Method for monitoring an entrance to a hazardous area

• US 6,624,751 B2
• Filed: 08/06/2001
• Issued: 09/23/2003
• Est. Priority Date: 08/07/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Leuze Lumiflex GmbH & Co. KG (Leuze electronic GmbH & Co. KG)
• Original Assignee: Leuze Lumiflex GmbH & Co. KG (Leuze electronic GmbH & Co. KG)
• Inventors: Rohbeck, Volker, Haberer, Hermann
• Primary Examiner(s): SWARTHOUT, BRENT
• Application Number:
  US09/922,829
• Publication Number:
  US 20020017603A1
• Time in Patent Office: 778 Days
• Field of Search: 340/541, 340/555, 340/556, 340/557, 340/5.2, 340/5.8, 340/942, 340/552, 348/82-85, 348/143-161, 382/103, 714/742, 250/221, 250/222.R, 250/559.12, 250/559.2, 250/559.4, 250/221.1, 361/177
• US Class Current: 340/555
• CPC Class Codes: G01V 8/20 using multiple transmitters or receivers

Abstract

A method for monitoring an entrance to a hazardous area comprising sensing a signal pattern generated by light barriers when an object passes the entrance and comparing the sensed signed pattern with at least one predetermined signal pattern. The object is admissible if the signal patterns are identical and under certain other conditions.

Claims

1. A method for monitoring an entrance of a hazardous area with the aid of a light grid arrangement comprising light barriers, said method comprising the following steps:

a) recording actual received brightness values H of an individual light beam associated with a respective light barrier;

b) deriving a signal pattern from the received brightness values H by comparing the actual received brightness values with an upper threshold value SO and a lower threshold value SU, wherein the received brightness values H are assigned to the following signal states;

“

free”

H>

SO

“

blanked”

H<

SU

“

partially blanked”

SU<

H<

SO

and wherein the individual signal states of the light beams form the derived signal pattern;

c) comparing the derived actual signal pattern to a predetermined signal pattern of an object that is considered permissible to enter the hazardous area; and

d) determining the object as a permissible object if one of the derived signal pattern coincides with the predetermined signal pattern, and an actual signal state “

partially blanked”

or “

blanked”

is obtained in place of a predetermined signal state “

free”

or “

partially blanked”

for a light beam in the region of a first edge of the object, an actual signal state “

blanked”

or “

free”

is obtained for a light beam in a region of a second edge of the object in place of the predetermined signal state “

blanked”

or “

partially blanked” and

the remaining signal states of the derived signal pattern coincide with the signal states of the predetermined signal pattern.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein each light barrier is configured as free, blanked or partially blanked according to a predetermined reception brightness in dependence on the size and shape or the alignment of a predetermined admissible object, wherein the reception brightness H of a blanked light barrier lies below a predetermined lower threshold value SU, the reception brightness of a free light barrier lies above a predetermined upper limiting value SO and the reception brightness of a partially blanked light barrier lies between the upper and the lower limiting value.

3. The method according to claim 2 wherein one of said light barriers which is configured to be interrupted is also interpreted as being blanked and another of said light barrier which is configured to be free is also interpreted as being free if the actual reception brightness of the light barriers lies between the lower limiting value and the upper limiting value.

4. The method according to claim 1 wherein the object is only considered to be admissible if statuses of all light beams of the sensed signal pattern which extend inside and outside the marginal region of the object correspond to those of the predetermined signal pattern.

5. The method according to claim 4 wherein actual beam statuses of the respective light barriers are successively compared with an assigned, preconfigured beam status during a monitoring cycle, wherein a counter is decremented if the reception brightness of a light barrier is lower than an assigned, configured reception brightness of a light barrier is greater than an assigned, configured reception brightness, and wherein an off-signal is generated if the beam status of more than one light barrier deviates from the configured beam status during the monitoring cycle or if the counter has a value that deviates from an initial count at the end of the monitoring cycle after all light barriers are checked.

6. The method according to claim 1 wherein a predetermined number of said light bafflers is configured to be blanked or free, and only a number of actually blanked or free light barriers is compared with a configured number.

7. The method according to claim 6 wherein an on-signal is generated if a number of blanked light barriers is greater than zero and less than or equal to the configured number of interrupted light barriers, and an off-signal is generated if all light barriers are free.

8. The method according to claim 6 wherein an on-signal is generated if the number of blanked light beams is less than a predetermined number, and an off-signal is generated if light barriers are blanked, subsequently become free again and are then blanked anew without an operator having generated a restart signal.

9. The method according to claim 1 wherein a protected area formed by the light barriers has a predetermined object resolution, wherein it can be predetermined that an object to be identified blanks or partially blanks a predetermined minimum number of light barriers.

10. The method according to claim 1 wherein a series of light barriers are arranged parallel to one another.

11. The method according to claim 1 wherein a series of light barriers are arranged in the shape of a light screen.