Table driven design system and method

• US 6,704,917 B1
• Filed: 11/21/2000
• Issued: 03/09/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 11/21/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Micro Industries Corporation
• Original Assignee: Micro Industries Corporation
• Inventors: Hogan, James, Rahaman, Kevin L., Curran, Michael S., Barnhart, Lisa
• Primary Examiner(s): Siek, Vuthe
• Assistant Examiner(s): Rossoshek, Yelena
• Application Number:
  US09/717,990
• Time in Patent Office: 1,204 Days
• Field of Search: 716/1-21, 326/39, 345/501, 700/83, 703/15, 705/1, 705/51, 705/57, 707/8, 707/102, 709/420, 712/20
• US Class Current: 716/102
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2111/02 CAD in a network environment, e.g. collaborative CAD or distributed simulation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/00 Computer-aided design [CAD]

Abstract

The present invention includes a table-driven system for guiding a user through the design of an electronic component. The system utilizes data tables that are adapted to house data relating an electronic component. A modular program is used to extract data from these tables. The modular program contains system logic to utilize this data in guiding the user through the process. A terminal is then used to allow a user to make selections from the choices prompted by the modular program and complete the design process.

Claims

1. A table-driven system for guiding a user through the design of an electronic component, said system comprising:

a) a plurality of design tables, said design tables adapted to store data relating to at least one said electronic component and logic related to the design of said electronic component;

b) a modular program adapted to extract said data from said plurality of design tables and prompt said user with options, said modular program containing system logic designed to utilize said data in said guiding of said user, said prompted options limited by said system logic and at least one of said plurality of design tables in accordance with the feasibility of the design of said electronic component; and

c) at least one terminal adapted to allow said user to make selections from said prompted options and to modify the design of said electronic component, wherein the feasibility of the design of said electronic component is determined according to logic in said design tables as said user makes said selections from said prompted options such that upon completion of said selections, said electronic component design is feasible.

2. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein one of said plurality of design tables is a Block table adapted to separate said design into separate categorical blocks by functionality.

3. A table-driven system according to claim 2 wherein said categorical blocks are further adapted to control flow of said system logic.

4. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein one of said design tables is a Feature table adapted to assist in directing flow of said system logic, said electronic component having features and said Feature table adapted to define how said features are displayed to said user.

5. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein one of said design tables is an Option Flow table adapted to contain information as to said options to be prompted to said user, said options associated with said electronic component.

6. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein one of said design tables is an Interface table adapted to contain, load information relevant to said electronic component.

7. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein one of said design tables is a Module Parts table adapted to store part data relating to the modules of said modular program.

8. A table-driven system according to claim 7 wherein said part data is selected from the group consisting of cost, power, area, and lead-time data.

9. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein one of said design tables is bill of materials table adapted to contain bill of materials data relating to the physical parts of said electronic component.

10. A table-driven system according to claim 9 wherein said bill of materials data is selected from the group consisting of part numbers, part descriptions, approved vendor list data, and quantities per part.

11. A table-driven system according to claim 1 wherein each module of said modular design has a unique identifier.

12. A method for guiding a user through the design of an electronic component, said method comprising the steps of:

a) creating a plurality of design tables comprising logic for determining the feasibility of the design of an electronic component;

b) prompting the user to select a type of said electronic component to be designed;

c) activating the appropriate block for said selected electronic component type, said block adapted to interface with data from said plurality of design tables in order to prompt said user to enter selections for each feature of the selected component type, wherein said selections are limited in accordance with the feasibility of the design of said electronic component;

d) collecting from said user selections for each said feature in response to each said prompt;

e) for said user selections for each said feature in response to each said prompt;

(i) checking the requirements and the feasibility of the design of said electronic component related to said user selections according to said design tables; and

(ii) prompting said user to make alternate selections if the combination of user selections is not feasible;

f) prompting said user for approval of said electronic component determined to be feasible upon completion of said user selections for each said feature in response to each said prompt.

13. A method according to claim 12 additionally comprising the step of repeating steps (b) through (e) for each said block appropriate for said electronic component type.

14. A method according to claim 12 wherein said requirements are selected from the group consisting of cost, area, and power requirements.

15. A method according to claim 12 wherein one of said design tables is a Block table adapted to separate said design into separate categorical blocks based on functionality.

16. A method according to claim 12 wherein one of said design tables is a Feature table adapted to assist in directing flow of said design, said electronic component having features and said Feature table adapted to define how said features are displayed to said user.

17. A method according to claim 12 wherein one of said design tables is an Option Flow table adapted to contain information as to options to be displayed to said user, said options associated with said electronic component.

18. A method according to claim 12 wherein one of said design tables is an Interface table adapted to contain information load information relevant to said electronic component.

19. A method according to claim 12 wherein one of said design tables is a Module Parts table adapted to store parts data relating to said electronic component.

20. A method according to claim 12 wherein one of said design tables is a bill of materials table adapted to contain bill of materials data relating to the physical parts of said electronic component.