Fault localization and health indication for a controller area network

• US 6,442,708 B1
• Filed: 12/14/1999
• Issued: 08/27/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 12/14/1999
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Dierauer, Peter P., Dierauer, Isabelle
• Primary Examiner(s): Ton, David
• Application Number:
  US09/461,662
• Time in Patent Office: 987 Days
• Field of Search: 714/25, 714/30, 714/26, 714/712, 714/716, 714/713, 714/704, 714/821, 714/45, 455/456
• US Class Current: 714/25
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0677 Localisation of faults

Abstract

A node of a network comprises an error message detector arranged to detect error messages transmitted over the network, a counter arranged to count the error messages in order to produce an error message count, and a controller arranged to count valid messages in order to produce a count of valid messages. The controller is arranged to compare the error message count to the valid message count to indicate the health of the network. The node further comprises a transceiver, a controller coupled to the transceiver by a receive line and a transmit line, and error message first logic coupled to the receive and transmit lines. The error message first logic is arranged to detect a first error message from the receive line and a second error message from the transmit line, and to determine whether the node is closest to a fault by comparing timing between the first error message and the second error message.

Claims

1. A method of determining a location of a fault comprising the following steps:

a) detecting a first error message from a receive line of a node;

b) detecting a second error message from a transmit line of the node;

c) if the first error message is detected before the second error message, determining that the node did not first transmit the second error message; and

,

d) if the second error message is detected before the first error message, determining that the node may have first transmitted the second error message.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein step d) comprises the following steps:

d1) determining a time difference between the first and second error messages; and

,

d2) determining that the node did first transmit the second error message if the time difference is greater than a transceiver delay.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein step d) comprises the following steps:

d1) determining a time difference between the first and second error messages; and

,

d2) determining that the node did not first transmit the second error message if the time difference is less than a transceiver delay.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein step d) further comprises the following step:

d3) determining that the node did first transmit the second error message if the time difference is greater than the transceiver delay.

5. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of transmitting a message indicating first detection of a fault.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of counting a number of times that the node did first transmit the second error message.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein step d) comprises the following steps:

d1) determining a time difference between the first and second error messages; and

,

d2) determining that the node did first transmit the second error message if the time difference is greater than a transceiver delay.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein step d) comprises the following steps:

d1) determining a time difference between the first and second error messages; and

,

d2) determining that the node did not first transmit the second error message if the time difference is less than a transceiver delay.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein step d) further comprises the following step:

d3) determining that the node did first transmit the second error message if the time difference is greater than the transceiver delay.

10. The method of claim 6 further comprising the step of transmitting a message indicating the number.

11. A node comprising:

a transceiver coupled to a communication line;

a controller coupled to the transceiver by a receive line and a transmit line; and

,

error message first logic coupled to the receive and transmit lines, wherein the error message first logic is arranged to detect a first error message from the receive line and a second error message from the transmit line, and wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine whether the node is closest to a fault by comparing timing between the first error message and the second error message.

12. The node of claim 11 wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine that the node is closest to the fault by determining a time difference between the first and second error messages and by determining that the node transmitted the second error message first if the time difference is greater than a transceiver delay.

13. The node of claim 11 wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine that the node is not closest to the fault by determining a time difference between the first and second error messages and by determining that the node did not transmit the second error message first if the time difference is less than a transceiver delay.

14. The node of claim 11 wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine that the node is not closest to the fault by determining that the node received the first error message before it transmitted the second error message.

15. The node of claim 11 wherein the transceiver is arranged to transmit a message indicating first detection of the fault.

16. The node of claim 11 further comprising a counter arranged to count a number of times that the node did determine that it is closest to the fault.

17. The node of claim 16 wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine that the node is closest to the fault by determining a time difference between the first and second error messages and by determining that the node transmitted the second error message first if the time difference is greater than a transceiver delay.

18. The node of claim 16 wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine that the node is not closest to the fault by determining a time difference between the first and second error messages and by determining that the node did not transmit the second error message first if the time difference is less than a transceiver delay.

19. The node of claim 16 wherein the error message first logic is arranged to determine that the node is not closest to the fault by determining that the node received the first error message before it transmitted the second error message.

20. The node of claim 16 wherein the transceiver is arranged to transmit a message indicating the number.

21. The node of claim 16 wherein the error message first logic and the counter are part of the controller.

22. The node of claim 11 wherein the error message first logic is part of the controller.