Single board computer quotation and design system and method

• US 6,898,580 B1
• Filed: 06/07/2000
• Issued: 05/24/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 06/07/2000
• Status: Expired due to Fees

• Current Assignee: Micro Industries Corporation
• Original Assignee: Micro Industries Corporation
• Inventors: Peck, Gary A., Diehl, Russell J., Rahaman, Kevin L., Curran, Michael A.
• Primary Examiner(s): Cosimano, Edward R.
• Application Number:
  US09/589,222
• Time in Patent Office: 1,812 Days
• Field of Search: 700/97, 700/105, 700/106, 700/107, 700/182, 703/1, 705/1, 705/28, 705/29, 705/400, 716/1, 716/8
• US Class Current: 705/400
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 2111/02 CAD in a network environment, e.g. collaborative CAD or distributed simulation
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 30/00 Computer-aided design [CAD]
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 10/087 Inventory or stock management, e.g. order filling, procurement or balancing against orders
• CPC Class Codes: G06Q 30/0283 Price estimation or determination

Abstract

The present invention is a virtual product designer that allows a user to provide specifications for a custom board level product and receive an instantaneous cost quotation and feasibility assessment of the product. The user may connect through the Internet to a virtual product designer to obtain a cost quotation and design feasibility assessment for a specified product. Functional modules that serve as building blocks for a custom design are defined and stored in a library. Attributes and design parameters associated with the functional modules are used to calculate a cost quotation and evaluate design feasibility. As the user changes design requirements while interacting with the virtual product designer, the user is continually updated on the relevant functional, electrical, mechanical and cost parameters.

Claims

1. A system for designing a custom board, comprising:

a plurality of form factors;

a plurality of functional modules;

a cost quotation module for determining a cost quotation for a selected form factor in relation to selected ones of said plurality of functional modules;

a design feasibility module for determining a design feasibility for said selected form factor in relation to selected ones of said plurality of functional modules wherein each selection related to each of said plurality of functional modules is limited according to compatibility with previously selected functional modules determined according to a plurality of functional and physical attributes for each of said plurality of functional modules; and

a computer adapted to display said cost quotation and said design feasibility for said selected form factor in relation to selected ones of said plurality of functional modules as selections related to said form factor or each of said plurality of functional modules are modified by a user.

2. The system of claim 1 wherein said plurality of functional modules is selected from the group consisting of processors, chip sets, memory configurations, graphics controllers, peripheral controllers, and I/O controllers.

3. The system of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of attributes for each of said plurality of functional modules.

4. The system of claim 3 wherein said plurality of attributes comprise cost parameters, a lead time parameter, a minimum buy quantity parameter, power parameters, size parameters, area parameters, placement parameters, mechanical parameters, and electrical parameters.

5. The system of claim 1 wherein said form factor is selected from the group consisting of AT, LPX, ATX, NLX, cPCI, PICMG, and custom SBC.

6. The system of claim 1 further comprising a plurality of attributes for each of said plurality of form factors.

7. The system of claim 6 wherein said plurality of attributes for each of said plurality of form factors comprises size parameters, area parameters, a form factor type parameter, and a maximum number of slots parameter.

8. The system of claim 1 wherein said cost quotation module and said design feasibility module are operational at a web server accessible via the Internet.

9. The system of claim 8 wherein said computer is adapted to connect to said web server via the Internet.

10. The system of claim 1 wherein said computer is adapted to display an inquiry window, a product features window, and a design feasibility window.

11. The system of claim 10 wherein said inquiry window comprises interactive controls for selecting one of said plurality of form factors.

12. The system of claim 10 wherein said products features window displays features for selected ones of said plurality of functional modules.

13. The system of claim 10 wherein said design feasibility window displays a current feasibility analysis for said selected form factor and selected ones of said plurality of functional modules.

14. A computerized method for designing a custom board comprising the steps of:

defining a plurality of form factors;

associating a plurality of functional and physical attributes with said form factors;

defining a plurality of functional modules;

associating a plurality of functional and physical attributes with said functional modules;

prompting a user at a computer to select one of said plurality of form factors;

determining at said computer which of said plurality of functional modules are compatible with said selected form factor according to said functional and physical attributes for said selected form factor and said functional and physical attributes for said plurality of functional modules;

prompting said user at said computer to select at least one of said plurality of functional modules determined to be compatible with said selected form factor;

providing a design feasibility assessment for said selected form factor and said selected functional module, said design feasibility assessment provided by said computer;

providing a cost quotation for said selected form factor and said selected functional module, said cost quotation provided by said computer; and

updating for said user at said computer said design feasibility assessment and said cost quotation as selections for said form factor or functional module are changed by said user.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of said prompting a user to select one of said plurality of form factors comprises the step of prompting said user to select a form factor from the group consisting of AT, LPX, ATX, NLX, cPCI, PICMG, and custom SBC.

16. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of associating a plurality of functional and physical attributes with each of said plurality of form factors comprises the step of associating size parameters, area parameters, a form factor type parameter, and a maximum number of slots parameter with each of said plurality of form factors.

17. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of associating a plurality of functional and physical attributes with each of said plurality of functional modules comprises the step of associating cost parameters, a lead time parameter, a minimum buy quantity parameter, power parameters, size parameters, area parameters, placement parameters, mechanical parameters, and electrical parameters with each of said plurality of functional modules.

18. A computerized method for evaluating custom board designs comprising the steps of:

prompting a computer user to select a plurality of functional modules wherein functional and physical attributes are associated with each of said plurality of functional modules;

prompting said computer user to specify options for said selected functional modules wherein said options for said selected functional modules are limited to options compatible with said user'"'"'s prior selections according to said functional and physical attributes of said functional modules;

displaying for said computer user in a products features window feature information for said selected functional modules and specified options;

displaying for said computer user in a design feasibility window a design feasibility assessment for said selected functional modules and specified options;

determining if said computer user has changed said functional modules and specified options; and

updating said feature information in said products feature window and said design feasibility assessment in said design feasibility window in accordance with changes to said functional modules and specified options.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of displaying a said design feasibility window.

20. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step of associating a plurality of attributes with each of said plurality of functional modules.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein the step of associating a plurality of attributes with each of said plurality of functional modules comprises the step of associating cost parameters, a lead time parameter, a minimum buy quantity parameter, power parameters, size parameters, area parameters, placement parameters, mechanical parameters, and electrical parameters with each of said plurality of functional modules.

22. The method of claim 18 further comprising the step-of prompting said user to select one of a plurality of form factors.

23. The method of claim 22 wherein the step of said prompting a user to select one of a plurality of form factors comprises the step of prompting said user to select a form factor from the group consisting of AT, LPX, ATX, NLX, cPCI, PICMG, and custom SBC.

24. The method of claim 22 further comprising the step of updating said feature information in said products feature window and said design feasibility assessment in said design feasibility window in accordance with said selected form factor.

25. The method of claim 24 wherein the step of displaying in said design feasibility window a cost quotation comprises the steps of:

displaying a material cost for said selected functional modules and specified options;

displaying a labor cost for said selected functional modules and specified options; and

displaying an overhead and profit cost for said selected functional modules and specified options.

26. The method of claim 22 further comprising the step of associating a plurality of functional and physical attributes with each of said plurality of form factors.

27. The method of claim 26 wherein the step of associating a plurality of attributes with each of said plurality of form factors comprises the step of associating size parameters, area parameters, a form factor type parameter, and a maximum number of slots parameter with each of said plurality of form factors.

28. The method of claim 26 further comprising the step of displaying in said design feasibility window a cost quotation for said selected functional modules and specified options.