Candidate chaser

• US 6,381,592 B1
• Filed: 12/03/1997
• Issued: 04/30/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 12/03/1997
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Stephen Michael Reuning
• Original Assignee: Stephen Michael Reuning
• Inventors: Reuning, Stephen Michael
• Primary Examiner(s): RIMELL, SAMUEL G
• Assistant Examiner(s): Jeanty, Romain
• Application Number:
  US08/984,650
• Time in Patent Office: 1,609 Days
• Field of Search: 705/1, 705/7, 705/8, 705/9, 707/3, 707/10, 707/104, 709/206, 709/50
• US Class Current: 1/1
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/06 Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/10 Office automation; Time management
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/1053 Employment or hiring
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99933 Query processing, i.e. searching
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 707/99945 Object-oriented database structure processing

Abstract

The Candidate Chaser machine and method automatically locates Internet site pages and web postings which contain operator specified keywords or Boolean combinations and then extracts all electronic mail addresses from those pages as well as hyper-linked pages to as many linking levels as selected by the operator and then sends a job opportunity description in the form of an electronic mail message to each of the extracted addresses then receives responses from recipients of the job opportunity message then filters those messages by reading their text and forwards only desired responses to the candidate seeking client'"'"'s electronic mail address thusly sparing the client interaction with large amounts of irrelevant response while presenting viable candidates for a given job opening. It applies a distinctive and non-obvious method for delivering identical electronic mail messages to a group of targeted potential job candidates sharing a specifically desired single or set of common experiences, interests, capabilities, professional titles or talents relating to the needs of the candidate seeking hiring entity and handling their response.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method comprising—

performing the following steps in the following sequence;

a. searching the Internet

b. locating an Internet page or web posting,

c. reading at least a part of the text of said Internet page or web posting

d. comparing said text against at least one user defined criteria for an individual with specifically defined professional qualifications,

e. sorting said Internet page or web posting according to the presence or absence of said user defined criteria and for Internet site pages or web postings meeting said user defined criteria, electronically extracting from said Internet site page or web posting an e-mail address, and

f. sending to said extracted e-mail address an electronic mail message.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein said reading comprises reading substantially all of said text.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step is performed by comparing said text to an operator specified keyword or Boolean combination.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein said comparing step is performed using a rules based technology (such as natural language screening).

5. The method of claim 1, wherein said user defined criteria for an individual with specifically defined professional qualifications, comprises at least one rule to identify whether said text comprises a resume for a potentially appropriate candidate.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein said user defined criteria for an individual with specifically defined professional qualifications, comprise previous candidate search results.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein said sorting comprises calculating a “

score”

for said Internet page or web posting and ranking said Internet page or web posting by said score.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein said user defined criteria for an individual with specifically defined professional qualifications, comprises at least one rule to identify whether said text comprises a resume for a potentially appropriate candidate;

and wherein said sorting comprises calculating a “

score”

for said Internet page or web posting and ranking said Internet page or web posting by said score.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein said sorting generates a score for said Internet page or web posting, said score enabling said Internet page or web posting to be ranked by score;

and wherein said sending is done only if said score satisfies a threshold value.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein said electronic mail message comprises information on the potential availability of a job opportunity.

11. The method of claim 1, wherein said method is made available to a customer on a subscription basis for direct access by said customer over the Internet via a standard Web browser.

12. The method of claim 11, further comprising:

g. receiving at least one response to said electronic mail message.

13. The method of claim 12, further comprising:

h. analyzing said response according to at least one user defined relevancy criteria to identify whether said response is desirable.

14. The method of claim 13, further comprising:

i. forwarding said response to a client.

15. The method of claim 14, wherein said response is forwarded to said client only if said response meets said relevancy criteria.