Method of verifying spindle bearing functionality prior to service

• US 6,546,781 B1
• Filed: 10/05/2000
• Issued: 04/15/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 10/05/2000
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Ford Motor Company
• Original Assignee: Ford Motor Company
• Inventors: Deegan, Michael David, Loo, Ming
• Primary Examiner(s): Larkin, Daniel S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): SAINT SURIN, JACQUES M
• Application Number:
  US09/679,670
• Time in Patent Office: 922 Days
• Field of Search: 73/18.2, 73/18.4, 73/110.1, 735/93, 736/59, 736/60, 736/63, 735/79
• US Class Current: 73/1.82
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2291/014 Resonance or resonant frequency
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/045 by imparting shocks to the workpiece and detecting the vibrations or the acoustic waves caused by the shocks measuring resonant frequency G01H13/00; measuring strength properties by application of mechanical stress G01N3/00

Abstract

A method of verifying spindle bearing functionality prior to service, comprising: assembling a machine-tool spindle having an outer housing rotatably supporting an inner spindle shaft about a spindle axis by use of roller bearing sets, at least one set being compressed along the spindle axis to promote a resilient bearing preload force between the housing and shaft; suspending the housing of said assembly on a non-resonating flexible support, the spindle shaft being essentially isolated from the housing except for the preloaded rolling bearing set; sharply striking the inner spindle shaft along said spindle axis to induce an axially oscillating frequency; measuring the oscillating frequency in the shaft as it is affected by the degree of bearing preload of such at least one bearing set; and comparing the measured induced frequency to a known frequency analysis for the type of spindle assembly which is correlated to varying bearing preloads, the comparison indicating the spindle bearing functionality prior to service.

Claims

1. A method of verifying spindle bearing functionality prior to service, said spindle having been assembled with a housing about a shaft carrying one or more bearing sets axially compressed to exert a preload force between the housing and shaft, comprising:

(a) suspending the housing of said assembly on an essentially non-resonating support allowing said shaft and said housing the freedom to oscillate except as modified by the preloaded bearing force there-between;

(b) sharply striking the end of the shaft to induce its natural vibration frequency as modified by the degree of axial bearing preload stiffness between said housing and shaft; and

(c) measuring said induced frequency and comparing it to known frequency data for said type of spindle assembly correlated to varying bearing preload stiffnesses, where said known frequency data is gathered by use of a computer implemented analytical dynamic model wherein axial spindle frequency is calculated for varying bearing preloads by the relationship F_a=½

π

k_a/Mm/M+m, with M being the outer mass, m being the inner mass, and k_a being axial stiffness calculated as a function of bearing preload force and bearing axial deflection.

2. The method as in claim 1, in which said comparison is carried out by plotting said frequency data as a function of preload forces and determining where the measured frequency intercepts said plot for revealing the existing preload condition.

3. A method of verifying spindle bearing functionality prior to service, comprising:

(a) assembling a machine-tool spindle having an outer housing rotatably supporting an inner spindle shaft about a spindle axis by use of a front bearing set located on said shaft and adjacent to the working end of said shaft, and a rear bearing set located remote from said working end of the shaft, whereby the front bearing set is provided with a bearing preload while the rear bearing set is free to slide within the housing absent any preload there-between;

(b) suspending the housing of said assembly on a non-resonating flexible support set;

(c) striking the inner spindle shaft along said spindle axis to induce an axially oscillating frequency;

(d) measuring said oscillating frequency in said shaft or housing as it is affected by the degree of bearing preload of said at least one bearing set; and

(e) comparing said measured induced frequency to a known frequency analysis for said type of spindle assembly which is correlated to varying bearing preloads, said comparis on indicating the spindle bearing functionality prior to service.

4. The method as in claim 3, in which in step (e) said comparison is carried out to find the preload force of the spindle under test and determine if such tested preload force is within a designed range of preload forces.

5. The method as in claim 3, in which the said front bearing has (i) one or more rows of first roller bearings operating between inner and outer races, all with the same first bearing contact angle, ii) one or more rows of second roller bearings operating between inner and outer races, all with the same second bearing contact angle opposite and complementary to the first contact angle, and (iii) inner and outer spacer bushings separating said first and second roller bearing rows, said inner spacer bushing having a predefined offset gap relative to said outer spacer bushing to create spacing for axially compressing the inner races of said bearing sets and generate a preload force by incrementally deforming said roller bearings between said inner and outer races.

6. The method as in claim 5, in which said offset gap is created by grinding away the ends of said races or spacer bushings to an offset with tolerances on the order of approximately 0.0001 inch.

7. The method as in claim 3, in which said support is comprised of fabric or soft foam.

8. The method as in claim 3, in which said housing and shaft and bearing elements are comprised of metal.