Method of the identification of weak and/or strong branches of an electric power transmission system

• US 6,832,167 B2
• Filed: 12/23/2002
• Issued: 12/14/2004
• Est. Priority Date: 12/24/2001
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: ABB Power Grids Switzerland AG (Hitachi, Ltd.)
• Original Assignee: ABB Technology AB (ABB Limited)
• Inventors: Sobierajski, Marian, Fulczyk, Marek, Bertsch, Joachim
• Primary Examiner(s): Hoff, Marc S.
• Assistant Examiner(s): SUAREZ, FELIX E
• Application Number:
  US10/325,967
• Publication Number:
  US 20030144802A1
• Time in Patent Office: 722 Days
• Field of Search: 702/57, 702/58, 702/60-62, 702/182, 702/183, 702/185, 702/189, 307/31, 700/292, 703/13, 361/65
• US Class Current: 702/57
• CPC Class Codes: H02J 3/24 Arrangements for preventing or reducing oscillations of power in networks by control effected upon a single generator H02P9/00

Abstract

The subject of the invention is a method of identification of weak and/or strong branches of an electric power transmission system. In the inventive method electrical parameters characterizing the nodes and branches of an electric power transmission system are subjected to computational treatment in order to obtain equations of power flow in all nodes of the system at assumed 100 percent system load value. Then an electric model of a branch is assumed and a curve P-Q is constructed which shows the functional relation between active and reactive load in the system. For the assumed branch model a branch voltage stability coefficient is determined. Then the analysed system is overloaded by increasing the total system load up to 120% base load and the branch voltage stability coefficient is determined again. The numerical values of the appropriately determined coefficients are compared with threshold values considered to be a safe margin for the maintenance of voltage stability for the given branch.

Claims

1. A method for the identification of weak and/or strong branches of an electric power transmission system which employs known analytical methods appropriate to power flow in nodes and branches of the power transmission system and which analyzes functional relations between active and reactive load for this system, wherein the electric parameters characterizing the nodes and branches of the power transmission system are subjected to computational treatment in order to obtain equations of power flow in all nodes of the system at a first load type or base system load, which is used to calculate complex voltage values in those nodes, and a branch voltage stability system coefficient /c_vc/ for an analyzed system branch situated between two receiver nodes, after which the total system load is increased and all operations relating to the determination of the voltage stability coefficient for the analyzed system branch at the predetermined system overload are repeated at a second load type or overload system load, and then the numerical value of one of the branch voltage stability coefficients /c_vc(1)/, /c_vc(2)/ determined for both types of system load is compared with a threshold value considered to be a safe margin for maintaining voltage stability for the analyzed branch, and the value of the difference between the values of the branch voltage stability coefficients determined for both types of system load is checked whether it is more than, equal to or less than zero, and on the basis of those comparisons the analyzed branch is identified as weak or strong.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein for the calculation of the branch voltage stability coefficient /c_vc/ for the analyzed system branch an electrical model of the system branch is assumed and a limiting curve /P-Q/ is constructed, which shows the functional relation between the reactive load /Q/ and the active load /P/ for the assumed electrical model of the branch, and a base load point for that branch is assumed.

3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the analyzed branch is considered weak where the value of the branch voltage stability coefficient /c_vc(1)/ for base system load is less than a threshold value considered to be a safe margin for maintaining voltage stability for the analyzed branch while the difference between the coefficient /c_vc(1)/ determined for the given branch at base system load and the coefficient /c_vc(2)/ determined for the given branch at overload system load is more than zero, or the analyzed branch is considered strong where the value of the branch voltage stability coefficient /c_vc(1)/ for base system load is less than a threshold value considered to be a safe margin for maintaining voltage stability for the analyzed branch while the difference between the coefficient /c_vc(1)/ determined for the given branch at base system load and the coefficient /c_vc(2)/ determined for the given branch at overload system load is less than or equal to zero.

4. A method according to claim 2, wherein the branch voltage stability coefficient /c_vc/ is calculated from this relation:

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the second load type or overload system load is an overload of the system up to 120% base system load.

6. A method according to claim 4, wherein the probability of occurrence of voltage instability p_vc in the analyzed branch is calculated according to this formula:

$p_{\mathrm{vc}}=1-\frac{\begin{array}{c}{\int <br><br>}_{P_{\min }}^{\sqrt{\frac{Q_{\min }}{1-\frac{X_b<br><br>B_b}{2}}\frac{0.25}{{\left(1-\frac{X_b<br><br>B_b}{2}\right)}^2}}}<br><br>(-\left(1-\frac{X_b<br><br>B_b}{2}\right)<br><br>P^2\\ \frac{0.25}{1-\frac{X_b<br><br>B_b}{2}}-Q_{\min })<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>d<br><br>\text{\hspace{1em}<br><br>}<br><br>P\end{array}}{\left(P_{\max }-P_{\min }\right)·<br><br>\left(Q_{\max }-Q_{\min }\right)}$

where;

P_max—

is the maximum value of the coordinates of active load in the branch during critical operating conditions at the voltage stability limit,

P_min—

is the minimum value of the coordinates of active load in the branch,

Q_max—

is the maximum value of the coordinates of reactive load in the branch during critical operating conditions at the voltage stability limit,

X_b—

is the reactance of the analyzed branch, and Bb is its susceptance.

7. A method according to claim 3, wherein the threshold value considered to be a safe margin for maintaining voltage stability for the analyzed branch is equal to 0.125.

8. A method according to claim 2, wherein the analyzed branch is considered weak where the value of the branch voltage stability coefficient /c_vc(1)/ for base system load is less than a threshold value considered to be a safe margin for maintaining voltage stability for the analyzed branch while the difference between the coefficient /c_vc(1)/ determined for the given branch at base system load and the coefficient /c_vc(2)/ determined for the given branch at overload system load is more than zero, or the analyzed branch is considered strong where the value of the branch voltage stability coefficient /c_vc(1)/ for base system load is less than a threshold value considered to be a safe margin for maintaining voltage stability for the analyzed branch while the difference between the coefficient /c_vc(1)/ determined for the given branch at base system load and the coefficient /c_vc(2)/ determined for the given branch at overload system load is less than or equal to zero.