Method for simulating drilling of roller cone bits and its application to roller cone bit design and performance

• US 6,516,293 B1
• Filed: 03/13/2000
• Issued: 02/04/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 03/13/2000
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Smith International Incorporated (SLB)
• Original Assignee: Smith International Incorporated (SLB)
• Inventors: Huang, Sujian, Cawthorne, Chris E.
• Primary Examiner(s): FREJD, RUSSELL WARREN
• Application Number:
  US09/524,088
• Time in Patent Office: 1,058 Days
• Field of Search: 703/7, 703/10, 702/6, 702/9, 702/11, 382/109, 345/711, 340/853.1, 340/853.3, 340/853.6, 175/331, 175/339, 175/377, 175/57, 731/520.2, 731/524.7
• US Class Current: 703/10
• CPC Class Codes: E21B 10/16 characterised by tooth form or arrangement

Abstract

A method for simulating the drilling performance of a roller cone bit drilling an earth formation may be used to generate a visual representation of drilling, to design roller cone drill bits, and to optimize the drilling performance of a roller cone bit. The method for generating a visual representation of a roller cone bit drilling earth formations includes selecting bit design parameters, selecting drilling parameters, and selecting an earth formation to be drilled. The method further includes calculating, from the bit design parameters, drilling parameters and earth formation, parameters of a crater formed when one of a plurality of cutting elements contacts the earth formation. The method further includes calculating a bottomhole geometry, wherein the crater is removed from a bottomhole surface. The method also includes incrementally rotating the bit and repeating the calculating of crater parameters and bottomhole geometry based on calculated roller cone rotation speed and geometrical location with respect to rotation of said roller cone drill bit about its axis. The method also includes converting the crater and bottomhole geometry parameters into a visual representation.

Claims

1. A method for generating a visual representation of a roller cone bit drilling in earth formations, comprising:

selecting bit design parameters, comprising at least a geometry of a cutting element on said bit;

selecting drilling parameters, comprising at least an axial force on said bit;

selecting an earth formation to be represented as drilled;

calculating from said selected drilling parameters, said selected bit design parameters and said earth formation, parameters for a crater formed when one of a plurality of said cutting elements contacts said earth formation;

calculating a bottomhole geometry, wherein said crater is removed from a bottomhole surface;

simulating incrementally rotating said bit, and repeating said calculating of said crater parameters and said bottomhole geometry based on calculated roller cone rotation speed and geometrical location with respect to rotation of said roller cone drill bit about its axis; and

converting said crater parameters and said bottomhole geometry parameters into said visual representation.

2. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said bit design parameters comprise cutting element and roller cone geometry forming part of a computer aided design file comprising design models of said bit.

3. The method as defined in claim 2, wherein said cutting element and roller cone geometry are converted to coordinates prior to entry into said method.

4. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said bit design parameters comprise at least one of cutting element count, cutting element height, cutting element geometrical shape, cutting element spacing, cutting element location, cutting element orientation, cone axis offset, cone diameter profile, and bit diameter.

5. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said drilling parameters comprise at least one of axial force on said bit and rotational speed of the bit.

6. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said calculated crater parameters are derived from laboratory tests comprising a cutting element having selected geometry being impressed on an earth formation sample with a selected force, said tests generating at least a correspondence between penetration depth of said cutting element into said formation and said selected force.

7. The method as defined in claim 6, wherein said selected force comprises an axial component.

8. The method as defined in claim 6, wherein said selected force comprises a lateral component.

9. The method as defined in claim 6, wherein said tests are conducted under selected confining pressure.

10. The method as defined in claim 6, wherein said laboratory tests are interpolated to enable selection of earth formations having properties and bit design parameters having values intermediate of ones used in said laboratory tests.

11. The method as defined in claim 6, wherein craters created in said laboratory tests are converted to coordinates describing a geometry thereof, and said coordinates are selected to define a cross-section, said cross-section forming a principal input for said calculated crater parameters.

12. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said calculated crater parameters are determined from numerical analysis of penetration of a cutting element having a known geometry impressed on a earth formation having known mechanical properties with a selected force.

13. The method as defined in claim 12, wherein said selected force comprises an axial component.

14. The method as defined in claim 12, wherein said selected force comprises a lateral component.

15. The method as defined in claim 12, wherein said numerical analysis comprises finite element analysis.

16. The method as defined in claim 12, wherein said numerical analysis comprises finite difference analysis.

17. The method as defined in claim 12, wherein said numerical analysis comprises boundary element analysis.

18. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein an axial movement corresponding to said incremental rotation of said bit is determined wherein a sum of axial forces on all of said plurality of cutting elements approximately equals said selected axial force on said bit.

19. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said visual representation comprises a graph representing axial force on one of said plurality of cutting elements.

20. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said visual representation comprises a graph representing axial force on a row of said plurality of cutting elements disposed on a roller cone on said bit.

21. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said visual representation comprises a graph representing axial force on one of a plurality of roller cones on said bit.

22. The method as defined in claim 1, wherein said visual representation comprises a graphic display of said bottomhole geometry.

23. A method for designing a roller cone drill bit, comprising:

selecting initial bit design parameters, comprising at least a geometry of a cutting element on said bit;

selecting drilling parameters, comprising at least an axial force on said bit;

selecting an earth formation to be represented as drilled;

calculating from said selected drilling parameters, said selected bit design parameters and said earth formation, parameters for a crater formed when one of a plurality of said cutting elements contacts said earth formation;

calculating a bottomhole geometry, wherein said crater is removed from a bottomhole surface;

simulating incrementally rotating said bit, and repeating said calculating of said crater parameters and said bottomhole geometry based on calculated roller cone rotation speed and geometrical location with respect to rotation of said roller cone drill bit about its axis; and

adjusting at least one of said initial bit design parameters, and repeating said calculating said crater parameters, said bottom hole geometry and said simulated incrementally rotating until an optimal set of said bit design parameters is obtained.

24. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said optimal set of bit design parameters is determined when lateral forces are substantially optimized to improve drilling performance.

25. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said optimal set of bit design parameters is determined when axial forces exerted by said cutting elements on each individual cone of said roller cone bit are substantially balanced.

26. The method as defined in claim 25, wherein lateral forces are substantially optimized to improve drilling performance.

27. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said optimal set of bit design parameters is determined when lateral forces exerted by said cutting elements on each individual cone of said roller cone bit are substantially balanced.

28. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said optimal set of bit design parameters is determined when maximum rate of penetration is attained for said selected axial force on said bit.

29. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said bit design parameters comprise cutting element and roller cone geometry forming part of a computer aided design file comprising design models of said bit.

30. The method as defined in claim 29, wherein said cutting element and roller cone geometry are converted to coordinates prior to entry into said method.

31. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said bit design parameters comprise at least one of cutting element count, cutting element height, cutting element geometrical shape, cutting element spacing, cutting element location, and cutting element orientation, cone axis offset, cone diameter profile, bit diameter.

32. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said drilling parameters comprise at least one of axial force on said bit and rotational speed of said bit.

33. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said calculated crater parameters are derived from laboratory tests comprising a cutting element having selected geometry being impressed on an earth formation sample with a selected force, said tests generating at least a correspondence between penetration depth of said cutting element into said formation and said selected force.

34. The method as defined in claim 33, wherein said selected force comprises an axial component.

35. The method as defined in claim 33, wherein said selected force comprises a lateral component.

36. The method as defined in claim 33, wherein said tests are conducted under selected confining pressure.

37. The method as defined in claim 33, wherein said laboratory tests are interpolated to enable selection of earth formations having properties and bit design parameters having values intermediate of ones used in said laboratory tests.

38. The method as defined in claim 33, wherein craters created in said laboratory tests are converted to coordinates describing a geometry thereof, and said coordinates are selected to define a cross-section, said cross-section forming a principal input for said calculated crater parameters.

39. The method as defined in claim 23, wherein said calculated crater parameters are determined from numerical analysis of penetration of a cutting element having a known geometry impressed on a earth formation having known mechanical properties with a selected force.

40. The method as defined in claim 39, wherein said selected force comprises an axial component.

41. The method as defined in claim 39, wherein said selected force comprises a lateral component.

42. The method as defined in claim 39, wherein said numerical analysis comprises finite element analysis.

43. The method as defined in claim 39, wherein said numerical analysis comprises finite difference analysis.

44. The method as defined in claim 39, wherein said numerical analysis comprises boundary element analysis.

45. The method as defined in claim 23 wherein an axial movement corresponding to said incremental rotation of said bit is determined wherein a sum of axial forces on all of said plurality of cutting elements approximately equals said selected axial force on said bit.

46. A method for optimizing drilling parameters of a roller cone drill bit drilling an earth formation, comprising:

selecting bit design parameters, comprising at least a geometry of a cutting element on said bit;

selecting initial drilling parameters, comprising at least an axial force on said bit;

selecting an earth formation to be represented as drilled;

calculating from said selected drilling parameters, said selected bit design parameters and said earth formation, parameters for a crater formed when one of a plurality of said cutting elements contacts said earth formation;

calculating a bottomhole geometry, wherein said crater is removed from a bottomhole surface;

simulating incrementally rotating said bit, and repeating said calculating of said crater parameters and said bottomhole geometry based on calculated roller cone rotation speed and geometrical location with respect to rotation of said roller cone drill bit about its axis; and

adjusting at least one of said initial drilling parameters, and repeating said calculating said crater parameters, said bottom hole geometry and said simulating incrementally rotating until an optimal set of said drilling parameters is obtained.

47. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein said optimal set of drilling parameters is determined when a rate of penetration is maximized.

48. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein said bit design parameters comprise cutting element and roller cone geometry forming part of a computer aided design file comprising design model of said bit.

49. The method as defined in claim 48, wherein said cutting element and roller cone geometry are converted to coordinates prior to entry into said method.

50. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein said bit design parameters comprise at least one of cutting element count, cutting element height, cutting element geometrical shape, cutting element spacing, cutting element location, and cutting element orientation, cone axis offset, cone diameter profile, bit diameter.

51. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein said drilling parameters comprise at least one of axial force on said bit and rotational speed of said bit.

52. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein said calculated crater parameters are derived from laboratory tests comprising a cutting element having selected geometry being impressed on an earth formation sample with a selected force, said tests generating at least a correspondence between penetration depth of said cutting element into said formation and said selected force.

53. The method as defined in claim 52, wherein said selected force comprises an axial component.

54. The method as defined in claim 52, wherein said selected force comprises a lateral component.

55. The method as defined in claim 52, wherein said tests are conducted under selected confining pressure.

56. The method as defined in claim 52, wherein said laboratory tests are interpolated to enable selection of earth formations having properties and bit design parameters having values intermediate of ones used in said laboratory tests.

57. The method as defined in claim 52, wherein craters created in said laboratory tests are converted to coordinates describing a geometry thereof, and said coordinates are selected to define a cross-section, said cross-section forming a principal input for said calculated crater parameters.

58. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein said calculated crater parameters are determined from numerical analysis of penetration of a cutting element having a known geometry impressed on a earth formation having known mechanical properties with a selected force.

59. The method as defined in claim 58, wherein said selected force comprises an axial component.

60. The method as defined in claim 58, wherein said selected force comprises a lateral component.

61. The method as defined in claim 58, wherein said numerical analysis comprises finite element analysis.

62. The method as defined in claim 58, wherein said numerical analysis comprises finite difference analysis.

63. The method as defined in claim 58, wherein said numerical analysis comprises boundary element analysis.

64. The method as defined in claim 46, wherein an axial movement corresponding to said incremental rotation of said bit is determined wherein a sum of axial forces on all of said plurality of cutting elements approximately equals said selected axial force on said bit.