Method for energy management and overspeed protection of a centrifuge

• US 6,679,820 B2
• Filed: 11/20/2001
• Issued: 01/20/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 04/11/2000
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Kendro Laboratory Products LP (Thermo Fisher Scientific Incorporated)
• Original Assignee: Kendro Laboratory Products LP (Thermo Fisher Scientific Incorporated)
• Inventors: Potter, Raymond Gary, Barkus, David Alan
• Primary Examiner(s): Cooley, Charles E.
• Assistant Examiner(s): SORKIN, DAVID L
• Application Number:
  US09/989,780
• Publication Number:
  US 20020077240A1
• Time in Patent Office: 791 Days
• Field of Search: 494/7-10, 494/12, 494/37, 494/84, 700/273, 700/275, 700/304, 702/96, 702/141, 702/145, 702/147, 702/41, 702/44, 324/160-162, 318/476
• US Class Current: 494/8
• CPC Class Codes: B04B 13/00 Control arrangements specially designed for centrifuges; Programme control of centrifuges control arrangements for feed, charge, or discharge B04B11/00
• CPC Class Codes: B04B 13/003 Rotor identification systems
• CPC Class Codes: B04B 9/10 Control of the drive; Speed regulating for solid bowl screw centrifuges B04B1/2016

Abstract

There is provided a method for limiting an operating speed of a rotor installed in a centrifuge system. The method includes the steps of (a) determining whether an actual change in energy required to accelerate the rotor from a first speed to a second speed is within a predetermined range of an expected change in energy required to accelerate the rotor from the first speed to the second speed, and (b) limiting the operating speed when the actual change in energy is not within the predetermined range of the expected change in energy.

Claims

1. A method for limiting an operating speed of a rotor installed in a centrifuge system, comprising:

(a) determining whether an actual change in energy required to accelerate said rotor from a first speed to a second speed is within a predetermined range of an expected change in energy required to accelerate said rotor from said first speed to said second speed; and

(b) limiting said operating speed when said actual change in energy is not within said predetermined range of said expected change in energy.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein step (a) comprises:

(a1) receiving a rotor identification; and

(a2) determining, from said identification, said expected change in energy required to accelerate said rotor from said first speed to said second speed.

3. The method according to claim 2, wherein step (a2) comprises looking up said expected change in energy in a table indexed by said identification.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein step (a) comprises:

(a1) accelerating said rotor to said first speed;

(a2) determining an actual energy required to accelerate said rotor to said first speed;

(a3) accelerating said rotor to said second speed;

(a4) determining an actual energy required to accelerate said rotor to said second speed; and

(a5) determining a change between said actual energy required to accelerate said rotor to said second speed and said actual energy required to accelerate said rotor to said first speed.

5. The method according to claim 4, wherein step (a2) comprises:

(a2A) determining a time interval required to accelerate said rotor to said first speed;

(a2B) determining a representative speed of said rotor during said time interval;

(a2C) determining a torque exerted on said rotor during said time interval; and

(a2D) determining said actual energy from said time interval, representative speed and torque.

6. The method according to claim 5, wherein step (a2C) comprises looking up said torque in a table indexed by said representative speed.

7. The method according to claim 5, wherein step (a2C) comprises calculating said torque from a motor constant and a motor current.

8. The method according to claim 5, wherein step (a2D) further comprises subtracting a motor loss selected from a group consisting of a bearing loss, a core loss and a copper loss.

9. The method according to claim 4, wherein step (a4) comprises the steps of:

(a4A) determining a time interval required to accelerate said rotor to said second speed;

(a4B) determining a representative speed of said rotor during said time interval;

(a4C) determining a torque exerted on said rotor during said time interval; and

(a4D) determining said actual energy from said time interval, representative speed and torque.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein step (a4C) comprises looking up said torque in a table indexed by said representative speed.

11. The method according to claim 9, wherein step (a4C) comprises calculating said torque from a motor constant and a motor current.

12. The method according to claim 9, wherein step (a4D) further comprises subtracting a motor loss selected from a group consisting of a bearing loss, a core loss and a copper loss.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein step (b) comprises looking up a maximum speed in a table indexed by said actual change in energy.