Cardiac pacing using adjustable atrio-ventricular delays

• US 6,360,127 B1
• Filed: 01/20/2000
• Issued: 03/19/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 05/08/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated (Boston Scientific Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Cardiac Pacemakers Incorporated (Boston Scientific Corporation)
• Inventors: Yu, Yinghong, Ding, Jiang, Kramer, Andrew P., Spinelli, Julio
• Primary Examiner(s): EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT
• Application Number:
  US09/492,911
• Time in Patent Office: 789 Days
• Field of Search: 607/23, 607/24, 607/9
• US Class Current: 607/23
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/3627 for treating a mechanical deficiency of the heart, e.g. congestive heart failure or cardiomyopathy
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 1/3682 with a variable atrioventricular delay
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 17/01 Risers

Abstract

A pacing system for providing optimal hemodynamic cardiac function for parameters such as contractility (peak left ventricle pressure change during systole or LV+dp/dt), or stroke volume (aortic pulse pressure) using system for calculating atrio-ventricular delays for optimal timing of a ventricular pacing pulse. The system providing an option for near optimal pacing of multiple hemodynamic parameters. The system deriving the proper timing using electrical or mechanical events having a predictable relationship with an optimal ventricular pacing timing signal.

Claims

1. A method, comprising:

sensing an atrial electrical event P;

monitoring a signal representing ventricular mechanical activity;

determining a ventricular mechanical event, Y, from the signal;

determining a time interval, PY, between P and Y;

determining an atrio-ventricular delay time interval (AVDc) approximately optimize maximizing ventricular pressure change (LV+dp/dt) with the time interval, PY; and

delivering a pacing pulse using the atrio-ventricular delay approximately optimized for maximizing ventricular pressure change.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the ventricular mechanical event includes measuring a slope of ventricular pressure.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the ventricular mechanical event includes identifying the ventricular mechanical event is relatively constant when the event has a standard deviation which is the lesser of 20 ms or 25% of a population mean.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein delivering the pacing pulse incudes delivering a ventricular pacing pulse with the atrio-ventricular delay time interval (AVDc) which is approximately optimized to provide a maximum increase in LV+dp/dt using the time interval, PY.

5. The method of claim 4, including:

determining a model which approximates the optimal atrio-ventricular delay (AVD), where the model provides an estimated AVDc based on PY; and

delivering a ventricular pacing pulse to a next patient to maximize the LV+dp/dt using the estimated AVDc.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein determining the model includes:

experimentally determining the time interval, PY, and the optimal atrio-ventricular delay (AVD);

performing a linear regression between the time interval, PY, and the optimal atrio-ventricular delay (AVD) determined experimentally; and

wherein delivering the ventricular pacing pulse includes delivering the pacing pulse using the estimated AVDc which is provided by M1(PY)−

M2, wherein M1, and M2 are coefficients of the linear regression.

7. The method of claim 6, wherein M1 is 0.96 and M2 is 139 milliseconds.

8. The method of claim 6, wherein sensing the atrial electrical event, P, includes using a right atrial sensing marker, wherein determining the ventricular mechanical event, Y, includes sensing intrinsic LV pressure developement that corresponds to the beginning of LV systole, and wherein delivering the ventricular pacing pulse includes delivering the pacing pulse to a left ventricle, and including measuring the time interval PY from the right atrial sensing market to the beginning of intrinsic LV pressure developement, wherein M1 is approximately kk, M2 is approximately qq milliseconds, and the best line fit for the estimated AVDc is kkPY−

qq.

9. The method of claim 5, wherein determining the model includes:

experimentally determining the time interval, PY, and the optional atrio-ventricular delay (AVD);

measuring the time difference, denoted as n, in milliseconds, between the time interval PY and the optimal atrio-ventricular (AVD) determined expermentally;

averaging the time difference n over a patient population; and

wherein delivering the ventricular pacing pulse includes delivering the pacing pulse using the estimated AVDc which is provided by PY−

na, wherein na is the mean of the time difference n.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein na=150 milliseconds.

11. The method of claim 9, wherein sensing the atrial electrical event, P, includes using a right atrial sensing marker, wherein determining the ventricular mechanical event, Y, includes sensing intrinsic LV pressure developement that corresponds to the beginning of LV systole, and wherein delivering the ventricular pacing pulse includes delivering the pacing pulse to a left ventrical, and includes measuring the time interval PY from the right atrial sensing marker to the beginning of intrinsic LV pressure developement, wherein na is approximately kk milliseconds, and the estimated AVDc is PY−

kk.