Method and apparatus for use in specifying and insuring service-level quality of service in computer networks

• US 6,871,233 B1
• Filed: 07/05/2000
• Issued: 03/22/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 07/05/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Lucent Technologies, Inc. (Nokia Corporation)
• Original Assignee: Lucent Technologies, Inc. (Nokia Corporation)
• Inventors: van Moorsel, Aad Petrus-Antonius, Bearden, Mark Joseph, Lee, Woei-Jyh, Garg, Sachin
• Primary Examiner(s): Sheikh, Ayaz
• Assistant Examiner(s): LAFORGIA, CHRISTIAN A
• Application Number:
  US09/610,630
• Time in Patent Office: 1,721 Days
• Field of Search: 709/224, 709/226, 709/227, 709/223, 709/225, 709/228, 709/232, 709/233, 709/250
• US Class Current: 709/226
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0893 Assignment of logical groups to network elements
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/0894 Policy-based network configuration management
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/5019 Ensuring fulfilment of SLA
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 41/5032 Generating service level reports
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/00 Arrangements for monitoring or testing data switching networks
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/045 for graphical visualisation of monitoring data
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/08 Monitoring or testing based on specific metrics, e.g. QoS, energy consumption or environmental parameters
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0817 by checking functioning
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0823 Errors, e.g. transmission errors
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 43/0852 Delays
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/10 Flow control; Congestion control
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/20 Traffic policing
• CPC Class Codes: H04L 47/2458 Modification of priorities while in transit

Abstract

The “what” and “how” of policy-based management is integrated in a single framework that enables a system administrator to specify service-level quality of service (QoS) goals for automatic enforcement. Automatic enforcement of the specified “high-level” QoS goals is realized through the execution of “low-level” rule-based or procedural logic, without the client having to specify the low level logic. Specifically, one embodiment of the invention employs a management server including a graphical interface that allows a user, e.g. a system administrator, to easily specify parameters for service-level QoS goals. A QoS goal is defined by the administrator selecting a client, a service and a QoS expression that specifies the desired service-level QoS. The state of the network is monitored and one or more defined QoS goals are selected for evaluation in a continuous process. The QoS delivered for the selected goal is determined and compared to the desired QoS for the selected QoS goal. Then, prescribed actions are taken or not depending whether the delivered QoS is equal to the selected QoS goal. If not, and the delivered QoS exceeds the selected QoS goal, a set of actions is determined and executed to reduce network resources assigned to the client and service of the selected goal. Similarly, if the delivered QoS is worse than the selected QoS goal, a set of actions is determined and executed to increase network resources assigned to the client and service of the selected goal.

Claims

1. A method for use in a policy goal-based management system employing service level goals for a computer network having one or more network resources comprising the steps of:

enabling a system administrator to specify predefined service level goals for said computer network;

specifying a prescribed quality of service goal for a prescribed client and prescribed service;

executing policy goal-logic to automatically enforce said specified quality of service goal, wherein said policy goal-logic is comprised in a general purpose computer program;

monitoring a delivered quality of service for said specified quality of service goal being executed by said policy goal-logic, said monitoring a delivered quality of service including continuously monitoring states of said computer network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service;

determining if said delivered quality of service is different than said specified quality of service goal; and

if so, said policy goal-logic executing prescribed actions regarding network resources assigned to said client for said prescribed service, wherein said actions are intended to adjust said delivered quality of service toward being equal to said specified quality of service goal,

wherein said policy goal-action executes said prescribed actions without the system administrator having to specify said prescribed actions to said policy goal-logic intended to enforce said specified quality of service goal.

2. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes a step of determining if said delivered quality of service exceeds said specified quality of service goal and, if so, said step of executing includes steps of determining and executing a set of actions to reduce said computer network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

3. The method as defined in claim 2 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

4. The method as defined in claim 2 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

5. The method as defined in claim 1 wherein said step of executing policy goal-logic to determine if said delivered quality of service is different includes a step of determining if said delivered quality of service is worse than said specified quality of service goal and, if so, said step of executing prescribed actions includes steps of determining and executing a set of actions to increase network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

6. The method as defined in claim 5 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

7. The method as defined in claim 6 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

8. The method as defined in claim 1 further including the steps of storing said specified quality of service goals and determining whether said stored quality of service goals should be updated.

9. The method as defined in claim 8 further including a step of updating said stored quality of service goals.

10. The method as defined in claim 9 wherein each of said quality of service goals is a service level quality of service goal.

11. The method as defined in claim 10 wherein said step of updating includes steps of adding a service level quality of service goal to said stored quality of service goals, redefining a stored service level quality of service goal or removing a stored service level quality of service goal.

12. The method as defined in claim 1 further including steps of monitoring a state of each network resource in a set of network resources and storing said monitored states.

13. The method as defined in claim 12 further including a step of updating said monitored state of each network resource in said set of said network resources.

14. The method as defined in claim 13 wherein said step of updating includes steps of requesting an update of said state of each network resource in said set of network resources, querying said state of each network resource in said set of network resources and storing said updated state.

15. The method as defined in claim 12 wherein said step of monitoring said state of each network resource further includes steps of receiving a network event notification indicating a change in state of a network resource and storing said indicated change of state of said network resource as an update of the state of said network resource.

16. The method as defined in claim 1 further comprising the steps of:

storing said set of service level quality of service goals;

storing said monitored states of a set of network resources;

wherein said step of specifying a prescribed quality of service goal includes selecting said prescribed defined quality of service goal from said stored service level quality of service goals for a prescribed client and prescribed service; and

wherein said step of monitoring a delivered quality of service includes a step of using said stored monitored states to determine a delivered quality of service for said specified quality of service goal.

17. The method as defined in claim 16 wherein said step of determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes a step of determining if said delivered quality of service exceeds said specified quality of service goal and, if so, said step of executing includes steps of determining and executing a set of actions to reduce network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

18. The method as defined in claim 17 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

19. The method as defined in claim 18 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

20. The method as defined in claim 16 wherein said step of determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes a step of determining if said delivered quality of service is worse than said specified quality of service goal and, if so, said step of executing includes steps of determining and executing a set of actions to increase network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

21. The method as defined in claim 20 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

22. The method as defined in claim 21 further including a step of reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

23. Apparatus for use in a policy goal-based management system including service level goals for a computer network having one or more network resources comprising:

means for enabling a system administrator to specify predefined service level goals for said computer network;

means for specifying a prescribed quality of service goal for a prescribed client and prescribed service;

means for executing policy goal-logic to automatically enforce said specified quality of service goal, wherein said policy goal-logic is comprised in a general purpose computer program;

means for monitoring a delivered quality of service for said specified quality of service goal being executed by said policy goal-logic, including means for continuously monitoring states of said computer network resources assigned to said prescribe client and said prescribed service;

means for determining if said delivered quality of service is different than said specified quality of service goal; and

said means for executing said policy goal-logic, being responsive to said delivered is quality of service being different, to cause said police goal-logic to execute prescribed actions regarding network resources assigned to said client for said prescribed service, wherein said actions are intended to adjust said delivered quality of service toward being equal to said specified quality of service goal,

wherein said police goal-action executes said prescribed actions without the system administrator having to specify said prescribed actions to said goal-logic intended to enforce said specified quality of service goal.

24. The apparatus as defined in claim 23 wherein said means for determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes means for determining if said delivered quality of service exceeds said specified quality of service goal and means for determining and executing a set of actions to reduce said computer network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

25. The apparatus as defined in claim 24 further including means for reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

26. The apparatus as defined in claim 24 further including means for reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

27. The apparatus as defined in claim 23 wherein said means for determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes means for determining if said delivered quality of service is worse than said specified quality of service goal and means for determining and executing a set of actions to increase said computer network resources assigned to said client and said service of said specified quality of service goal.

28. The apparatus as defined in claim 27 further including means for reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

29. The apparatus as defined in claim 27 further including means for reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

30. The apparatus as defined in claim 23 further comprising:

means for storing said set of service level quality of service goals;

means for storing said monitored states of a set of said computer network resources;

wherein said means for specifying a prescribed quality of service goal includes means for specifying said prescribed defined quality of service goal from said stored service level quality of service goals for a prescribed client and prescribed service; and

wherein said means for monitoring a delivered quality of service includes means for using said stored monitored states to determine a delivered quality of service for said specified quality of service goal.

31. The apparatus as defined in claim 30 wherein said means for determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes means for determining if said delivered quality of service exceeds said specified quality of service goal and means for determining and executing a set of actions to reduce network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

32. The apparatus as defined in claim 31 further including a means for reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

33. The apparatus as defined in claim 31 further including means for reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.

34. The apparatus as defined in claim 30 wherein said means for determining if said delivered quality of service is different includes means for determining if said delivered quality of service is worse than said specified quality of service goal and means for determining and executing a set of actions to increase network resources assigned to said prescribed client and said prescribed service of said specified quality of service goal.

35. The apparatus as defined in claim 34 further including means for reporting to said system administrator said set of actions.

36. The apparatus as defined in claim 34 further including means for reporting to said system administrator results of executing said actions.