Adjacent channel interference reduction in a FM receiver

• US 6,389,273 B1
• Filed: 08/23/1999
• Issued: 05/14/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 08/23/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Gula Consulting Limited Liability Company (Intellectual Ventures LLC)
• Original Assignee: Delphi Technologies, Inc. (BorgWarner Incorporated)
• Inventors: Brandenburg, Todd Matthew
• Primary Examiner(s): Bost, Dwayne
• Assistant Examiner(s): Green, Miguel D.
• Application Number:
  US09/379,231
• Time in Patent Office: 995 Days
• Field of Search: 455/192.1, 455/192.3, 455/196.1, 455/212, 455/254, 455/266, 455/283, 455/289, 455/295, 455/296, 455/313, 455/62, 455/63, 455/77, 455/450, 455/452, 455/65, 455/503, 455/67.1, 455/67.3, 455/501
• US Class Current: 455/296
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 1/1036 with automatic suppression of narrow band noise or interference, e.g. by using tuneable notch filters H04B1/123 takes precedence; filter circuits H03H

Abstract

A processor controlled FM receiver implements a technique for reducing adjacent channel interference without requiring additional components. Initially, the technique determines whether a desired channel has interference. If so, signal information on adjacent channels is collected. The desired channel is then shifted away from one of the adjacent channels if the collected signal information indicates that only one of the adjacent channels is appreciably interfering with the desired channel.

Claims

1. A method for reducing adjacent channel interference in a processor controlled FM receiver, comprising the steps of:

(a) collecting signal information on a desired channel and determining if the desired channel has undesirable interference;

(b) switching from the desired channel to an adjacent channel when the desired channel has undesirable interference, otherwise remaining tuned to the desired channel;

(c) determining a signal level of the adjacent channel; and

(d) shifting the desired channel away from the adjacent channel if the signal level of the adjacent channel indicates the adjacent channel is interfering with the desired channel.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjacent channel is a lower adjacent channel.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjacent channel is an upper adjacent channel.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjacent channel includes both an upper and a lower adjacent channel.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the desired channel is only shifted away from the adjacent channel if another adjacent channel causes less interference with the desired channel.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the collected signal information includes a signal level and an ultrasonic noise (USN) level.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the collected signal information includes an ultrasonic noise (USN) level.

8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the steps of:

(e) collecting additional signal information on the desired channel to determine if the undesirable interference is less after the shift; and

(f) shifting the desired channel back to its original position if the undesirable interference is not less after the shift.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of:

(g) switching back to the desired channel in about 7 ms or less, wherein the signal information is collected such that a user of the system cannot audibly discern that the switch occurred.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein the desired channel is shifted away from the interfering adjacent channel by about 25 kHz.

11. A tuning system for reducing adjacent channel interference in an FM receiver, comprising:

a tuner;

a processor coupled to the tuner;

a memory coupled to the processor, the memory storing data and instructions; and

tuning code located in the memory for causing the processor to perform the steps of;

(a) collecting signal information on a desired channel and determining whether the desired channel has undesirable interference;

(b) switching the tuner from the desired channel to an adjacent channel when the desired channel has undesirable interference, otherwise remaining tuned to the desired channel;

(c) determining a signal level of the adjacent channel; and

(d) shifting the desired channel away from the adjacent channel if the signal level of the adjacent channel indicates the adjacent channel is interfering with the desired channel.

12. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the adjacent channel is a lower adjacent channel.

13. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the adjacent channel is an upper adjacent channel.

14. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the adjacent channel includes both an upper and a lower adjacent channel.

15. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the desired channel is only shifted away from the adjacent channel if another adjacent channel causes less interference with the desired channel.

16. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the collected signal information includes a signal level and an ultrasonic noise (USN) level.

17. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the collected signal information includes an ultrasonic noise (USN) level.

18. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the tuning code causes the processor to perform the additional steps of:

(e) collecting additional signal information on the desired channel to determine if the interference level is less after the shift; and

(f) shifting the desired channel back to its original position if the interference level is not less after the shift.

19. The tuning system of claim 11, further comprising the step of:

(g) switching back to the desired channel in about 7 ms or less, wherein the signal information is collected such that a user of the system cannot audibly discern that the switch occurred.

20. The tuning system of claim 11, wherein the desired channel is shifted away from the adjacent channel by about 25 kHz.