Ethernet fiber access communications system

• US 6,684,031 B1
• Filed: 06/18/1998
• Issued: 01/27/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 06/18/1998
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: WSOU Investments, LLC (WSOU Holdings, LLC)
• Original Assignee: Lucent Technologies, Inc. (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: Krishnamoorthy, Ashok V., Nuss, Martin C., Kogelnik, Herwig W.
• Primary Examiner(s): Pascal, Leslie
• Assistant Examiner(s): Leung, Christina Y
• Application Number:
  US09/099,503
• Time in Patent Office: 2,049 Days
• Field of Search: 359/111, 359/125, 359/167, 359/136, 359/121, 370/447, 370/445, 398/98, 398/99, 398/100, 398/101, 398/89
• US Class Current: 398/99
• CPC Class Codes: H04J 14/0226 Fixed carrier allocation, e.g. according to service
• CPC Class Codes: H04J 14/0227 Operation, administration, maintenance or provisioning [OAMP] of WDM networks, e.g. media access, routing or wavelength allocation
• CPC Class Codes: H04J 14/0246 using one wavelength per ONU
• CPC Class Codes: H04J 14/025 using one wavelength per ONU, e.g. for transmissions from-ONU-to-OLT or from-ONU-to-ONU
• CPC Class Codes: H04J 14/0282 WDM tree architectures
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 11/0066 Provisions for optical burst or packet networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 11/0067 Provisions for optical access or distribution networks, e.g. Gigabit Ethernet Passive Optical Network (GE-PON), ATM-based Passive Optical Network (A-PON), PON-Ring
• CPC Class Codes: H04Q 2011/0064 Arbitration, scheduling or medium access control aspects

Abstract

A high-speed access data network in which upstream and downstream traffic is logically or physically separated. The network can use the Ethernet media access control (MAC) layer protocol over distances that are much larger than conventionally possible with the Ethernet MAC layer protocol. In a configuration including a central office and multiple subscribers, the central office is removed from the collision domain, which can be made relatively small, without limiting the distance between the central office and the subscribers. The downstream data rate is not limited by the size of the collision domain and can thus be made almost arbitrarily large. Furthermore, by allowing a smaller collision domain, greater upstream data rates can be used. It is thus possible to use ubiquitous and inexpensive Ethernet LAN technology in highly cost-sensitive applications such as residential broadband access.

Claims

1. An optical communications system comprising:

a central unit;

a power splitter, the power splitter being coupled to the central unit via optical fiber; and

a plurality of subscriber unit, each of the plurality of subscriber units being coupled to the power splitter via optical fiber,

wherein;

the central unit transmits downstream data to the subscriber unit without media contention and the subscriber units transmit upstream data to the central unit with media contention, and

wherein;

a portion of an upstream data signal transmitted by any one of the plurality of subscriber units is reflected back to each of the subscriber units for detecting the transmission of upstream data by another subscriber unit.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the upstream and downstream data are transmitted over physically separate paths.

3. The system of claim 2, comprising an additional power splitter, wherein:

the power splitter and the additional power splitter are coupled to the central unit via separate optical fibers, and

the power splitter and the additional power splitter are coupled to the subscriber units via separate optical fibers.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the upstream and downstream data are transmitted over logically separate paths.

5. The system of claim 4, wherein the upstream and downstream data are separated by wavelength division multiplexing.

6. The system of claim 4, wherein the upstream and downstream data are spectrally separated.

7. The system of claim 6, wherein the upstream and downstream data have different data rates.

8. The system of claim 4, wherein the downstream data is transmitted during a first time period and the upstream data is transmitted during a second time period.

9. The system of claim 8, wherein the central unit transmits a jamming signal to clear the optical fiber of upstream data.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the downstream data is transmitted at a higher rate than the upstream data.

11. The system of claim 10, wherein the downstream data has a rate at least ten times greater than the upstream data.

12. The system of claim 1, wherein a portion of an upstream data signal transmitted by any one of the subscriber units is provided by the power splitter to the subscriber units.

13. The system of claim 1, wherein the media contention is characterized by a collision domain which does not include the central unit.

14. An optical communications system comprising:

a central unit;

a power splitter, the power splitter being coupled to the central unit via optical fiber; and

a plurality of subscriber unit, each of the plurality of subscriber units being coupled to the power splitter via optical fiber,

wherein;

the central unit transmits downstream data to the subscriber unit without using a carrier sense multiple access with collision detection (CSMA/CD) protocol, and the subscriber units transmit upstream data to the central unit with CSMA/CD protocol, and

wherein;

a portion of an upstream data signal transmitted by any one of the plurality of subscriber units is reflected back to each of the subscriber units for detecting the transmission of upstream data by another subscriber unit.