Alkaline sorbent injection for mercury control

• US 6,528,030 B2
• Filed: 11/16/2001
• Issued: 03/04/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 12/07/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: McDermott Technology, Inc.
• Original Assignee: McDermott Technology, Inc.
• Inventors: Holmes, Michael J., Madden, Deborah A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Silverman, Stanley S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): MEDINA SANABRIA, MARIBEL
• Application Number:
  US09/993,230
• Publication Number:
  US 20020102189A1
• Time in Patent Office: 473 Days
• Field of Search: 423/243.08, 423/243.11, 423/244.07, 423/244.08, 423/210, 422/171, 422/172, 110/345
• US Class Current: 423/210
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 53/508 by treating the gases with solids
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 53/64 Heavy metals or compounds thereof, e.g. mercury
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 53/80 Semi-solid phase processes, i.e. by using slurries
• CPC Class Codes: B01D 53/81 Solid phase processes

Abstract

A mercury removal system for removing mercury from combustion flue gases is provided in which alkaline sorbents at generally extremely low stoichiometric molar ratios of alkaline earth or an alkali metal to sulfur of less than 1.0 are injected into a power plant system at one or more locations to remove at least between about 40% and 60% of the mercury content from combustion flue gases. Small amounts of alkaline sorbents are injected into the flue gas stream at a relatively low rate. A particulate filter is used to remove mercury-containing particles downstream of each injection point used in the power plant system.

Claims

1. A method for removing mercury from a boiler flue gas comprising:

providing in one of powdered and slurried form at least one sorbent selected from the group consisting of;

alkali metals, alkaline earth elements and combinations thereof, in a cumulative stoichiometric molar ratio of alkaline earth and alkali metal to sulfur of less than 1 mole alkaline earth and alkali metal/mole sulfur;

injecting the sorbent into a combustion system having a boiler and a stack at a point upstream of the stack so as to contact the sorbent with a flue gas containing mercury thereby capturing mercury in particulate form; and

removing the particulate mercury from the flue gas at a point upstream of the stack.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the injecting the sorbent occurs at a point within the combustion system where the flue gas has a temperature of less than 2000°

F.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the removing the particulate mercury from the flue gas includes passing the flue gas through an electrostatic precipitator after the sorbent has been injected into the combustion system.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the cumulative stoichiometric molar ratio of alkaline earth and alkali metal to sulfur is in the range of about 0.001 to 0.5 moles of alkaline earth and alkali metal/sulfur.

5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the sorbent is at least one selected from the group consisting of:

limestone, lime, a calcium-based sorbent, a sodium-based sorbent, and combinations thereof.

6. A method according to claim 2, wherein the removing the particulate mercury from the flue gas includes passing the flue gas through an electrostatic precipitator after the sorbent has been injection into the combustion system.

7. A method according to claim 2, wherein the cumulative stoichiometric molar ratio of alkaline earth and alkali metal to sulfur is in the range of about 0.001 to 0.5 moles of alkaline earth and alkali metal/sulfur.

8. A method according to claim 2, wherein the sorbent is at least one selected from the group consisting of:

limestone, lime, a calcium-based, a sodium-based sorbent, and combinations thereof.

9. A method according to claim 6, wherein the cumulative stoichiometric molar ratio of alkaline earth and alkali metal to sulfur is in the range of about 0.001 to 0.5 moles of alkaline earth and alkali metal/sulfur.

10. A method according to claim 9, wherein the sorbent is at least one selected from the group consisting of:

limestone, lime, a calcium-based sorbent, a sodium-based sorbent, and combinations thereof.

11. A method according to claim 6, wherein the sorbent is at least one selected from the group consisting of:

limestone, lime, a calcium-based sorbent, a sodium-based sorbent, and combinations thereof.