Adaptive multi-users interference reduction and cancellation in a CDMA network

• US 6,792,034 B1
• Filed: 10/06/2000
• Issued: 09/14/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 10/06/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories, Inc. (Mitsubishi Electric Corporation)
• Inventors: Horng, Jyhchau, Bao, Jay, Lee, Xiaoyang
• Primary Examiner(s): Tran, Khai
• Assistant Examiner(s): GHULAMALI, QUTBUDDIN
• Application Number:
  US09/684,408
• Time in Patent Office: 1,439 Days
• Field of Search: 375/136, 375/141, 375/144, 375/148, 375/285, 375/346
• US Class Current: 375/148
• CPC Class Codes: H04B 1/7107 Subtractive interference cancellation

Abstract

A method reduces interference adaptively in a CDMA receiver. A baseband signal is demodulated to determine target symbols. The baseband signal is also demodulated to estimate interfering symbols. The interfering symbols are modulated to generate a cancellation signal, and the cancellation signal is subtracted from the base band signal to reduce interference in the target symbols.

Claims

1. A method for reducing interference adaptively in a CDMA receiver, comprising the steps of:

demodulating a baseband signal to determine target symbols, wherein the target symbols are transmitted at a relatively low symbol rate and low signal power;

demodulating the baseband signal to determine interfering symbols, wherein the interfering symbols are transmitted at a relatively high symbol rate and a high signal power;

modulating the interfering symbols to generate a cancellation signal; and

subtracting the cancellation signal from the base band signal to reduce interference in the target symbols.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the receiver is mobile and the demodulating is partial to estimate the interfering symbols.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the receiver is fixed and the demodulating is full to cancel all of the interference in the target symbols.

4. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

measuring a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the target symbols; and

subtracting the cancellation signal when the signal to noise ratio is greater than a predetermined threshold.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the target symbols are modulated with a first Walsh code selected from a set of first Walsh codes and the interfering symbols are modulated with a second Walsh code selected from a set of second Walsh codes, and further comprising:

correlating all members of the second set of Walsh codes; and

selecting a particular second Walsh code with a maximum likelihood correlation to demodulate the baseband signal to estimate the interfering symbols.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein a length of the first Walsh codes is substantially shorter than a length of the second Walsh codes.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

matching a power level of the cancellation signal with a power level of the baseband signal.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

de-spreading the baseband signal; and

delaying the de-spreaded baseband signal before determining the target symbols.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the delay is equal to a length of time required to produce the cancellation signal.

10. An apparatus for reducing interference adaptively in a CDMA receiver, comprising:

a first demodulator to determine target symbols from a baseband signal, wherein the target symbols are transmitted at a relatively low symbol rate and low signal power;

a second demodulating to determine interfering symbols from the baseband signal, wherein the interfering symbols are transmitted at a relatively high symbol rate and a high signal power;

a modulator to generate a cancellation signal from the interfering signal; and

an adder to subtract the cancellation signal from the base band signal to reduce interference in the target symbols.

11. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein demodulation in the second demodulator is partial and the interfering symbols are estimated.

12. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein demodulating in the second demodulator is full to cancel all of the interference in the target symbols.

13. The apparatus of claim 10 further comprising:

means for measuring a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the target symbols, and

wherein the adder subtracts the cancellation signal when the signal to noise ratio is greater than a predetermined threshold.

14. The apparatus of claim 10 wherein the target symbols are modulated with a first Walsh code selected from a set of first Walsh codes and the interfering symbols are modulated with a second Walsh code selected from a set of second Walsh codes, and further comprising:

means for correlating all members of the second set of Walsh codes; and

means for selecting a particular second Walsh code with a maximum likelihood correlation to demodulate the baseband signal to estimate the interfering symbols.

15. The apparatus of claim 10 further comprising:

a gain controller to match a power level of the cancellation signal with a power level of the baseband signal.

16. The apparatus of claim 10 further comprising:

a de-spreader de-spreading the baseband signal;

a delay controller delaying the de-spreaded baseband signal before determining the target symbols.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the delay is equal to a length of time required to produce the cancellation signal.