Glass-break detector and method of alarm discrimination

• US 6,538,570 B1
• Filed: 06/22/2000
• Issued: 03/25/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 05/07/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Ademco Inc. (Resideo Technologies, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Honeywell International Inc.
• Inventors: Smith, Richard A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Wu, Daniel J.
• Assistant Examiner(s): Huang, Sihong
• Application Number:
  US09/602,647
• Time in Patent Office: 1,006 Days
• Field of Search: 340/550, 340/566, 340/541, 340/540, 340/544
• US Class Current: 340/550
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/04 by breaking of glass
• CPC Class Codes: G08B 13/1672 using sonic detecting means, e.g. a microphone operating in the audio frequency range

Abstract

A glass-breakage detector that provides improved immunity to false triggering when detecting the breakage of a glass window, or similar structure, as sensed by an acoustic transducer. The detector employs a validation method which improves discrimination of commonly known false alarm signals, such as glass flexing. Signals from an acoustic transducer are amplified, conditioned, and measured within three signal processing sections which process the signals at low-frequencies, medium-frequencies, and high-frequencies according to methods highly selective to breakage events. The detector provides an alarm output upon validating a detected breakage event.

Claims

1. An apparatus for detecting the breaking of a contact-sensitive surface, comprising:

(a) an acoustic transducer;

(b) a detector circuit responsive to the transducer for detecting an acoustic wave resulting from a contact force applied to the surface and generating a signal representing said acoustic wave, said signal having a plurality of consecutive amplitude peaks of the same or opposite phases; and

(c) means for

(i) scaling the amplitude of a first peak by a scaling factor less than one to establish a threshold level;

(ii) comparing the amplitude of a amplitude peak following said first peak to the threshold level; and

(iii) disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the second peak is greater than the threshold level and the second peak occurs within a time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

2. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, further comprising means for

(a) comparing the amplitude of a third peak following the second peak with the amplitude of the first peak;

(b) comparing the amplitude of a fourth peak following the third peak with the threshold level; and

(c) disqualifying said contact force as a glass break if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within a second time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

3. An apparatus as recited in claim 2, further comprising means for comparing the amplitude of the first peak with a second threshold and not carrying out the step of disqualifying the contact force as a glass break if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within the second time window.

4. An apparatus as recited in claim 2, wherein the second time window is approximately 70 milliseconds or less.

5. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein the time window is approximately 9.7 milliseconds or less.

6. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein said contact sensitive surface comprises framed glass.

7. An apparatus as recited in claim 1, wherein said scaling comprises a scaling factor of approximately 0.35.

8. An apparatus for detecting the breaking of a contact-sensitive surface, comprising:

(a) an acoustic transducer;

(b) a detector circuit responsive to the transducer for detecting an acoustic wave resulting from a contact force applied to the surface and generating a signal representing the acoustic wave, said signal having a plurality of consecutive amplitude peaks of the same or opposite phases; and

(c) means for

(i) scaling the amplitude of the first peak by a scaling factor less than one to establish a threshold level;

(ii) comparing the amplitude of a third peak following a second peak with the amplitude of a first peak preceding the second peak;

(iii) comparing the amplitude of a fourth peak following the third peak with the threshold level; and

(iv) disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within a time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

9. An apparatus as recited in claim 8, further comprising means for comparing the amplitude of the first peak with a second threshold and not carrying out the step of disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within the time window.

10. An apparatus as recited in claim 8, further comprising means for:

(a) comparing the amplitude of the second peak to the threshold level; and

(b) disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the second peak is greater than the threshold level and the second peak occurs within a second time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

11. An apparatus as recited in claim 10, wherein the second time window is approximately 9.7 milliseconds or less.

12. An apparatus as recited in claim 8, wherein the time window is approximately 70 milliseconds or less.

13. An apparatus as recited in claim 8, wherein said contact sensitive surface comprises framed glass.

14. An apparatus as recited in claim 8, wherein said scaling of the amplitude comprises utilizing a scaling factor of approximately 0.35.

15. A method for detecting the breaking of a contact-sensitive surface, comprising:

(a) providing an acoustic transducer;

(b) providing a detector circuit responsive to the transducer for detecting an acoustic wave resulting from a contact force applied to the surface and generating a signal representing said acoustic wave, said signal having a plurality of consecutive amplitude peaks of the same or opposite phases;

(c) scaling the amplitude of a first peak by a scaling factor less than one to establish a threshold level;

(d) comparing the amplitude of a amplitude peak following said first peak to the threshold level; and

(e) disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the second peak is greater than the threshold level and the second peak occurs within a time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

16. A method as recited in claim 15, further comprising:

(f) comparing the amplitude of a third peak following the second peak with the amplitude of the first peak;

(g) comparing the amplitude of a fourth peak following the third peak with the threshold level; and

(h) disqualifying said contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within a second time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

17. A method as recited in claim 16, further comprising comparing the amplitude of the first peak with a second threshold and not carrying out the step of disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within the second time window.

18. A method as recited in claim 16, wherein the second time window is approximately 70 milliseconds or less.

19. A method as recited in claim 15, wherein the time window is approximately 9.7 milliseconds or less.

20. A method as recited in claim 15, wherein said contact sensitive surface comprises framed glass.

21. A method as recited in claim 15, wherein said scaling comprises applying a scaling factor of approximately 0.35.

22. A method for detecting the breaking of a contact-sensitive surface, comprising:

(a) providing an acoustic transducer;

(b) providing a detector circuit responsive to the transducer for detecting an acoustic wave resulting from a contact force applied to the surface and generating a signal representing the acoustic wave, said signal having a plurality of consecutive amplitude peaks of the same or opposite phases;

(c) scaling the amplitude of the first peak by a scaling factor less than one to establish a threshold level;

(d) comparing the amplitude of a third peak following a second peak with the amplitude of a first peak preceding the second peak;

(e) comparing the amplitude of a fourth peak following the third peak with the threshold level; and

(d) disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within a time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

23. A method as recited in claim 22, further comprising comparing the amplitude of the first peak with a second threshold and not carrying out the step of disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the third peak is greater than the amplitude of the first peak and the amplitude of the fourth peak is greater than the threshold within the time window.

24. A method as recited in claim 22, further comprising:

(e) comparing the amplitude of the second peak to the threshold level; and

(f) disqualifying the contact force as a breakage event if the amplitude of the second peak is greater than the threshold level and the second peak occurs within a second time window initiated by detection of the contact force.

25. A method as recited in claim 24, wherein the second time window is approximately 9.7 milliseconds or less.

26. A method as recited in claim 22, wherein the time window is approximately 70 milliseconds or less.

27. A method as recited in claim 22, wherein said contact sensitive surface comprises framed glass.

28. A breakage detection apparatus for use with acoustical transducers to detect panel breakage, comprising:

(a) an acoustic signal processing circuit capable of receiving a signal from a first acoustical transducer which includes transducer amplifying and conditioning circuitry and is capable of measuring signal amplitudes and relationships within a set of pass-bands, wherein at least one of said pass-bands compares signal excursions within said pass-band to a scaled version of the previously detected peak of said signal excursion; and

(b) a timing control circuit that commences sequence timing of a validation interval upon a sufficient signal threshold excursion and controls the acoustic signal processing circuit to validate a breakage event upon suitable waveform conditions being met whereupon a valid alarm is signaled.

29. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein measurements of signal characteristics may be performed within at least three pass-bands.

30. An apparatus as recited in claim 29, wherein the three pass-bands are supported with a high frequency pass-band having a center frequency of approximately 13.5 kilohertz, a medium-frequency pass-band having a center frequency of approximately 4 kilohertz, and a low-frequency pass-band having a center frequency of approximately 22 hertz.

31. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein a low-frequency processing section, being one of said pass bands, within the acoustic signal processing circuit comprises at least one peak detector and an amplitude comparator adapted for comparing a scaled version of a peak registered by said peak detector with signal excursions within said pass-band.

32. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein a medium-frequency processing section within the acoustic signal processing circuit comprises at least one amplitude comparator, and at least one peak detector.

33. An apparatus as recited in claim 32, wherein the a medium-frequency processing section further includes an event comparator whose output may be used for the event trigger which initiates event timing within the circuit.

34. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein a high-frequency processing section within the acoustic signal processing circuit comprises at least one envelope follower.

35. An apparatus as recited in claim 34, wherein the high-frequency processing section comprises at least one amplitude comparator.

36. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising an input for a second transducer input on a second transducer input conditioning circuit, which is connected with the acoustic signal processing circuit to thereby provide for time of arrival processing of the acoustic event waveforms.

37. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising an LED logic and driver circuit that drives a set of external light emitting diodes for the display of status information.

38. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising a low voltage detector circuit for measuring the system voltage and signaling the alarm logic upon excessive voltage excursions which could indicate problems within the system.

39. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising a test mode decode logic circuit wherein a signal triggers the device into a test mode during which various tests of the circuitry are facilitated.

40. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising a self-test logic circuit that allows the testing of the apparatus by routing signals through the transducer amplifying and conditioning circuitry and thereby testing circuit responses of the various signal processing, timing, and logic sections.

41. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising a programmable bias current generator whose output current levels are used for biasing analog components within the acoustic signal processing circuit to provide multiple modes of operation.

42. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, further comprising a gain control circuit for the transducer amplifying circuitry which provide a choice of amplification levels applied to the acoustical transducer signals.

43. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein the circuitry is contained within a mixed-signal application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC).

44. An apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein said panel-breakage comprises the breakage of framed glass.

45. The apparatus as recited in claim 28, wherein said scaled version of the previously detected peak comprises a version of said previously detected peak which has been scaled by multiplying it by approximately 0.35.

46. A method of validating a panel-breakage event from acoustical signals generated by transducers which are received within an acoustical processing circuit, comprising the steps of:

(a) registering a predetermined minimum number of waveform cycles within a high-frequency pass-band above a first threshold which follows within a first interval after an event trigger;

(b) maintaining a sufficient average signal amplitude within a predetermined second interval following the event trigger;

(c) registering a low-frequency component of the signal having a first peak exceeding a second threshold and wherein less than a predetermined number of additional peaks may exceed a predetermined percentage of the first peak amplitude during a third interval, while not exceeding the amplitude of the first peak in the same phase or subsequently exceeding the predetermined percentage of the first peak amplitude in the opposite phase, the low-frequency component diminishing below a specified voltage threshold during a specified fourth interval; and

(d) registering signal ratios of low-frequency signal component (flex) which exceed a specified percentage of a medium-frequency signal component.

47. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the acoustical processing circuit processes signals according to at least three pass-bands.

48. A method as recited in claim 47, wherein three pass-bands are provided as high, medium, and low frequency.

49. A method as recited in claim 48, wherein the high frequency pass-band is configured for a center frequency of approximately 13.5 kilohertz, the medium-frequency pass-band is configured for a center frequency of approximately 4 kilohertz, and a low-frequency pass-band is configured for a center frequency of approximately 22 hertz.

50. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the minimum sufficient number of absolute value waveform peaks during the first interval is set to four.

51. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the predetermined second interval following the event trigger in which to receive a sufficient average signal amplitude is configured for approximately 977 microseconds.

52. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the predetermined number of additional peaks is set at two when the third interval is configured to approximately 9.7 milliseconds, and is set at one when the third interval is configured for approximately 4.8 milliseconds.

53. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the specified percentage of the medium-frequency signal component is dependent on the medium-frequency amplitude range.

54. A method as recited in claim 53, wherein the specified percentage under a normal amplitude range is configured for 50% while the specified percentage under high-amplitude conditions is configured for 5%.

55. A method as recited in claim 54, wherein the normal amplitude is of a medium-frequency signal component in the range of 93 decibels to 130 decibels, while the high-amplitude condition is of a medium-frequency signal component exceeding approximately 130 decibels.

56. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the fourth interval is configured for approximately 70 milliseconds.

57. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein the event trigger occurs upon receiving a signal exceeding approximately 93 decibels.

58. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein said panel-breakage comprises the breakage of framed glass.

59. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein said predetermined percentage of said first peak amplitude comprises 35%.

60. A method as recited in claim 46:

wherein said first interval spans approximately 1.9 milliseconds;

wherein said second interval spans approximately 4.8 milliseconds;

wherein said third interval spans approximately 7.8 milliseconds; and

wherein said fourth interval spans approximately 9.7 milliseconds.

61. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein said registering of said signal ratios are performed over an interval of approximately 30 milliseconds.

62. A method as recited in claim 46, wherein during said first interval after said event trigger the absolute value of the signal may not exceed a given threshold value for a given maximum period of time.

63. A method as recited in claim 62, wherein said threshold value comprises approximately 400 milliseconds and said given maximum period of time comprises approximately 488 microseconds.

64. A method of validating a panel-breakage event within an acoustical detector circuit which processes acoustical signals in each of at least three pass-bands, comprising the steps of:

(a) qualifying a trigger event within a medium-frequency pass-band having an amplitude which exceeds an event threshold and commencing to time an event interval;

(b) registering a minimum sufficient number of crossings of the absolute value of the signal over a dual-trigger threshold within a high-frequency pass-band during a dual-trigger interval within the event interval;

(c) maintaining a sufficient average absolute signal level during the event interval;

(d) registering a crossing from the absolute value of low-frequency flex signal over a flex threshold within a flex interval within the event interval and recording the phase of the signal;

(e) registering within a first vibration interval less than two crossings of a threshold which is set approximately equal to 35% of the absolute value of the first low-frequency flex peak of opposite polarity to the recorded phase of the flex signal to discriminate impacts;

(f) maintaining within a second vibration interval a flex signal level below the amplitude of the same polarity as the recorded phase of the first flex signal peak and below a threshold of about 35% of first flex signal peak in the opposite polarity of the recorded signal phase to discriminate impacts;

(g) maintaining a low-frequency flex signal amplitude below a flex validation threshold for a period of less than a maximum flex interval within a validation interval within the event interval;

(h) maintaining signal amplitude ratios between the medium-frequency pass-band and the low-frequency flex signal that are consistent with that of a breaking panel; and

(i) termination of the event interval and communicating a valid panel-breakage alarm if the above conditions have been met.

65. A method as recited in claim 64, wherein the detector is configured with a low-frequency pass-band having a center frequency of approximately 22 hertz, a medium-frequency pass-band having a center frequency of approximately 4 kilohertz, and a high-frequency pass-band having a center frequency of approximately 13.5 kilohertz.

66. A method as recited in claim 64, wherein the dual-trigger interval is configured to approximately 977 microseconds and the dual-trigger minimum crossing count value is set to four.

67. A method as recited in claim 64, wherein the first vibration interval in which the absolute value crossing is registered is configured for approximately 7.8 milliseconds from the trigger event.

68. A method as recited in claim 64, wherein the second vibration interval spans approximately 70 milliseconds from the event trigger.

69. A method as recited in claim 64, wherein the maximum flex interval is configured for approximately 488 microseconds within a validation interval commencing from the trigger event spanning approximately 1.9 milliseconds.

70. A method as recited in claim 64, wherein said panel-breakage comprises the breakage of framed glass.