Method of operating an ion beam therapy system with monitoring of beam position

• US 6,600,164 B1
• Filed: 11/02/2001
• Issued: 07/29/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 02/19/1999
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Gessellschaft Fur Schwerionenforschung MbH
• Original Assignee: Gessellschaft Fur Schwerionenforschung MbH
• Inventors: Poppensiecker, Klaus, Haberer, Thomas, Badura, Eugen, Eickhoff, Hartmut, Essel, Hans-Georg
• Primary Examiner(s): Lee, John R.
• Assistant Examiner(s): EL SHAMMAA, MARY A
• Application Number:
  US09/890,895
• Time in Patent Office: 634 Days
• Field of Search: 250/492.1, 250/492.21, 250/492.3, 250/505
• US Class Current: 250/492.3
• CPC Class Codes: A61N 5/1048 Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
• CPC Class Codes: G21K 5/04 with beam-forming means
• CPC Class Codes: G21K 5/10 with provision for relative movement of beam source and object to be irradiated

Abstract

A method for the operation of an ion beam therapy system that comprises a grid scanner device, arranged in a beam guidance system (6, 8), having vertical deflection means (13) and horizontal deflection means (14) for the vertical and horizontal deflection of a treatment beam (11) perpendicular to its beam direction, with the result that the treatment beam (11) is deflected by the grid scanner device to an isocentre (10) of the irradiation site and scans a specific area surrounding the isocentre (10). For monitoring the operational stability and operational safety of the therapy system, the beam position of the treatment beam (11) in the region of the isocentre (10) is monitored and evaluated, intervention in the ion beam therapy system being carried out if the evaluation of the beam position shows a departure, from a predetermined desired value, that exceeds a specific tolerance value based on a required half-value width of the beam profile. That tolerance value is especially ±25 % of the required half-value width.

Claims

1. Method for the operation of an ion beam therapy system, having monitoring of the beam position, wherein the ion beam therapy system comprises

at least one ion source (1)

an accelerator device (2, 5) for the acceleration of the ions of the ion source (1) in the form of a treatment beam (11),

a beam guidance system (6, 8), to guide the treatment beam (11) from the accelerator device (2, 5) to at least one irradiation site for treatment of a patient, the beam guidance system (6, 8) comprising at least one beam guidance channel (6), and

a grid scanner device, arranged in the beam guidance system (6, 8), having vertical deflection means (13) and horizontal deflection means (14) for the vertical and horizontal deflection of the treatment beam (11) perpendicular to its beam direction, with the result that the treatment beam (11) is deflected by the grid scanner device to an isocentre (10) of the irradiation site and scans a specific area surrounding the isocentre (10),

wherein the beam position of the treatment beam (11) in the region of the isocentre (10) is monitored and evaluated, and

wherein intervention in the ion beam therapy system is carried out if the evaluation of the beam position shows a departure, from a predetermined desired value, that exceeds a specific tolerance value based on a required half-value width of the beam profile, and

wherein the beam position of the treatment beam (11) is monitored online during performance of an irradiation procedure using a plurality of multi-wire chambers arranged spaced apart from one another, characterised in that

the multi-wire chambers are arranged differently spaced from the isocentre (10) and so aligned that the treatment beam (11) extending through the isocentre (10) runs perpendicularly through the centre of the multi-wire chambers,

an absolute zero point of the beam position and an absolute beam profile width of the treatment beam (11) being ascertained, and

the multi-wire chambers being calibrated with respect to the absolute zero point and the absolute beam profile width of the treatment beam (11), the absolute zero point and the absolute beam profile width of the treatment beam (11) being determined with the aid of a verification film, which is irradiated with the treatment beam (11), and

the absolute zero point determined with the aid of the verification film and the absolute beam profile width determined with the aid of the verification film being compared with an absolute zero point determined with the aid of the multi-wire chambers and with an absolute beam profile width determined with the aid of the multi-wire chambers, and

the differences resulting from that comparison being taken into account, in the monitoring of the beam position of the treatment beam (11) by the multi-wire chambers, as correction offsets in the desired position values.

2. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that

the tolerance value is ±

25% of the required half-value width of the beam profile.

3. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that the beam position and the beam profile width of the treatment beam (11) are monitored using two multi-wire chambers arranged spaced apart from one another, one of which is arranged approximately 970 mm upstream of the isocentre (10) and the other of which is arranged approximately 790 mm upstream of the isocentre (10).

4. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that the verification film is irradiated with the treatment beam (11) at a plurality of positions and the absolute zero point of each position is compared with the corresponding absolute zero point that has been determined with the aid of the multi-wire chambers, in order to obtain the correction offset values for the desired position values.

5. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that the beam position of the treatment beam (11) in the region of the isocentre (10) is monitored with the aid of a profile grid.

6. Method according to claim 5, characterised in that

the isocentre (10) is made visible with the aid of a laser marking;

and

the profile grid is aligned onto the isocentre (10) made visible by that means.

7. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that, as a further beam parameter, the axial position of the treatment beam (11) in the final portion of the beam guidance system (6, 8) to the irradiation site is monitored and evaluated.

8. Method according to claim 7, characterised in that

intervention in the ion beam therapy system is carried out if the evaluation of the axial position of the treatment beam (11) shows a departure, from a predetermined desired value, that exceeds a specific tolerance value based on the required half-value width of the beam profile.

9. Method according to claim 7, characterised in that the axial position of the treatment beam (11) is monitored with the aid of two profile grids, one profile grid (16) being arranged in the beam guidance system (6, 8) downstream of the grid scanner device (13, 14) and the other profile grid being arranged between a beam outlet window of the beam guidance system (6, 8) and the isocentre (10).

10. Method according to claim 9, characterised in that,

on the basis of the separately obtained measurement results of the two profile grids (16), the beam position to be expected in the isocentre (10) is determined and compared with the predetermined desired value.

11. Method according to claim 7, characterised in that the axial position of the treatment beam (11) is checked during a test cycle over the entire energy and focusing range of the ion beam therapy system.

12. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that

intervention in the ion beam therapy system is carried out if the evaluation of the beam profile width of the treatment beam (11) shows a departure of more than ±

50% from a predetermined desired value.

13. Method according to claim 12, characterised in that

intervention in the ion beam therapy system is carried out if the evaluation of the beam profile width of the treatment beam (11) shows a departure of more than ±

50% from the predetermined desired value in the irradiation energy range>

200 MeV/u.

14. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that

the verification film is irradiated with a plurality of horizontal and vertical stripes of the treatment beam (11) and the absolute beam profile width of each stripe is compared with the corresponding beam profile width that has been determined with the aid of the multi-wire chambers in order to obtain correction offset values for the predetermined desired value.

15. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that the beam profile width of the treatment beam (11) in the region of the isocentre (10) is monitored with the aid of a profile grid.

16. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that, as a further beam parameter, the variation in the particle count of the treatment beam (11) in the region of the isocentre (10) is monitored and evaluated.

17. Method according to claim 16, characterised in that,

for monitoring the variation in the particle count of the treatment beam (11), the average intensity of the treatment beam in a specific time window is determined by means of a first measurement and it is checked whether, in subsequent measurements, the intensity of the treatment beam measured in the time window differs from the average intensity by more than a specific tolerance value.

18. Method according to claim 17, characterised in that

the time window has a duration of 300 ps and the tolerance value corresponds to five times the value of the average intensity.

19. Method according to claim 1, characterised in that, before an irradiation procedure is carried out using the ion beam therapy system, it is checked whether movable components present in the region of the beam guide of the treatment beam (11) to the irradiation site are to be found in the beam path.

20. Method according to claim 19, characterised in that

the position of the movable components present in the region of the beam guide of the treatment beam (11) to the irradiation side is checked with the aid of limit switches connected to the movable components.