System and method for active vibration isolation and active vibration cancellation

• US 6,808,051 B2
• Filed: 02/14/2003
• Issued: 10/26/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 09/27/2002
• Status: Expired due to Term

• Current Assignee: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Original Assignee: Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Koninklijke Philips N.V.)
• Inventors: Warmerdam, Thomas P. H.
• Primary Examiner(s): RODRIGUEZ, PAMELA
• Application Number:
  US10/367,511
• Publication Number:
  US 20040060792A1
• Time in Patent Office: 620 Days
• Field of Search: 188/378-380, 188/266.1, 267/136, 267/64.28, 248/550, 248/631, 248/635, 318/568.17, 318/611, 318/632, 318/652, 318/623
• US Class Current: 188/380
• CPC Class Codes: F16F 15/02 Suppression of vibrations of non-rotating, e.g. reciprocating systems; Suppression of vibrations of rotating systems by use of members not moving with the rotating systems F16F15/005 takes precedence ; layered products B32B; suppression of vibration in ships B63; relieving load on bearings, using magnetic means F16C39/06
• CPC Class Codes: F16F 15/03 using magnetic or electromagnetic means F16F9/53, F16F15/005 take precedence
• CPC Class Codes: F16F 2230/08 Sensor arrangement
• CPC Class Codes: F16F 7/1005 characterised by active control of the mass

Abstract

The invention relates to a system and method for vibration isolation and cancellation, especially but not exclusively suited for a damper in wafer-chip production equipment. Active vibration isolation and cancellation technology (or air mount technology) for chip production equipment needs to become more effective with the advancement of the production of chips that require ever-smaller features. Typically, actuators and sensors in an active isolation/cancellation system are frequently used but not optimized in their technology. By integrating the actuators and the sensors together certain performance limitations become negligible and can be discarded. The resulting damper can be of an absolute or of a relative damper type. The performance of a vibration isolation and cancellation system and its limitations can be described using gain and phase relations from the control theory. A damper that uses the proposed system is of a so-called absolute damper type.

Claims

1. A damper system, comprising:

a sensor that can measure a mechanical vibration and is capable of producing an electrical signal caused by the vibration and wherein the sensor is designed to be mounted between a body and a reference mass;

an actuator responsive to the electrical signal thereby producing a force between the body and an external body;

wherein the sensor and the actuator are located substantially close to each other thereby having a substantially small delay;

wherein

the delay substantially consists of the sum of an acoustic signal delay and an electronic signal delay in the actuator and the sensor.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the sensor comprises a Lorenz type coil with magnet pair and the actuator comprises a Lorenz type of coil with magnet pair.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein a line of action of the sensor coincides with a line of action of the actuator.

4. The system of claim 1, further comprising:

an acoustical shielding placed such that acoustical airwaves are substantially attenuated before reaching the reference mass of the sensor.

5. The system of claim 2, wherein the coils are placed such that their induced magnetic fields are substantially perpendicular.

6. The system of claim 2, wherein multiple sensor coils are positioned such that a magnetical field disturbance originating from at least one of the actuator coil and an external source is substantially cancelled by one of subtraction and addition of the sensor signal.

7. The system of claim 2, further comprising:

a magnetical shielding placed such that an EM field induced by the actuator is substantially attenuated.

8. The system of claim 2, further comprising:

a electrical shielding placed such that an EM field induced by the actuator is substantially attenuated.

9. The system of claim 1, wherein the delay is less than about 1 millisecond.

10. The system of claim 1, wherein the delay is less than about 500 microseconds.

11. The system of claim 1, wherein the delay is less than about 50 microseconds.

12. An apparatus, comprising:

an active vibration isolation and cancellation absolute damper mounted between a body to be damped and one of a floor and another body that acts as receiver for the reaction forces, comprising;

a sensor that can measure a mechanical vibration and is capable of producing an electrical signal caused by the vibration and wherein the sensor is designed to be mounted between the apparatus and an external mass; and

an actuator responsive to the electrical signal thereby producing a force between the body and one of the floor and the other body that acts as a receiver for reaction forces;

wherein the sensor and the actuator are located substantially close to each other thereby having a substantially small acoustic delay between the actuator and the sensor;

wherein the delay substantially consists of the sum of an acoustic signal delay and an electronic signal delay in the actuator and the sensor.

13. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the sensor comprises a Lorenz type coil and the actuator comprises a Lorenz type of coil.

14. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein a line of action of the sensor coincides with a line of action of the actuator.

15. The apparatus of claim 12, further comprising:

an acoustical shielding placed such that an acoustical airwave is substantially attenuated before reaching the sensor.

16. The apparatus of claim 13, whereby the coils are placed such that their induced magnetic fields are substantially perpendicular.

17. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising:

a magnetical shielding placed such that an EM field induced by the actuator is substantially attenuated.

18. The apparatus of claim 13, further comprising:

a electrical shielding placed such that an EM field induced by the actuator is substantially attenuated.

19. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the delay is less than about 1 millisecond.

20. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the delay is less than about 500 microseconds.

21. The apparatus of claim 12, wherein the delay is less than about 50 microseconds.

22. A method of actively damping a body from vibration, the method comprising:

measuring a mechanical vibration with a sensor;

producing an electrical signal caused by the vibration and wherein the sensor or is designed to be mounted between the body and a reference mass;

using an actuator for responding to the electrical signal thereby producing a force between the body and an external body; and

using the sensor and the actuator, placed substantially close to each other thereby having a substantially small delay;

wherein the delay substantially consists of the sum of an acoustic signal delay and an electronic signal delay in the actuator and the sensor.

23. The method of claim 22, wherein the delay is less than about 1 millisecond.

24. The method of claim 22, wherein the delay is less than about 500 microseconds.

25. The method of claim 22, wherein the delay is less than about 50 microseconds.

26. The method of claim 22, wherein the sensor comprises a Lorenz type coil with magnet pair and the actuator comprises a Lorenz type of coil with magnet pair.

27. The method of claim 22, wherein a line of action of the sensor coincides with a line of action of the actuator.

28. The method of claim 26, wherein the coils are placed such that their induced magnetic fields are substantially perpendicular.

29. The method of claim 26, wherein multiple sensor coils are positioned such that a magnetical field disturbance originating from at least one of the actuator coil and an external source is substantially cancelled by one of subtraction and addition of the sensor signal.

30. A system for control of a movement of a body relative to a reference, wherein the system comprises:

a sensor for supplying a sensor signal representative of the movement;

an actuator for affecting the movement under control of the sensor signal;

sensor and the actuator are arranged so close to one another that a delay time characterizing the control of the movement is smaller than 1 millisecond and depends substantially only on an acoustic coupling between the sensor and the actuator.

31. The system of claim 30, wherein the delay time is less than 500 microseconds.

32. The system of claim 30, wherein the delay time is less than 50 microseconds.

33. The system of claim 30, for use in a manufacturing of integrated circuitry.

34. The system of claim 30, for damping the movement.

35. The system of claim 30, wherein the sensor comprises a Lorenz type coil with magnet pair and the actuator comprises a Lorenz type of coil with magnet pair.

36. The system of claim 35, wherein the coils are placed such that their induced magnetic fields are substantial perpendicular.

37. The system of claim 35, wherein multiple sensor coils are positioned such that a magnetical field disturbance originating from at least one of the actuator coil and an external source is substantially cancelled by one of subtraction and addition of the sensor signal.

38. The system of claim 30, wherein a line of action of the sensor coincides with a line of action of the actuator.