Method for in-tube flaw detection

• US 6,772,637 B2
• Filed: 08/30/2002
• Issued: 08/10/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 09/18/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Baker Hughes Incorporated (Baker Hughes Company)
• Original Assignee: Ngks International Corporation
• Inventors: Desyatchikov, Alexandr P., Karasev, Nikolai A., Smirnov, Anatoly V., Bazarov, Alexandr J., Kirichenko, Sergei P., Slepov, Andrei M.
• Primary Examiner(s): Williams, Hezron
• Assistant Examiner(s): MILLER, ROSE MARY
• Application Number:
  US10/232,182
• Publication Number:
  US 20030061880A1
• Time in Patent Office: 711 Days
• Field of Search: 736/23, 736/22, 736/02, 73/18.2, 738/665, 377/24.1
• US Class Current: 73/623
• CPC Class Codes: G01M 3/005 using pigs or moles G01M3/246, G01M3/2823 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2291/011 Velocity or travel time
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2291/015 Attenuation, scattering
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2291/044 Internal reflections (echoes), e.g. on walls or defects
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 2291/2636 cylindrical from inside
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/07 by measuring propagation velocity or propagation time of acoustic waves
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/11 by measuring attenuation of acoustic waves
• CPC Class Codes: G01N 29/225 Supports, positioning or alignment in moving situation

Abstract

The claimed method of in-tube inspection of a pipeline is effected by passing through the pipeline an inspection pig carrying monitoring transducers responsive to the diagnostic parameters of the pipeline, means for measuring, processing and storage of the measurements data by periodic interrogation of the monitoring transducers during the travel of the inspection pig and processing and storage of the measurement data. The method is characterized in that during the travel of the pig with a period not less than the cycle time of the monitoring transducers the velocity of the inspection pig is determined, and the cycle time of the monitoring transducers is set as a function of at least two values of the pig velocity determined during its travel. The period of determining the inspection pig velocity makes 200-2000 cycles of interrogation of the monitoring transducers. The cycle of interrogation of the monitoring transducers is given a value from a number of discrete values in a series of at least 3. The realization of the claimed method allows one to avoid overflow of data storage module during a slow movement of the pig, as well as an unjustified change of the cycle time of the monitoring transducers at short-term changes of in the pig velocity.

Claims

1. A method for in-tube flaw detection in a pipeline, comprising:

passing inside the pipeline an inspection pig carrying transducers responsive to at least one pipeline diagnostic parameter, the transducers alternately emitting probing pulses and receiving reflected pulses corresponding to the probing pulses, the emitting of probing pulses occurring at a pulse repetition period;

reading data from said transducers, and processing and storing the data measured by said transducers,

determining periodically during the passing a travel speed of the inspection pig with a period of determining the travel speed that is greater than the pulse repetition period; and

varying during the passing the pulse repetition period as a function of the determined value of the pig travel speed and as a function of at least one value of the pig travel speed determined for the passing for a selected preceding lapse of time.

2. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining an average travel speed of the inspection pig for a selected lapse of time in the course of passing the inspection pig, determining the pulse repetition period for the passing as a function of the average travel speed over the selected lapse of time and as a function of at least one average travel speed determined for a selected preceding lapse of time.

3. The method of claim 1, further comprising determining the period of determining the travel speed as a function of the pulse repetition period.

4. The method of claim 3, wherein the period of determining the travel speed is selected to equal N periods of the pulse repetition period, the numerical value of N ranging from 200 to 2000.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulse repetition period is selected from a range of at least three discrete period values, each of the discrete period values corresponds to a first range of inspection pig travel speeds for decreasing the pulse repetition period in the case of an increase in the pig travel speed for a certain lapse of time, and to a second range of the inspection pig travel speeds for increasing the pulse repetition period in the ease of a decrease in the pig travel speed for a certain lapse of time.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulse repetition period is selected from a range of at least three discrete period values,

each of said discrete period values corresponds to a range of inspection pig travel speeds,

under decreasing the inspection pig travel speed for a certain lapse of time within which the speed value goes beyond the limits of a respective speed range, the pulse repetition period of is changed at a time delay of from 10 to 100 s.

7. The method of claim 1, wherein the pulse repetition period is selected from a range of at least three discrete period values,

each of said discrete period values corresponds to a range of inspection pig travel speeds,

for each n-th determination of the pig travel speed, the functional pig speed V_f.s is calculated, using the following recurrence relation V_f.s=K*V_n+V_f.n.−

1(K+1), where V_n being the nth measured pig travel speed, V<sub>f.n−

1</sub> is the functional speed calculated at the preceding (n−

1)th pig speed determination, the quantity K takes on positive value,

having calculated the value of the functional speed V_f.n, one should determine to what speed range relates the speed value found.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the quantity K takes on either of the two values K=0.1 or K=0.5.

9. The method of claim 7, wherein the quantity K takes on either of the two values depending on the sign of the difference Δ

V_n between the nth measured pig speed V_n and the functional pig speed determined at the (n−

1)th determination of the functional speed V<sub>f.n−

1</sub>;

Δ

V_n−

V<sub>f.n−

1</sub>, K=0.1 with Δ

V_n<

0, K=0.5 with Δ

V_n>

0.

10. The method of claim 5, wherein a lower limit of the first speed range exceeds a lower limit of the second speed range, an upper limit of the first speed range exceeds an upper limit of the second speed range, the lower limit of the first speed range is less than the upper limit of the second speed range.

11. The method of claim 10, wherein the difference between the lower limit of the first speed range and the lower limit of the second speed range is less than 0.5 m/s, the difference between the upper limit of the first speed range and the upper limit of the second speed range is less than 0.5 m/s.