. The computer program of claim 56, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing an active user'"'"'s rate limiting state to a predetermined threshold.

58. The computer program of claim 56, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing an active user'"'"'s rate limiting state to a dynamically shifting threshold.

59. The computer program of claim 56, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing the first active user'"'"'s rate limiting state to the at least one other active user'"'"'s rate limiting state.

60. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering a resource usage level of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

61. The computer program of claim 60, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing an active user'"'"'s resource usage level to a predetermined threshold.

62. The computer program of claim 60, in which the instructions for considering comprise instructions for comparing an active user'"'"'s resource usage level to a dynamically shifting threshold.

63. The computer program of claim 60, in which the instructions for consideration comprise instructions for comparing the first active user'"'"'s resource usage level to the at least one other active user'"'"'s resource usage level.

64. The computer program of claim 60, in which memory usage by an active user affects that active user'"'"'s resource usage level.

65. The computer program of claim 60, in which a number of forums occupied by an active user affects that active user'"'"'s resource usage level.

66. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering an amount of previous input about other active users submitted by the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

67. The computer program of claim 66, in which the amount of previous input about other active users is measured per session, per unit time, or per lifetime.

68. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering whether the first active user, the at least one other active user, or both, frequent forums associated with illegal activity.

69. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprise instructions for modifying the first active user'"'"'s cost of using the computer-based service.

70. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering previous complaints against the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

71. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering an amount of revenue generated by the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

72. The computer program of claim 71, in which an active user'"'"'s generated revenue comprises subscription revenue, advertising revenue, or e-commerce revenue.

73. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions to determine the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering messaging patterns of the first active user or the at least one other active user or both.

74. The computer program of claim 73, in which an active user'"'"'s messaging pattern includes a number of other active users with whom regular contact is maintained.

75. The computer program of claim 73, in which an active user'"'"'s messaging pattern includes an indication of misbehavior by other active users with whom regular contact is maintained.

76. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprise instructions for limiting the first active user'"'"'s permissible messaging rates.

77. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprise instructions for limiting the first active user'"'"'s access to one or more forums.

78. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprise instructions for modifying the first active user'"'"'s cost of using the computer-based service.

79. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprise instructions for modifying a degree of influence that the first active user has over another active user of the computer-based service.

80. The computer program of claim 47, further comprising instructions to:

(d) display information related to a current state of the first active user'"'"'s modified parameter.

81. The computer program of claim 80, in which the instructions for displaying information comprise instructions for updating a state of a graphical abstraction.

82. The computer program of claim 81, in which the graphical abstraction comprises a power bar.

83. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for determining the degree of influence comprise instructions for capping the degree of influence to a maximum amount.

84. The computer program of claim 83, in which the instructions for capping the degree of influence comprise instructions for applying a ceiling function.

85. The computer program of claim 83, in which the instructions for capping the degree of influence comprise instructions for applying a time-out function.

86. The computer program of claim 83, in which the instructions for capping the degree of influence comprise instructions for applying a function based on an elapsed time since an occurrence of an action engaged in by the first active user that caused the at least one other active user to provide input.

87. The computer program of claim 83, in which the instructions for capping the degree of influence comprise instructions for applying a temporally based function.

88. The computer program of claim 83, in which the instructions for capping the degree of influence comprise instructions for applying a quantitatively based function.

89. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for determining the degree of influence comprise instructions for considering an interpersonal context between the first active user and the at least one other active user.

90. The computer program of claim 89, in which the instructions for considering the interpersonal context comprise instructions for applying a function based on an ordering of events during an interaction of the first active user and the at least one other active user.

91. The computer program of claim 47, in which the instructions for modifying a parameter associated with the first active user comprise instructions for temporarily limiting the first active user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service if the input received from the at least one other active user constitutes a first occurrence of input about the first active user.

92. The computer program of claim 91, in which the temporary limitation on the first active user'"'"'s ability to use the computer-based service comprises a short-term limitation.