Method and system for selectively blocking delivery of bulk electronic mail

• US 6,546,416 B1
• Filed: 12/09/1998
• Issued: 04/08/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 12/09/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Google LLC (Alphabet Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Infoseek Corporation (The Walt Disney Company)
• Inventors: Kirsch, Steven T.
• Primary Examiner(s): VU, VIET DUY
• Application Number:
  US09/208,330
• Time in Patent Office: 1,581 Days
• Field of Search: 709/203, 709/204, 709/206, 709/219, 709/223, 709/224, 709/225, 709/313, 713/201
• US Class Current: 709/206
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/107 Computer-aided management of electronic mailing [e-mailing]
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 51/212 using filtering or selective blocking

Abstract

The origin address of an e-mail message is validated to enable blocking of e-mail from spam e-mail sources, by preparing, in response to the receipt of a predetermined e-mail message from an unverified source address, a data key encoding information reflective of the predetermined e-mail message. This message, including the data key, is then issued to the unverified source address. The computer system then operates to detect whether a response e-mail message, responsive to the challenge e-mail message, is received and whether the response e-mail message includes a response key encoding predetermined information reflective of a predetermined aspect of the challenge e-mail message. The unverified source address may be recorded in a verified source address list. Thus, when an e-mail message is received, the computer may operate to accept receipt of a predetermined e-mail message on condition that the source address of the predetermined e-mail message is recorded in the verified source address list and alternatively on condition that the predetermined e-mail message includes the response key.

Claims

1. A method of filtering e-mail comprising the steps of:

a) determining an e-mail source address from a message;

b) accepting said message by a first computer where said source address is known to a second computer;

c) (i) autonomously issuing an e-mail message to said source address where said source address is unknown to said second computer, said e-mail message including predetermined data for use in identifying a response message, said predetermined data including a challenge request having a text statement and a digital signature;

(ii) delaying acceptance of said message by said first computer where said source address is unknown to said second computer until predetermined criteria are met, wherein a first predetermined criteria includes receipt of said response message with a modification to said text statement and with said digital signature.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein said step of accepting is qualified as accepting said message by said first computer where said source address is known to said second computer by reference to a first list, said method further comprising the step of discarding said message where said source address is known to said second computer by reference to a second list.

3. The method of claim 1 or 2 further comprising the step of accepting said response message where said response message includes derived data corresponding to said predetermined data.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein acceptance of said response message causes said source address to become known to said second computer and said message to be accepted by said first computer.

5. The method of claim 4 further comprises the step of validating the correspondence of said derived data to said predetermined data.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein said step of validating determines the validity of the correspondence based on said predetermined data and other predetermined data wherein said other predetermined data is determined by said second computer independent of said message.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein said step of delaying includes the step of discarding said message when said predetermined criteria cannot be met.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein said first and second computers are the same computer.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein said second computer operates as a spam firewall for a network of computers including said first computer.

10. A spam filter system for blocking the acceptance of e-mail from unverifiable sources, said system comprising:

a) a filtering computer system coupleable to a network for the exchange of e-mail messages; and

b) a repository coupleable to said filtering computer system that stores first and second e-mail source lists,

wherein said filtering computer system accepts receipt of e-mail having an e-mail source identified on said first e-mail source list, rejects receipt of e-mail having an e-mail source identified on said second e-mail source list, and accepts receipt of e-mail including predetermined data, wherein said predetermined data includes receipt of a response message with a modified text statement and with a digital signature.

11. The spam filter system of claim 10 wherein said filtering computer system holds a predetermined e-mail having an unverified e-mail source unidentified on said first and second e-mail source lists and wherein said predetermined e-mail is held for acceptance subject to predetermined criteria, which includes subsequent receipt of e-mail including said predetermined data.

12. The spam filter system of claim 11 wherein a challenge e-mail is issued by said spam filter system in response to the receipt of said predetermined e-mail, said challenge e-mail being issued to said unverified e-mail source, said challenge e-mail including a predetermined challenge.

13. The spam filter system of claim 12 wherein said predetermined data is a function of said predetermined challenge and wherein said unverified e-mail source is recorded on said first e-mail source list following receipt of e-mail, including said predetermined data, from said unverified e-mail source.

14. The spam filter system of claim 13 wherein said unverified e-mail source is recorded on said second e-mail source list following failure to receive said predetermined data from said unverified e-mail source.

15. The spam filter system of claim 14 wherein said predetermined e-mail is rejected following failure to receive said predetermined data from said unverified e-mail source.

16. A method of operating a computer for the purpose of validating the origin address of an e-mail message to enable blocking of e-mail from spam e-mail sources, said method comprising the steps of:

a) preparing, in response to the receipt of a predetermined e-mail message from an unverified source address, a data key encoding information reflective of some aspect of said predetermined e-mail message;

b) issuing a challenge e-mail message including said data key to said unverified source address; and

c) detecting whether a response e-mail message, responsive to said challenge e-mail message, is received and whether said response e-mail message includes a response key encoding predetermined information reflective of a predetermined aspect of said challenge e-mail message.

17. The method of claim 16 further comprising the steps of:

a) recording, in response to receipt of said responsive key, said unverified source address in a verified source address list; and

b) accepting receipt of a predetermined e-mail message on condition that the source address of said predetermined e-mail message is recorded in said verified source address list and alternatively on condition that said predetermined e-mail message includes said response key.

18. The method of claim 17 wherein said response key is provided in said challenge e-mail message so as to be returned with any automatic return of said challenge e-mail message as said response e-mail message.

19. A system for discriminating between messages categorizable as first or second message types exchangeable between first and second computer systems via a communications network, wherein messages are directed from originators to recipients, said system comprising:

a) an authentication computer system associated with a predetermined recipient, said authentication computer system being coupleable to said communications network to allow receipt of a predetermined original message directed to said predetermined recipient;

b) a database of identified originators operable to provide a determination of whether a predetermined originator is identified in said database, said determination being accessible by said authentication computer system,

wherein said authentication computer system includes means, responsive to the state of said determination, for issuing a predetermined reply message to said predetermined originator, said predetermined reply message including an encoded digital predetermined signature, and means, responsive to the receipt of a predetermined response message including data derived from said predetermined signature, for validating said data and causing said predetermined originator to be added to said database.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein said predetermined signature encodes data specific to said predetermined reply message and wherein said validating means determines whether said data and said predetermined response message are validly responsive to said predetermined reply message, an affirmative determination enabling said authentication computer system to provide for the addition of said predetermined originator to said database.

21. The system of claim 20 wherein said database includes first and second lists of identified originators, wherein said validating means categorizes said predetermined message as a first message type when said predetermined originator is included in said first list of identified originators, wherein said validating means categorizes said predetermined message as a second message type when said predetermined originator is included in said second list of identified originators, and wherein said authentication computer system provides for retaining messages of said first message type and provides for discarding messages of said second message type.

22. The system of claim 21 wherein said predetermined signature encodes a predetermined portion of said predetermined reply message and wherein said validating means identifies said predetermined portion from said data in determining whether the predetermined response message is valid.

23. The system of claim 22 wherein said predetermined signature further encodes a first date and wherein said validating means compares said first date with a second date in determining whether the predetermined response message is valid.

24. The system of claim 23 wherein the derived relationship between said data and said predetermined signature is operatively defined by information provided by said means for issuing in said predetermined reply message.