Automatic layout selection for information monitoring system

• US 6,707,476 B1
• Filed: 07/05/2000
• Issued: 03/16/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 07/05/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: GE Medical Systems Information Technologies Incorporated (General Electric Company)
• Original Assignee: GE Medical Systems Information Technologies Incorporated (General Electric Company)
• Inventors: Hochstedler, R. Benjamin
• Primary Examiner(s): Kincaid, Kristine
• Assistant Examiner(s): Ke, Peng
• Application Number:
  US09/609,736
• Time in Patent Office: 1,350 Days
• Field of Search: 345/700, 345/789, 345/744, 345/745, 345/797, 345/812, 345/846
• US Class Current: 715/789
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/451 Execution arrangements for user interfaces
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/20 for the management or administration of healthcare resources or facilities, e.g. managing hospital staff or surgery rooms
• CPC Class Codes: G16H 40/60 for the operation of medical equipment or devices

Abstract

A method of switching the layout of an information monitoring system. Layouts are sets of graphical components that are associated with monitored or sensed activities. The invention provides a mechanism for switching the layout when conditions of the monitoring system change. The system determines the currently used components for the current layout, determines the currently used capabilities of the system, and determines a correspondence between the set of currently used components and currently used capabilities. The system reviews a group of layouts and determines a correspondence between the components in the layouts, in the group of layouts, and the set of currently used capabilities of the system. A layout switch occurs if one of the layouts in the group of layouts more closely corresponds to the currently used capabilities of the system than the current layout.

Claims

1. A method of switching the layout of an information monitoring system, the method comprising:

Determining a set of currently used components for a first layout;

Determining a set of currently used external information source monitoring capabilities of the system;

Determining a correspondence between the set of currently used components and the set of currently used capabilities;

Monitoring the system to detect one or more changes in the system'"'"'s ability to monitor external source of information;

After detecting one or more changes in the systems reviewing a predetermined group of layouts and determining a correspondence between the components of at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities of the system; and

Switching from the first layout to the at least one layout if the correspondence between the components of the at least on layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities is greater than the correspondence between the set of currently used components and the set of currently used capabilities.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the act of determining correspondence between components of at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities of the system includes implementing a best guess algorithm.

3. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein a high score is assigned to a layout that exactly matches the set of currently used capabilities of the system.

4. A method as claimed in claim 2, wherein a layout containing more parameters than the parameters associated with the capabilities of the system is assigned a score that is higher than a layout with less parameters than the parameters associated with the set of currently used capabilities of the system.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the act of determining a correspondence between components of at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities of the system is implemented using a weighted system algorithm.

6. A method as claimed in claim 5, wherein predetermined weights are assigned to layout components.

7. A method as claimed in claim 6, wherein layouts are assigned weighted scores based on the weights assigned to their components.

8. A method as claimed in claim 7, wherein the at least one layout is a layout with the highest weighted score.

9. A method as claimed in claim 7, further comprising defining a layout switch threshold.

10. A method as claimed in claim 9, further comprising comparing the layout switch threshold to a weighted score of a chosen layout.

11. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein layout switching is prevented if the weighted score of the chosen layout is less than the layout switch threshold.

12. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the act of determining correspondence between components of at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities of the system includes building weights for layouts according to particular system capability and environmental states.

13. A method of switching layouts in a monitoring system, each layout having one or more components, the method comprising:

determining a set of currently used components for a first layout;

monitoring the system to detect one or more changes in the system'"'"'s ability to monitor external sources of information;

after detecting one or more changes in the system, reviewing a predetermined group of layouts and determining a correspondence between the components of at least one layout of the group of layouts and a set of currently used capabilities of the system; and

providing a switch option interface if the correspondence between the components of the at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities is greater than the correspondence between the set of currently used components and the set of currently used capabilities.

14. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the act of determining a correspondence includes implementing a best guess algorithm.

15. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein a high score is assigned to a layout that exactly matches the set of currently used capabilities of the system.

16. A method as claimed in claim 14, wherein a layout containing more parameters than the parameters associated with the set of currently used capabilities of the system is assigned a score that is higher than a layout with less parameters than the parameters associated with the capabilities of the system.

17. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the act of determining a correspondence is implemented using a weighted system algorithm.

18. A method as claimed in claim 17, wherein predetermined weights are assigned to layout components.

19. A method as claimed in claim 18, wherein layouts are assigned weighted scores based on the weights assigned to their components.

20. A method as claimed in claim 19, wherein the at least one layout is a layout with the highest weighted score.

21. A method as claimed in claim 19, further comprising defining a layout switch threshold.

22. A method as claimed in claim 21, further comprising comparing the layout switch threshold to a weighted score of a chosen layout.

23. A method as claimed in claim 22, wherein layout switching is prevented if the weighted score of the chosen layout is less than the layout switch threshold.

24. A method as claimed in claim 13, wherein the act of determining a correspondence includes building weights for layouts according to particular system capability and environmental states.

25. A method of switching layouts in a monitoring system, each layout having one or more components, the method comprising:

determining a set of currently used external information monitoring capabilities of the system;

monitoring the system'"'"'s environment to detect one or more changes in the system'"'"'s environment;

after detecting one or more changes in the system'"'"'s environment, reviewing a predetermined group of layouts and determining a correspondence between the components of at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities of the system; and

switching from a first layout to the at least one layout if the correspondence between components of the at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities is greater than the correspondence between a set of currently used components of the first layout and the set of currently used capabilities.

26. A method as claimed in claim 25, further comprising providing a switch option interface if the correspondence between the components of the at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities is greater than the correspondence between a set of currently used components of a first layout and the currently used capabilities.

27. A method as claimed in claim 25, further comprising switching from the first layout to the at least one layout if the correspondence between the components of the at least one layout of the group of layouts and the set of currently used capabilities is greater than the correspondence between a set of currently used components of a first layout and the currently used capabilities.

28. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the act of determining a correspondence includes implementing a best guess algorithm.

29. A method as claimed in claim 28, wherein a high score is assigned to a layout that exactly matches the capabilities of the system.

30. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein a layout containing more parameters than the parameters associated with the capabilities of the system is assigned a score that is higher than a layout with less parameters than the parameters associated with the capabilities of the system.

31. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the act of determining correspondence is implemented using a weighted system algorithm.

32. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein predetermined weights are assigned to layout components.

33. A method as claimed in claim 32, wherein layouts are assigned weighted scores based on the weights assigned to their components.

34. A method as claimed in claim 33, wherein the at least one layout is a layout with the highest weighted score.

35. A method as claimed in claim 33, further comprising defining a layout switch threshold.

36. A method as claimed in claim 33, further comprising comparing the layout switch threshold to a weighted score of a chosen layout.

37. A method as claimed in claim 27, wherein layout switching is prevented if the weighted score of the chosen layout is less than the layout switch threshold.

38. A method as claimed in claim 25, wherein the act of determining a correspondence includes building weights for layouts according to particular system capability and environmental states.