Forward link inter-generation soft handoff between 2G and 3G CDMA systems

• US 6,567,666 B2
• Filed: 05/20/1999
• Issued: 05/20/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 12/02/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Avago Technologies International Sales Pte Limited (Broadcom, Inc.)
• Original Assignee: Infineon Technologies North America Corporation (Infineon Technologies AG)
• Inventors: Czaja, Stanislaw, Anderson, Kraig
• Primary Examiner(s): Urban, Edward F.
• Assistant Examiner(s): ZEWDU, MELESS NMN
• Application Number:
  US09/314,987
• Publication Number:
  US 20020037726A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,461 Days
• Field of Search: 455/436, 455/442, 455/444, 455/426, 370/331, 370/332, 370/335, 445/422, 445/437, 445/443, 445/448, 445/432
• US Class Current: 455/442
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 36/142 over the same radio air interface technology
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 36/18 for allowing seamless reselection, e.g. soft reselection
• CPC Class Codes: H04W 36/304 due to measured or perceived resources with higher communication quality

Abstract

In a CDMA cellular radiotelephone system, a soft handoff (SHO) is performed when a mobile station communicates with a new inter-generation base station, without interrupting communications with the old base station. Currently, a SHO can only be used between CDMA channels having identical frequency assignments and within the same system generation (i.e., 2G2G, or 3G3G, where 2G is a second generation system, and 3G is a third generation system). The proposed IS-2000 standard for a 2G3G handoff is a hard handoff or “Break-Before-Make” procedure, which greatly reduces the quality of service (QOS). The present invention allows for SHO between second and third generation CDMA systems (2G3G and 3G2G), by modifying the proposed messaging structure. This provides a smooth service transition when a mobile station travels from one service area (i.e., 2G), to another service area (i.e., 3G), using the SHO or “Make-Before-Break” approach.

Claims

1. A method to be performed by a mobile device, the method comprising:

receiving a first data signal from a first system that uses a first modulation scheme;

receiving a second data signal from a second system that uses a second modulation scheme, the second modulation scheme being different from the first modulation scheme;

receiving from a system controller modulation information identifying the modulation scheme used by the second system;

performing a soft handoff between the first and second system by;

using the received modulation information to select a soft handoff procedure from a plurality of soft handoff procedures including a first procedure and a second procedure;

if the first procedure is selected;

demodulating and decoding the first data signal while independently demodulating and decoding the second data signal; and

dropping the first data signal upon determining that the second data signal is stronger than the first data signal;

if the second procedure is selected;

demodulating the first data signal while independently demodulating the second data signal;

combining the first and second data signals and decoding the two signals together; and

dropping the first data signal upon determining that the second data signal is stronger than the first data signal.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the first system is an IS-95 CDMA system and the second system is an IS-2000 CDMA system.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein:

the first and second modulation schemes differ in that they have different spreading rates.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein:

each modulation scheme has a spreading rate, a data rate and a coding rate; and

the received modulation information identifies the spreading, data, and coding rates of the second modulation scheme.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein using the received modulation information to select a handoff procedure includes:

using the received modulation information to determine whether the first and second modulation schemes have the same spreading, data, and coding rates.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein:

the first procedure is selected if the first and second modulation schemes have the same data rates but different spreading and coding rates.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein:

the second procedure is selected if the first and second modulation schemes have the same data and coding rates, but different spreading rates.

8. The method of claim 1, wherein determining that the second data signal is stronger than the first data signal includes:

determining that the strength of the first data signal has dropped below a threshold energy value.

9. The method of claim 8, wherein:

the received modulation information specifies the threshold energy value.

10. The method of claim 1, wherein determining that the second data signal is stronger than the first data signal includes:

determining that the number of good frames that have been decoded from the second data signal meets a threshold number of frames.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein:

the received modulation information specifies the threshold frame number of frames.