System and method for grouping diverse operations

• US 6,934,948 B2
• Filed: 01/22/2001
• Issued: 08/23/2005
• Est. Priority Date: 01/22/2001
• Status: Active Grant

• Current Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Original Assignee: International Business Machines Corporation
• Inventors: Tai, Stefan, Rouvellou, Isabelle, Mikalsen, Thomas, Sutton, Stanley
• Primary Examiner(s): Courtenay, III, St. John
• Assistant Examiner(s): NGUYEN, VAN H
• Application Number:
  US09/766,734
• Publication Number:
  US 20020099862A1
• Time in Patent Office: 1,674 Days
• Field of Search: 718/100, 718/101, 718/107, 718/108, 719/313, 719314-316, 719/320, 717/161, 707/10, 709/100, 709/101, 709/201, 709/207, 709/221, 709/314, 709/315, 709/316, 709/320, 345/759
• US Class Current: 718/101
• CPC Class Codes: G06F 9/466 Transaction processing

Abstract

A method is provided for managing a group of two or more operations within a software system. The method includes initiating a group context including a sub-context for each operation in the group context, wherein each operation is supported by one of a transactional resource and a messaging component, performing the operations within the sub-contexts, each operation resulting in an outcome, coupling the outcomes within the group context, determining an overall outcome of the group context, and taking at least one action dependent on the overall outcome. The method further includes the step of terminating the group context upon taking one or more actions.

Claims

1. A computer-implemented method for grouping at least two diverse operations, comprising the steps of:

initiating a context grouping the operations, wherein the group is one of at least two messaging operations, or at least one messaging operation and at least one transactional operation;

performing the operations within the context, each operation resulting in an outcome;

combining the outcomes,

determining an overall outcome based on a combination of the outcomes for each operation;

taking at least one action dependent on the overall outcome; and

terminating the context upon taking the action.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein each operation is supported by an object.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the outcome of each messaging operation is independent of other messaging operation outcomes.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the outcome of a messaging operation is independent of a transactional operation outcome.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein an operation is one of a synchronous invocation on a transactional resource and a conditional asynchronous message between at least two messaging components.

6. The method of claim 1, wherein the synchronous invocation occurs in at least one transaction.

7. The method of claim 5, wherein the asynchronous message results in an outcome, the outcome defined by a condition associated to a corresponding operation.

8. The method of claim 5, further comprising the step of grouping the synchronous invocation in the transaction and the conditional asynchronous message.

9. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of interpreting each outcome as one of a success and a failure.

10. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of interpreting the overall group outcome as one of a success and a failure.

11. The method of claim 10, further comprising the step of evaluating the overall group outcome as a failure if at least one individual operation is interpreted as a failure.

12. The method of claim 1, wherein the action is one of a predefined action, an automatically invoked action, and a performed action.

13. The method of claim 1, wherein the action taken upon determining the overall outcome to be a failure further comprises the step of undoing an operation.

14. The method of claim 1, wherein the action taken upon determining the overall outcome to be a failure further comprises the step of compensating for an operation.