Zero speed indicating devices and process of testing same

• US 6,389,875 B1
• Filed: 10/02/1998
• Issued: 05/21/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 10/02/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Triodyne Safety Systems, LLC
• Original Assignee: Triodyne, Inc.
• Inventors: Barnett, Ralph L., Liber, Theodore
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron
• Assistant Examiner(s): FAYYAZ, NASHMIYA SAQIB
• Application Number:
  US09/165,717
• Time in Patent Office: 1,327 Days
• Field of Search: 73/13.7, 73/13.8, 73/13.9, 73/14.1, 73/18.8, 340/648
• US Class Current: 73/1.37
• CPC Class Codes: F16P 3/08 in connection with the locking of doors, covers, guards, or like members giving access to moving machine parts
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 13/00 Indicating or recording presence, absence, or direction, of movement electric switches H01H; counting moving objects G06M7/00
• CPC Class Codes: G01P 21/02 of speedometers
• CPC Class Codes: Y10S 292/65 Emergency or safety
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 70/5341 Key operable only
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 70/8027 Condition indicators
• CPC Class Codes: Y10T 74/111 Speed controlled

Abstract

The subject invention is directed to methods, processes and decisions on test outcomes for testing for faulty, therefor dangerous, performance of zero speed indicators that are used to control the opening of barriers guarding moving machine components. The indicators may be tested by removing them from the components during operation without shutting down production or in certain situations the indicators may be tested during the run down phase of the components caused by machine stop initiations. The tests allow to anticipate and hence prevent hazardous opening of barriers due to a faulty zero speed indication. Additionally, the invention is directed to testing of the insertion of motion interference devices in conjunction with zero speed indicators, both of which must perform correctly in order to permit the unlocking and opening of the protective barrier. There are included various exemplary devices for effecting the testing function.

Claims

1. The method of testing a zero speed indicator for a run down component of a machine while the machine is running under power consisting of the step of isolating the indicator from the machine and testing the zero speed indicating accuracy of the indicator.

3. The method as set forth in claim 1 including the step of decelerating the movement of the indicators rundown component during testing to reduce the testing time.

9. The method as set forth in claim 1, 2, 4, or 5 in which the indicator controls the opening of a guard including the steps of recording and indicating that the indicator did or did not properly indicate zero speed, and if it did not properly indicate zero speed the guard should remain locked and should not be allowed to be opened and to schedule necessary repair or replacement, and if the indicator properly functions to record and indicate that the indicator passed the zero speed indicating test.

10. The method as set forth in claim 9 including the steps of activating suitable warning indicators and devices if the zero speed indicator failed the speed indicating test and schedule necessary repair and/or replacement of the failed indicator or then either postpone the repair or replacement for a later suitable time without shutting down the machine or shut down the machine due to test failures to perform the necessary repair and/or replacement of the failed indicator.

11. The method as set forth in claim 10 including the step of unlatching the guard when the machine is shut down so that repair or replacement of the failed indicator can take place.

2. The method of testing a zero speed indicator for a run down component of a machine while the machine is still running consisting of the step of uncoupling the component from the machine and testing the zero speed indicating accuracy of the indicator.

4. The method of testing for zero speed indicating accuracy a zero speed indicator for a machine having intermittent motion wherein the machine is operated between a stop and start mode consisting of the step of testing the zero speed indicator while the machine is in a run down phase during the stopping mode thus testing the indicator without interrupting the operation or production capability of the machine.

5. Apparatus for testing for zero speed indicating accuracy of a zero speed indicator for moving components of a machine consisting of a motion detector connected to the moving components and moving at a speed proportional to that of the moving components, means for detaching the motion detector from the moving components, and means for testing the motion detector for zero speed indicating accuracy to determine the detector is performing correctly.

6. Apparatus as set forth in claim 5 in which the means for detaching the motion detector from the machine components consists of a declutching device.

8. Apparatus as set forth in claim 6 or 7 in which there is a braking device included to reduce the testing time.

7. Apparatus for testing for zero speed indicating accuracy of a zero speed indicator for moving components of a machine consisting of a motion detector assembly including a motion detector and a run down component moving at a speed proportional to that of the moving components, means for detaching the run down component from the moving components and means for testing the motion detector for zero speed indicating accuracy to determine if the detector is performing correctly.

12. The method of testing a zero speed indicator while a machine is running consisting of applying a suitable testing device to the indicator, uncoupling the indicator from the machine, permitting the indicator to run down and testing to see if the indicator uncoupled and if it did not uncouple the indicator will indicate that the indicator cannot be tested, a guard closure cannot be unlocked and necessary repair or replacement will be scheduled and if the indicator did uncouple then test the indicator to see if the indicator correctly determines and indicates zero speed during the run down phase.

13. The method as set forth in claim 12 in which after the indicator has passed all the indicator tests the indicator is recoupled and if recoupling occurs the indicator will so indicate and if the indicator failed to recouple this will be so indicated and the necessary repair or replacement will be scheduled.

15. The method as set forth in claim 12, 13, or 14 including the steps of activating suitable warning indicators and devices if the indicator failed to accurately indicate machine speed and then either postpone the repair or replacement for the later suitable time without shutting down the machine or shut down the machine due to test failures to perform the necessary repair and/or replacement of the failed indicator.

16. The method as set forth in claim 12 or 13 in which the testing of the indicator includes determining if any assigned monitoring times have been exceeded and if so the guard remains locked and then indicate that the test failed and the guard closure is not to be unlocked and the necessary repair or replacement will be scheduled.

14. The method of testing a zero speed indicator for a machine during the speed run down phases of the machine including those caused by machine stop initiations including the step of activating the zero speed indicator and applying a suitable testing device to the indicator to test the indicator and if the indicator fails the test any guard closure controlled by the indicator remains locked, the testing device is removed from the indicator and the necessary repair or replacement will be scheduled, and if the indicator is operating accurately the testing device is removed from the indicator.