Method for optimizing forward link coverage in code division multiple access (CDMA) network

• US 6,456,652 B1
• Filed: 03/29/1999
• Issued: 09/24/2002
• Est. Priority Date: 03/28/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Original Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
• Inventors: Kim, Gun-yeob, Wee, Pyeong-hwan
• Primary Examiner(s): Vo, Don N.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Nguyen, Dung X.
• Application Number:
  US09/281,140
• Time in Patent Office: 1,275 Days
• Field of Search: 375/130, 375/224, 375/227, 375/140, 375/141, 375/259, 370/335, 370/331, 370/441, 455/436, 455/423, 455/424, 455/439, 455/446, 455/67.4
• US Class Current: 375/224
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 24/06 Testing, supervising or monitoring using simulated traffic
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/20 using error rate
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 52/24 using SIR [Signal to Interference Ratio] or other wireless path parameters

Abstract

Disclosed is a method for optimizing forward link coverage in a spread spectrum communication system, e.g., CDMA system. Spread spectrum test communication signals are transmitted from a base station at a known power level, using an antenna having a known beam direction. Orthogonal channel noise is simulated in order to model noise generated by wireless communication traffic existing in an operational communication system of many subscribers. A mobile station receives the test communication signals in a specific region of a cell, and measures signal quality parameters, e.g., RSSI, Ec/Io and a forward frame error rate (FFER), from the received signals and simulated noise. The measured signal quality parameters are compared to respective criteria. Each region is designating as being satisfactorily covered by the base station if the measured signal quality parameters substantially satisfy the criteria. Otherwise, base station equipment is adjusted to modify the transmission of the test communication signals, and the process is repeated.

Claims

1. A method for optimizing forward link coverage in a code division multiple access (CDMA) network comprising the steps of:

a) determining the morphology of a forward link coverage area;

b) determining azimuth orientation, tilt, gain and type of a base station antenna;

c) calculating power rating per channel for said coverage area;

d) determining RF output power per frequency assignment per sector for said coverage area;

e) simulating orthogonal channel noise which models noise generated by wireless communication traffic in an operational communication system of many subscribers;

f) establishing forward power control parameters;

g) performing a field-drive-test in which a mobile station receives test communication signals transmitted from said base station within specific regions of said coverage area, said mobile station measuring values for a received signal strength indicator (RSSI), a ratio (E_C/I_O) of pilot chip energy to total power spectral density, and a forward frame error rate (FFER);

h) comparing the measured RSSI value to a first threshold;

i) comparing said measured ratio (E_C/I_O) to a second threshold;

j) comparing said measured FFER to a third threshold;

k) determining if chip delay measured at the mobile station exceeds a fourth threshold, and if so, making adjustments to base station equipment to attempt to reduce said chip delay;

l) determining whether a shade area exists by comparing said RSSI, E_C/I_O, FFER with a basis of overall network design;

m) determining whether transmit/receive links are balanced; and

n) designating forward link coverage as being satisfied when comparisons to said first, second and third thresholds are favorable and the transmit/receive links are balanced;

otherwise, making adjustments to base station equipment to attempt to correct unfavorable comparisons to said thresholds and to correct an imbalance between the transmit/receive links.

2. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein a maximum path loss is estimated by selecting a path loss model to be used as the basis of network design, said maximum path loss being dependent upon the determined morphology.

3. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said azimuth, tilt, gain and type of antenna are determined by considering neighboring cells of the corresponding area and an amount of communication traffic in said step (b).

4. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein traffic channel coverage satisfies a condition:

Pilot_Coverage=TrafficChannel_Coverage in said step (c).

5. The method as set forth in claim 4, wherein sync channel coverage satisfies a condition Pilot—

Coverage<

=SyncChannel—

Coverage in said step (c).

6. The method as set forth in claim 5, wherein paging channel coverage satisfies a condition Pilot_Coverage<

=PagingChannel_Coverage in said step (c).

7. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said forward power control parameters include the values, Nominal_Gain, Max_Tx_Gain, FER_Threshold, Big_Up_Delta, Small_Up_Delta in said step of establishing forward power control parameters.

8. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein a unit data is established as a coverage area when the number of data satisfying the basis of service coverage becomes 95% or more among the measured data within the unit area to convert the specific vehicle data to an area in said step of performing field-drive-test and analyzing the result of said field-drive-test.

9. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the tilt and azimuth orientation of the antenna are adjusted if said measured RSSI is below said first threshold.

10. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein an Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of the base station is adjusted using a variable attenuator if said measured RSSI is below said first threshold.

11. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the maximum among the forward power control parameters is adjusted if said RSSI is below said first threshold.

12. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the tilt and azimuth of said base station antenna are adjusted if said measured E_C/IO is below said second threshold.

13. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the output of at least one neighboring base station and the tilt and azimuth of an associated neighboring base station antenna are adjusted if said measured E_C/I_O is below said second threshold.

14. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein an Effective Radiated Power (ERP) of said base station is adjusted using a variable attenuator if said measured FFER is higher than said third threshold.

15. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein noise sources are resolved by measuring noise floor over the forward link if said measured FFER is higher than said third threshold.

16. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein the values of Up, Down, Max and Min among said forward power control parameters are adjusted if said measured FFER is higher than said third threshold.

17. The method as set forth in claim 1, wherein said adjustments to base station equipment of step (k) include adjustments to tilt and azimuth orientation of said base station antenna.