Method for detecting deception

• US 6,754,524 B2
• Filed: 08/28/2001
• Issued: 06/22/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 08/28/2000
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: City College of New York
• Original Assignee: City College of New York
• Inventors: Johnson, Ray Jr.
• Primary Examiner(s): Nasser, Robert L.
• Assistant Examiner(s): MALLARI, PATRICIA C
• Application Number:
  US09/942,050
• Publication Number:
  US 20020062089A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,029 Days
• Field of Search: 600/544, 600/545
• US Class Current: 600/544
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/164 Lie detection
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/377 using evoked responses
• CPC Class Codes: A61B 5/7203 for noise prevention, reduction or removal

Abstract

The present invention provides a novel and reliable method for detecting deception in a subject. Deception as well as confabulation may be characterized by detectable changes in a (ERP) activity and/or behavioral responses to stimuli. These changes occur in one or more measures or markers of brain activity or behavioral activity referred to herein as “the neural and behavioral signature of deception.” The method is independent of the intent to commit deception.

Claims

1. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein a smaller maximal amplitude over parietal-central scalp between 400-800 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked averages to the test series compared to the control series, or a smaller maximal amplitude between −

100 before response and +300 ms after response in response-locked averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

3. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein behavioral activity comprises at least one of variability in response speed and accuracy of response.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein a smaller response accuracy to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

5. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein a larger maximal amplitude between 0 and 100 ms after response over central-frontal scalp in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

7. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein a larger negativity maximal over occipital and inferior temporal scalp between 300 and 500 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

9. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein a smaller medical frontal-central scalp maximal positivity between 100 and 200 ms after response in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

11. A method of determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein a smaller medial frontal-central scalp maximal positivity between −

100 and 0 ms before response in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

13. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein a larger negative shift between −

100 before and +200 ms after response maximal over medial central-frontal scalp in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

14. The method of claim 13, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

15. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity;

or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein the difference in activity is a difference in ERN scalp distribution.

16. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with the test series of stimuli;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP), and wherein an increased P300 latency to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

17. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, and wherein behavioral activity comprises at least one of variably in response speed and accuracy of response.

18. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potentials (ERPs), and wherein a smaller positive shift maximal over medial central-frontal scalp between −

100 before and +200 ms after in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

27. The method of claim 18, wherein a slower speed of response in catch trials in the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

19. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potentials (ERPs), and wherein a smaller P300 amplitude increase over parietal scalp between 400 and 800 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked ERP averages and between −

100 before to +300ms after response in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

20. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potentials (ERPs), and wherein a smaller decrease in maximal negativity over occipital scalp between 300 and 500 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

21. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potentials (ERPs), and wherein a smaller increase in positivity over medial frontal-central scalp between −

100 and 0 ms before response in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

22. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potentials (ERPs), and wherein a smaller decrease in ERN over medial central-frontal scalp between 0 and 100 ms after response in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

23. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potentials (ERPs), and wherein a smaller increase positivity over medial central-frontal scalp between 100 and 200 ms after response in response-locked ERP averages to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

24. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with two or more sets of stimuli, each set comprising a test series of stimuli and a control series of stimuli, wherein both the test series and control series include catch trials;

b) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to each set of stimuli; and

c) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to one set of stimuli to the activity from another set of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the sets of stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

25. The method of claim 24 wherein a smaller decrease in speed of responses to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

26. The method of claim 24 wherein a smaller decrease in variability in speed of responses to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

28. The method of claim 24, wherein a larger variability of speed of response in catch trials in the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

29. The method of claim 24, wherein a smaller response accuracy in catch trials in the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

30. The method of claim 24, wherein an equal number of catch trials were presented in the control series in the test series.

31. The method of claim 30, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

32. A method for determining whether a subject possesses guilty knowledge comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli wherein the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the relevant and irrelevant items indicates that the subject posses guilty knowledge.

33. The method of claim 32 wherein the difference in activity is a smaller negativity maximal over left central-frontal scalp between 300 and 500 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked ERP averages for relevant than for irrelevant items.

34. The method of claim 32 wherein the difference in activity is a larger positivity maximal over left-parietal occipital scalp between 500 and 800 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked ERP averages for relevant than for irrelevant items.

35. The method of claim 32 wherein the difference in activity is a smaller negativity maximal over occipital and inferior lateral scalp between 300 and 500 ms after stimulus in stimulus-locked ERP averages for relevant than for irrelevant items.

36. The method of claim 32, wherein the electrophysiological activity comprises event-related brain potential (ERP).

37. A method for determining whether a subject responds deceptively comprising

a) presenting the subject with a test series of stimuli, the test series including catch trials;

b) presenting the subject with a control series of stimuli, the control series including catch trials;

c) monitoring the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavior activity, or both, associated with the subject'"'"'s response to the test series and control series of stimuli;

d) comparing the subject'"'"'s electrophysiological activity, behavioral activity, or both, obtained from the responses to the test series and control series of stimuli;

wherein a difference in the activity between the test and control stimuli indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

38. The method of claim 37 wherein a larger variability of speed of response to the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

39. The method of claim 37, wherein a smaller response accuracy in catch trials in the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

40. The method of claim 37, wherein an equal number of catch trials were presented in the control series as in the test series.

41. The method of claim 40, wherein the test series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items, and the control series of stimuli comprises an equal number of relevant and irrelevant items.

42. The method of claim 37, wherein the slower speed of response in catch trials in the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.

43. The method of claim 37, wherein a larger variability of speed of response in catch trials in the test series compared to the control series indicates that the subject is responding deceptively.