Method of modeling a neighbor list for a mobile unit in a CDMA cellular telephone system

• US 6,411,819 B1
• Filed: 11/19/1998
• Issued: 06/25/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 11/19/1998
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Allen Telecom LLC (CommScope Holding Company, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Scoreboard Inc. (CommScope Holding Company, Inc.)
• Inventors: Gutowski, Stanley J.
• Primary Examiner(s): Maung, Nay
• Assistant Examiner(s): GELIN, JEAN ALLAND
• Application Number:
  US09/196,022
• Time in Patent Office: 1,314 Days
• Field of Search: 455/436, 455/437, 455/439, 455/442, 455/447, 455/450, 455/69, 455/62, 455/522, 455/63, 455/524, 455/67.3, 455/525, 455/512, 455/446, 370/331, 370/332, 370/334, 370/335, 370/338, 370/311, 370/329, 370/252, 370/342, 370/441, 375/130
• US Class Current: 455/525
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 16/18 Network planning tools

Abstract

A computer implemented process which determines those base stations which most probably communicate with a mobile unit, determines a probability for each base station to communicate with a mobile unit at a location based on the actual received signal level compared to the interference level of signals received at the location, then computes for each set of base stations a probability of that set of base stations communicating.

Claims

1. A process for selecting a neighbor list in a CDMA system comprising the steps of:

determining a set of base stations consisting of all base stations able to communicate with a mobile unit at a location based on received signal power level from the base station compared to a power level of all signals received at the location,

determining a probability of communication at said location for each base station within said set of base stations able to communicate with a mobile unit at a location,

identifying each possible combination of one or more base stations from said set of base,

computing a probability of communication at said location for each said possible combination of base stations based upon said probability of communication for each of said base stations in said combination determined in light of the probability of communication of the remainder of said base stations in said set, and

compiling from said computed probabilities of said combinations, a neighbor list for each base station indicating the relative probability of each base station serving a location relative to each neighbors on the list.

2. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining a probability of communication for each base station able to communicate with a mobile unit at a location comprises determining a ratio of received signal power level from the base station to total interference at the location.

3. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining a probability of communication for each base station able to communicate with a mobile unit at a location comprises comparing a ratio of received signal power level from the base station to total interference at the location with a curve comparing the ratio to a probability of receipt of signals.

4. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining a probability of communication for each base station able to communicate with a mobile unit at a location comprises selecting a neighbor list for each base station from the most probable of the base stations and groups.

5. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of computing a probability of communication of each possible combination of base stations combination is based on actual power level of each base station in the set as compared to the interference level of signals received at a location.

6. A process as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of computing a probability of communication of each possible combination of base stations in a set of all base stations able to communicate with a mobile unit at the location includes summing probabilities for a serving base station together with any other serving base station throughout the system.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6 in which a sum of probabilities depends on a number of locations mutually served by a base station and any other base station throughout the system.

8. A method as claimed in claim 6 in which a sum of probabilities depends on an average number of users at each location mutually served by a base station and any other base station throughout the system.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7 including the further step of determining a neighbor list for a first base station from base stations which serve more than a single location in common with said said first base station, wherein said number of commonly served is greater than a threshold number of mutually served locations.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9 in which the step of determining a neighbor list for a first base station a predetermined number of base stations with a greatest number of mutually served locations.

11. A method as claimed in claim 9 in which the step of determining a neighbor list for said first base station includes selecting a predetermined number of base stations with a greatest number of mutually served users.

12. A method as claimed in claim 7 including the further step of determining a neighbor list for a first base station from base stations which serve more than a single location in common with said first base station, wherein said number of commonly served is greater than a threshold number of mutually served users.

13. A method as claimed in claim 1 in which the step of determining said set of all base stations able to communicate with a mobile unit at a location, includes the steps of:

calculating interference at each location from signal levels received at the location,

determining necessary received signal level at each location for a quality signal,

computing a new transmit power for each of said base stations to produce a necessary received signal level,

determining new signal levels through measurement or modeling based upon said new transmit powers and

repeating the steps until a change in interference is less than a predetermined amount.

14. A method as claimed in claim 13 in which the step of computing transmit power for base stations to produce necessary received signal level utilizes the probability of a base station serving a location weighted by an average number of users at a location.

15. A method as claimed in claim 13 in which the step of computing transmit power for base stations to produce necessary received signal level sums average transmit levels for a base station to serve a number of locations to determine a total average transmit level for a base station.

16. A method as claimed in claim 13 in which the step of calculating interference at each location from measured signal levels received at the location includes the steps of:

summing received signal levels for each group of base stations serving a location,

weighting a resulting sum by a probability of the group of base stations serving the location, and

summing a resulting value for each group of base stations serving a location to produce an average interference level at a location.

17. A process as claimed in claim 13 in which the step of computing transmit power for base stations to produce necessary received signal level includes:

utilizing the probability of a base station serving a location weighted by an average number of users at a location to determine a transmit level for a base station for each location in the system,

comparing a difference in sector transmit power between two successive iterations and determine convergence when the difference falls below a specified threshold.